• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最佳最差标度法优先考虑有心理健康多重疾病的青年照顾者有意义的结果:一项试点研究。

Best-Worst Scaling to Prioritize Outcomes Meaningful to Caregivers of Youth with Mental Health Multimorbidities: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.

AETNA, Managed Care Pharmacy, Phoenix AZ.

出版信息

J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018 Feb/Mar;39(2):101-108. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000525.

DOI:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000525
PMID:29461997
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Health care decision-making for youth with mental health multimorbidity is guided by outcomes that are considered most meaningful and important. The study objective was to pilot test a best-worst scaling (BWS) instrument designed to assess trade-offs among caregiver-defined, meaningful health care outcomes.

METHODS

A BWS was designed with continuous stakeholder involvement to elicit caregiver-defined outcomes in 4 domains: school, behavioral, social, and independence. Four attributes were identified for each outcome domain, for a total of 16 attributes. Using a balanced incomplete block design, a BWS instrument was developed with 16 choice task questions displaying 6 attributes at a time. A convenience sample was selected from Maryland caregivers of children who were 21 years old or younger and had a developmental delay and a comorbid mental health condition. Participants completed a survey that included demographics and the BWS instrument. Conditional logit was used to estimate utility scores and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each attribute, which were ranked in order of importance. Attribute statements were refined after a respondent debriefing session.

RESULTS

A total of 38 caregivers participated in the pilot study. Child safety to self was the most important outcome (1.01, CI, 0.78-1.24). This was followed by securing support for an Individualized educational plan in school (0.77, CI, 0.54-1.01) and the child being able to stay in school all day (0.53, CI, 0.29-0.77).

CONCLUSION

BWS scenarios that resemble real-life decision-making can be a useful tool to identify preferences for health care outcomes.

摘要

目的

青少年心理健康多病种的医疗决策由被认为最有意义和最重要的结果指导。本研究的目的是对 caregiver 定义的有意义的医疗结果进行权衡的最佳最差分级(BWS)工具进行试点测试。

方法

采用连续利益相关者参与的方式设计了 BWS,以在 4 个领域中获取 caregiver 定义的结果:学校、行为、社会和独立性。为每个结果领域确定了 4 个属性,总共 16 个属性。使用平衡不完全区块设计,开发了一个 BWS 工具,其中包含 16 个选择任务问题,一次显示 6 个属性。从马里兰州的发育迟缓且合并有心理健康状况的 21 岁或以下儿童的 caregiver 中选择了一个方便样本。参与者完成了一份包含人口统计数据和 BWS 工具的调查。条件逻辑回归用于估计每个属性的效用得分和 95%置信区间(CI),并按照重要性进行排名。在受访者的情况汇报会议后,对属性陈述进行了修订。

结果

共有 38 名 caregiver 参加了试点研究。儿童的自我安全是最重要的结果(1.01,CI,0.78-1.24)。其次是确保孩子在学校获得个人教育计划的支持(0.77,CI,0.54-1.01)和孩子能够全天留在学校(0.53,CI,0.29-0.77)。

结论

类似于实际决策的 BWS 情景可以成为识别医疗结果偏好的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Best-Worst Scaling to Prioritize Outcomes Meaningful to Caregivers of Youth with Mental Health Multimorbidities: A Pilot Study.最佳最差标度法优先考虑有心理健康多重疾病的青年照顾者有意义的结果:一项试点研究。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018 Feb/Mar;39(2):101-108. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000525.
2
Care Management for Youth With Comorbid Developmental and Mental Health Conditions: A Discrete Choice Experiment Pilot Study.共病发育和心理健康状况的青年照护管理:离散选择实验初步研究。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Mar;20(2):241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.05.127. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
Caregiver Treatment Preferences for Children with a New Versus Existing Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnosis.新诊断与已诊断注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的照料者治疗偏好
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017 Apr;27(3):234-242. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0157. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
4
Using Best-Worst Scaling to Measure Caregiver Preferences for Managing their Child's ADHD: A Pilot Study.使用最佳-最差标度法测量照顾者对管理其子女注意力缺陷多动障碍的偏好:一项试点研究。
Patient. 2015 Oct;8(5):423-31. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0098-4.
5
Eliciting patient preferences, priorities and trade-offs for outcomes following kidney transplantation: a pilot best-worst scaling survey.肾移植术后结果的患者偏好、优先事项及权衡因素:一项最佳-最差比例标度法试点调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 25;6(1):e008163. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008163.
6
7
Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.纳入最佳最差标度调查的离散选择实验的属性选择。
Value Health. 2021 Apr;24(4):575-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.025. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
8
Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.成人社会关怀结局:偏好加权测量的发展。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(16):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta16160.
9
A best-worst scaling experiment to identify patient-centered claims-based outcomes for evaluation of pediatric antipsychotic monitoring programs.一种用于识别以患者为中心的基于临床报告结局的最佳最差标度实验,用于评估儿科抗精神病药物监测项目。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):418-431. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13610. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
A best-worst scaling experiment to prioritize caregiver concerns about ADHD medication for children.一项最佳-最差比例缩放实验,用于确定照顾者对儿童多动症药物治疗的关注重点。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Feb 1;66(2):208-11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300525. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of Testing Client Preferences for Accessing Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment (iOAT): A Pilot Study.测试客户对接受注射用阿片类激动剂治疗(iOAT)偏好的可行性:一项试点研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Dec 23;16:3405-3413. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S391532. eCollection 2022.
2
Feasibility of a best-worst scaling exercise to set priorities for autism research.采用最佳最差标度法对自闭症研究优先级进行设定的可行性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1643-1651. doi: 10.1111/hex.13508. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
3
Diagnostic and Medication Treatment Disparities in African American Children with ADHD: a Literature Review.
非裔美国儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的诊断和药物治疗差异:文献综述。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Oct;9(5):2027-2048. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01142-0. Epub 2021 Sep 14.