Bone Index Finland Ltd., Kuopio, Finland.
Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Osteoporos Int. 2018 May;29(5):1193-1199. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4408-x. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
We lack effective diagnostics of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. An ultrasound device was used to identify subjects in the osteoporotic range as defined by DXA. A case finding strategy combining ultrasound results with DXA measurements for patients with intermediate ultrasound results is presented.
We lack effective screening and diagnostics of osteoporosis at primary health care. In this study, a pulse-echo ultrasound (US) method is investigated for osteoporosis screening.
A total of 1091 Caucasian women (aged 50-80 years) were recruited for the study and measured with US in the tibia and radius. This method measures cortical thickness and provides an estimate of bone mineral density (BMD) and density index (DI). BMD assessment of the hip was available for 988 women. A total of 888 women had one or more risk factors for osteoporosis (OP ), and 100 women were classified healthy. Previously determined thresholds for the DI were evaluated for assessment of efficacy of the technique to detect hip BMD at osteoporotic range (T-score at or below - 2.5).
In the OP group, the application of thresholds for the DI showed that approximately 32% of the subjects would require an additional DXA measurement. The multi-site ultrasound (US) measurement-based DI showed 93.7% sensitivity and 81.6% specificity, whereas the corresponding values for single-site US measurement-based DI were 84.7 and 82.0%, respectively. The ultrasound measurements showed a high negative predictive value 97.7 to 99.2% in every age decade examined (ages 50-59, 60-69, 70-79 years).
The study data demonstrate that a strategy of combining ultrasound measurement with added DXA measurements in cases with intermediate ultrasound results (about 30%) can be useful for identifying subjects at risk for a low bone mineral density in the osteoporotic range.
我们缺乏初级保健水平骨质疏松症的有效诊断方法。本研究使用超声设备根据 DXA 确定骨质疏松范围的受试者。提出了一种结合超声结果和中间超声结果患者的 DXA 测量的病例发现策略。
我们在初级保健中缺乏有效的筛查和诊断骨质疏松症。在这项研究中,研究了一种脉冲回波超声(US)方法用于骨质疏松症筛查。
共招募了 1091 名高加索女性(年龄 50-80 岁)进行研究,并对其胫骨和桡骨进行 US 测量。该方法测量皮质厚度,并提供骨矿物质密度(BMD)和密度指数(DI)的估计值。988 名女性接受了髋关节 BMD 评估。共有 888 名女性有一个或多个骨质疏松症(OP)风险因素,100 名女性被归类为健康。先前确定的 DI 阈值用于评估该技术检测髋部 BMD 在骨质疏松范围内(T 评分在-2.5 或以下)的功效。
在 OP 组中,应用 DI 阈值表明,大约 32%的受试者需要额外的 DXA 测量。基于多部位超声(US)测量的 DI 显示出 93.7%的敏感性和 81.6%的特异性,而基于单部位 US 测量的 DI 的相应值分别为 84.7%和 82.0%。超声测量在每个年龄十年(50-59、60-69、70-79 岁)均显示出高阴性预测值 97.7%至 99.2%。
研究数据表明,在中间超声结果(约 30%)的情况下,将超声测量与附加 DXA 测量相结合的策略对于识别骨质疏松范围内低骨密度风险的受试者可能是有用的。