Rignault D P
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Nov;163(5):465-8.
The recurrence rate after conventional inguinal hernia repair remains a matter of discussion and controversy. Reoperation for a postoperative recurrent hernia, especially when the defect is large, may be difficult if more than one operation has been performed. The idea of interposing a large surface of prosthetic mesh between the peritoneum and the deficient inguinal wall instead of "mending" the defect, represents a radical departure from previous methods of hernia repair. The mesh interposed between the properitoneal space and the musculofascial structures is the only obstacle to peritoneal and visceral protrusion. The mesh must be much larger than the defect, since it is not sutured in place and only intra-abdominal pressure maintains it in place over the hernia defect. This operation constitutes a prosthetic hernioplasty in contrast to the classic reparative herniorrhaphy. It can be carried out through an inguinal, midline or Pfannenstiel incision. During a period of 14 years, 767 patients underwent hernioplasty while 1,382 underwent conventional herniorrhaphy. The number and severity of septic complications was comparable in two groups--2 per cent. The reliability and efficiency of the technique described is demonstrated by the low recurrence rate after reoperation for recurrent hernia: only three (1.2 per cent) recurrences after 239 hernioplasty operations. Of the three techniques for hernioplasty, the "Pfannenstiel" appears to be the easiest, safest and most comfortable for the patient.
传统腹股沟疝修补术后的复发率仍是一个存在争议和讨论的问题。如果已经进行过不止一次手术,那么对术后复发性疝进行再次手术可能会很困难,尤其是当缺损较大时。在腹膜和腹股沟壁缺损处之间置入一大片人工补片,而不是“修补”缺损,这一理念与以往的疝修补方法有根本的不同。置于腹膜外间隙和肌筋膜结构之间的补片是腹膜和内脏突出的唯一阻碍。补片必须比缺损大得多,因为它不是缝合固定在位的,仅靠腹内压将其维持在疝缺损上方的位置。与经典的修复性疝修补术相比,这种手术构成了一种人工疝成形术。它可以通过腹股沟切口、正中切口或Pfannenstiel切口进行。在14年的时间里,767例患者接受了疝成形术,而1382例患者接受了传统疝修补术。两组的感染性并发症数量和严重程度相当——均为2%。复发性疝再次手术后的低复发率证明了所描述技术的可靠性和有效性:239例疝成形术手术后仅有3例(1.2%)复发。在三种疝成形术技术中,“Pfannenstiel”术式对患者来说似乎是最简便、最安全且最舒适的。