• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对青少年被拘留者的改良强化个案研究法:是优化效能还是强调生态效度?

The MRCI with juvenile detainees: optimizing performance or emphasizing ecological validity?

作者信息

Rogers Richard, Sharf Allyson J, Carter Rachel M, Winningham Darby B, Sternad Rose N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #311280, Denton, TX, 76203-5017, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2018 Jan;36(1):1-11. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2328.

DOI:10.1002/bsl.2328
PMID:29460439
Abstract

The Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments (MRCI) are intended to be administered to legally involved youths in a setting free from distractions and stressors with the explicit goal of assessing the examinee's best understanding. However, marked disparities have been observed between juveniles' MRCI performance and their unassisted recall of a representative Miranda warning. We hypothesized that youths' very strong MRCI performance might be partially due to prompts and clarifications used whenever incomplete or ambiguous answers are provided. In this archival study, we systematically re-scored three MRCI instruments from 231 legally involved youths to evaluate their original responses (i.e., non-queried scoring). This approach is viewed as more ecologically valid because actual Miranda warnings are typically provided in a routine manner without assistance following each Miranda component. For the large majority of legally involved juveniles, only small differences were noted between standard and non-queried scoring. However, some dramatic decrements were observed, especially on the Comprehension of Miranda Rights-II (CMR-II). More specifically, 15.7% of CMR-II percentiles dropped precipitously by 60% or more, when using the non-queried scores. The results are discussed within the context of optimized performances versus ecological validity as applied to Miranda evaluations.

摘要

米兰达权利理解工具(MRCI)旨在在没有干扰和压力源的环境中对涉及法律事务的青少年进行测试,其明确目标是评估受测者的最佳理解程度。然而,已观察到青少年在MRCI测试中的表现与其对代表性米兰达警告的无辅助回忆之间存在显著差异。我们推测,青少年在MRCI测试中表现出色,部分原因可能是每当提供不完整或模糊的答案时所使用的提示和澄清。在这项档案研究中,我们对来自231名涉及法律事务的青少年的三份MRCI工具进行了系统的重新评分,以评估他们最初的回答(即未询问式评分)。这种方法被认为在生态上更有效,因为实际的米兰达警告通常是以常规方式提供的,在每个米兰达要素之后没有辅助。对于绝大多数涉及法律事务的青少年来说,标准评分和未询问式评分之间只发现了微小差异。然而,也观察到了一些显著的下降,特别是在米兰达权利理解-II(CMR-II)方面。更具体地说,在使用未询问式评分时,15.7%的CMR-II百分位数急剧下降了60%或更多。本文将在适用于米兰达评估的优化表现与生态有效性的背景下讨论这些结果。

相似文献

1
The MRCI with juvenile detainees: optimizing performance or emphasizing ecological validity?针对青少年被拘留者的改良强化个案研究法:是优化效能还是强调生态效度?
Behav Sci Law. 2018 Jan;36(1):1-11. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2328.
2
Validity and Representative Data of the MRCI With Legally Involved Juveniles.针对涉及法律事务的青少年的MRCI的有效性和代表性数据。
Assessment. 2017 Jul;24(5):591-602. doi: 10.1177/1073191115621792. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
3
An Examination of Juveniles' Miranda Abilities: Investigating Differences in Miranda Recall and Reasoning.青少年米兰达能力考察:探究米兰达记忆与推理的差异
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Jul;34(4):515-38. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2243. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
4
Miranda rights comprehension instruments: a critical review.米兰达权利理解工具:批判性评价。
Assessment. 2013 Oct;20(5):545-54. doi: 10.1177/1073191113481054. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
5
Juveniles' Miranda comprehension: Understanding, appreciation, and totality of circumstances factors.青少年对米兰达规则的理解:理解、认识及整体情况因素
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Jun;39(3):281-93. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000116. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
6
Mired in Miranda misconceptions: a study of legally involved juveniles at different levels of psychosocial maturity.陷入米兰达误解之中:不同心理社会成熟度水平的涉案未成年人研究。
Behav Sci Law. 2014 Jan-Feb;32(1):104-20. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2099. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
7
The Grisso tests for assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda warnings with a forensic sample.格里索测试用于评估法医样本中对米兰达警告的理解和认识。
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):673-92. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2018. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
8
Evaluating juvenile detainees' Miranda misconceptions: The discriminant validity of the Juvenile Miranda Quiz.
Psychol Assess. 2017 May;29(5):556-567. doi: 10.1037/pas0000373. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
9
Juvenile offenders' Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confessions.青少年罪犯对米兰达权利的理解以及自我报告的做出虚假供述的可能性。
Assessment. 2003 Dec;10(4):359-69. doi: 10.1177/1073191103259535.
10
The detrimental impact of alcohol intoxication on facets of Miranda comprehension.酒精中毒对米兰达理解各方面的有害影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;46(4):264-276. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000490.