Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, PO Box 29222, Doha, Qatar.
Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3532-3541. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5125-0. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
To determine agreement between modified Peetrons, Chan acute muscle strain injury classification and British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC) and to investigate their associations and ability to predict time to return to sport (RTS).
Male athletes (n=176) with acute hamstring injury and MRI (1.5T) ≤5 days were followed until RTS. MRIs were scored using standardised forms.
For MRI-positive injuries there was moderate agreement in severity grading (κ = 0.50-0.56). Substantial variance in RTS was demonstrated within and between MRI categories. Mean differences showed an overall main effect for severity grading (p < 0.001), but post hoc pairwise comparisons for BAMIC (grade 0a/b vs. 1, p = 0.312; 1 vs 2, p = 0.054; 0a/b vs 2, p < 0.001; 1 vs 3, p < 0.001) and mean differences for anatomical sites (BAMIC a-c, p < 0.001 [a vs b, p = 0.974; a vs c, p = 0.065; b vs c, p = 0.007]; Chan anatomical sites 1-5, p < 0.077; 2A-C, p = 0.373; 2a-e, p = 0.008; combined BAMIC, p < 0.001) varied. For MRI-positive injuries, total explained RTS variance was 7.6-11.9% for severity grading and BAMIC anatomical sites.
There was wide overlap between/variation within the grading/classification categories. Therefore, none of the classification systems could be used to predict RTS in our sample of MRI-positive hamstring injuries.
• Days to RTS varied greatly within the grading and classification categories. • Days to RTS varied greatly between the grading and classification categories. • Using MRI classification systems alone to predict RTS cannot be recommended. • The specific MRI classification used should be reported to avoid miscommunication.
确定改良的 Peetrons、Chan 急性肌肉拉伤分类和英国田径肌肉损伤分类(BAMIC)之间的一致性,并研究它们的相关性和预测重返运动(RTS)的能力。
对 176 名男性运动员进行急性腿筋损伤和 MRI(1.5T)≤5 天的随访,直至 RTS。使用标准化表格对 MRI 进行评分。
对于 MRI 阳性损伤,严重程度分级存在中度一致性(κ=0.50-0.56)。MRI 分类内和分类之间的 RTS 显示出明显的差异。平均差异显示严重程度分级存在整体主要效应(p<0.001),但 BAMIC 的事后两两比较(0a/b 与 1 级,p=0.312;1 级与 2 级,p=0.054;0a/b 与 2 级,p<0.001;1 级与 3 级,p<0.001)和解剖部位的平均差异(BAMIC a-c,p<0.001[a 与 b,p=0.974;a 与 c,p=0.065;b 与 c,p=0.007];Chan 解剖部位 1-5,p<0.077;2A-C,p=0.373;2a-e,p=0.008;综合 BAMIC,p<0.001)存在差异。对于 MRI 阳性损伤,严重程度分级和 BAMIC 解剖部位的总 RTS 解释方差为 7.6-11.9%。
在分级/分类类别之间存在广泛的重叠/变化。因此,在我们的 MRI 阳性腿筋损伤样本中,没有一种分类系统可以用于预测 RTS。
RTS 在分级和分类类别内差异很大。
RTS 在分级和分类类别之间差异很大。
仅使用 MRI 分类系统预测 RTS 不可行。
应报告使用的特定 MRI 分类,以避免沟通失误。