Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;24(3):492-497. doi: 10.3201/eid2403.171499.
Adequacy of the current clinical definition of institutional influenza outbreaks is unclear. We performed a retrospective genome sequencing and epidemiologic analysis of institutional influenza outbreaks that occurred during the 2014-15 influenza season in Toronto, Canada. We sequenced the 2 earliest submitted samples positive for influenza A(H3N2) from each of 38 reported institutional outbreaks in long-term care facilities. Genome sequencing showed most outbreak pairs identified by using the current clinical definition were highly related. Inclusion of surveillance samples demonstrated that outbreak sources were likely introductions from broader circulating lineages. Pairwise distance analysis using majority genome and hemagglutinin-specific genes enabled identification of thresholds for discrimination of within and between outbreak pairs; the area under the curve ranged 0.93-0.95. Routine genome sequencing for defining influenza outbreaks in long-term care facilities is unlikely to add significantly to the current clinical definition. Sequencing may prove most useful for investigating sources of outbreak introductions.
目前对机构性流感暴发的临床定义是否充分尚不清楚。我们对加拿大安大略省多伦多市 2014-15 流感季节发生的机构性流感暴发进行了回顾性基因组测序和流行病学分析。我们对每 38 例长期护理机构报告的暴发中最早提交的 2 份甲型 H3N2 流感阳性样本进行了测序。基因组测序显示,目前临床定义确定的大多数暴发对均高度相关。纳入监测样本表明,暴发源可能是从更广泛的传播谱系中引入的。使用多数基因组和血凝素特异性基因进行的成对距离分析能够确定区分暴发内和暴发间对的阈值;曲线下面积为 0.93-0.95。在长期护理机构中,常规进行基因组测序来定义流感暴发可能不会显著增加目前的临床定义。测序可能最有助于调查暴发引入源。