Forensic and Clinical Psychology Associates, P.A., South Miami, FL, USA.
Assessment. 2013 Oct;20(5):545-54. doi: 10.1177/1073191113481054. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
The Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments (MRCI) constitute a revision of Grisso's Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreciation of Miranda Rights (IAUAMR) original series of tests. We believe that the MRCI represents an improvement in many respects, including (but not limited to) a thorough discussion of admissibility issues in the test manual, simplification of language, the addition of a fifth warning, and updated normative data. We also review some potential challenges associated with the revised MRCI tests. These concerns include inconsistent and confusing terminology in the test manual, potentially nonrepresentative normative data, problematic reliability estimates, issues with scoring criteria for the CMR-II, item and test content representativeness for specific tests, and recommendations on how test effort and malingering should be assessed via the CMR-R-II. We conclude with a series of recommendations for forensic use of the MRCI.
米兰达权利理解工具（MRCI）是对格里索的评估理解和欣赏米兰达权利工具（IAUAMR）原始系列测试的修订版。我们认为，MRCI 在许多方面都有所改进，包括（但不限于）在测试手册中彻底讨论可采性问题、简化语言、增加第五个警告以及更新规范数据。我们还审查了与修订后的 MRCI 测试相关的一些潜在挑战。这些问题包括测试手册中术语不一致且混乱、规范数据可能不具有代表性、可靠性估计存在问题、CMR-II 的评分标准问题、特定测试的项目和测试内容代表性问题，以及关于如何通过 CMR-R-II 评估测试努力和伪装的建议。最后，我们提出了一系列关于法医使用 MRCI 的建议。
