Division of Developmental Immunology, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Centre for Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Povo, Italy.
EMBO Rep. 2018 Mar;19(3). doi: 10.15252/embr.201745440. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Interfering with mitosis for cancer treatment is an old concept that has proven highly successful in the clinics. Microtubule poisons are used to treat patients with different types of blood or solid cancer since more than 20 years, but how these drugs achieve clinical response is still unclear. Arresting cells in mitosis can promote their demise, at least in a petri dish. Yet, at the molecular level, this type of cell death is poorly defined and cancer cells often find ways to escape. The signaling pathways activated can lead to mitotic slippage, cell death, or senescence. Therefore, any attempt to unravel the mechanistic action of microtubule poisons will have to investigate aspects of cell cycle control, cell death initiation in mitosis and after slippage, at single-cell resolution. Here, we discuss possible mechanisms and signaling pathways controlling cell death in mitosis or after escape from mitotic arrest, as well as secondary consequences of mitotic errors, particularly sterile inflammation, and finally address the question how clinical efficacy of anti-mitotic drugs may come about and could be improved.
用有丝分裂干预来治疗癌症是一个由来已久的概念,它在临床上已被证明非常有效。微管毒素已被用于治疗 20 多年来不同类型的血液或实体癌症患者,但这些药物如何实现临床疗效仍不清楚。在有丝分裂中使细胞停滞可以促进其死亡,至少在培养皿中是这样。然而,在分子水平上,这种类型的细胞死亡定义不明确,癌细胞通常会找到逃避的方法。激活的信号通路可导致有丝分裂滑步、细胞死亡或衰老。因此,任何试图阐明微管毒素的作用机制的尝试都必须研究细胞周期控制、有丝分裂中细胞死亡的启动以及滑步后的细胞死亡等方面,以达到单细胞分辨率。在这里,我们讨论了控制有丝分裂中或有丝分裂逃逸后细胞死亡的可能机制和信号通路,以及有丝分裂错误的次要后果,特别是无菌性炎症,最后还探讨了抗有丝分裂药物的临床疗效是如何产生的,以及如何加以改善。