Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Departments of Gastroenterology & Clinical Pharmacology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Feb 15;24(3):539-545. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izx065.
Whether to use biologic treatment for inflammatory bowel disease as monotherapy or in combination with immunosuppressives has been a matter of debate in the last 2 decades. Combination therapy was not superior in any of the registration trials for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis for TNF antagonists, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab. It needs to be mentioned, though, that none of these trials were powered to detect such differences, and that many patients entered the trial after having failed conventional immunosuppressives.Postmarketing studies revealed that patients on background immunosuppression have a lower risk of immunogenicity (often resulting in infusion/injection reactions) than patients on monotherapy. In the SONIC and UC-SUCCESS trials, superiority of the combination azathioprine-infliximab was demonstrated in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, respectively. This trial design has not been used with any other biologic for IBD, so far. Meanwhile, it has also become clear that combination treatment with TNF antagonists is associated with increased toxicity, mainly infections, but also malignancy such as lymphoproliferative disease. This toxicity could perhaps be reduced by using lower doses of immunosuppressives, a strategy that has been shown to be equally potent in reducing immunogenicity. Additionally, combination treatment could be used for a limited period of time (12 months or even shorter) since most immunogenicity develops in the beginning of the biologic treatment. Patients who develop anti-drug-antibodies later on can often be rescued by reintroduction of thiopurines or methotrexate.In summary, combination treatment is certainly beneficial with infliximab, at least in the first 12 months of treatment. With other TNF antagonists, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab, the available data do not offer clear guidance. In patients without increased risk of toxicity, and certainly in those with limited treatment options, it may be wise to offer combination treatment with all biologics for the time being and at least during the initiation phase.
在过去的 20 年里,对于炎症性肠病(IBD),是否使用生物制剂作为单一疗法或联合免疫抑制剂进行治疗一直存在争议。在克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎的 TNF 拮抗剂、vedolizumab 和 ustekinumab 的注册试验中,联合治疗在任何方面均不占优势。不过,需要指出的是,这些试验都没有足够的效力来发现这种差异,而且许多患者在接受试验治疗之前已经使用了传统免疫抑制剂治疗失败。上市后研究表明,接受背景免疫抑制治疗的患者发生免疫原性(常导致输注/注射反应)的风险低于接受单一疗法的患者。在 SONIC 和 UC-SUCCESS 试验中,分别在克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎中证实了联合治疗(azathioprine-infliximab)的优越性。到目前为止,这种试验设计尚未用于任何其他 IBD 的生物制剂。同时,也已经清楚地表明,TNF 拮抗剂的联合治疗与毒性增加有关,主要是感染,还有恶性肿瘤如淋巴增生性疾病。通过使用较低剂量的免疫抑制剂,这种毒性或许可以降低,这种策略已被证明在降低免疫原性方面同样有效。此外,联合治疗可以在有限的时间内使用(12 个月甚至更短),因为大多数免疫原性发生在生物治疗的开始阶段。以后产生抗药物抗体的患者通常可以通过重新引入硫嘌呤或甲氨蝶呤来挽救。总之,联合治疗对于 infliximab 肯定是有益的,至少在治疗的前 12 个月是这样。对于其他 TNF 拮抗剂、vedolizumab 和 ustekinumab,现有的数据并没有提供明确的指导。对于没有增加毒性风险的患者,当然对于那些治疗选择有限的患者,目前暂时使用所有生物制剂进行联合治疗,至少在起始阶段是明智的。