LeCompte Michael C, McTyre Emory, Henson Adrianna, Farris Michael, Okoukoni Catherine, Cramer Christina K, Triozzi Pierre, Ruiz Jimmy, Watabe Kounosuke, Lo Hui-Wen, Munley Michael T, Laxton Adrian W, Tatter Stephen B, Zhou Xiaobo, Chan Michael
Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine.
Department of Medicine (hematology & Oncology), Wake Forest School of Medicine.
Cureus. 2017 Dec 11;9(12):e1934. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1934.
Introduction The roles of early whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone in the treatment of melanoma patients with brain metastasis remain uncertain. We investigated the volumetric kinetics of brain metastasis development and associations with clinical outcomes for melanoma patients who received upfront SRS alone. Methods Volumetric brain metastasis velocity (vBMV) was defined as the volume of new intracranial disease at the time of distant brain failure (DBF) for the first DBF (DBF1) and second DBF (DBF2) averaged over the time since initial or most recent SRS. Non-volumetric brain metastasis velocity (BMV) was calculated for comparison. Results Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 7.7 months. Increasing vBMV was associated with worsened OS (hazard ratio (HR): 1.10, confidence interval (CI): 1.02 - 1.18, p = .01). Non-volumetric BMV was not predictive of OS after DBF1 (HR: 1.00, CI: 0.97 - 1.02, p = .77). Cumulative incidence of DBF2 at three months after DBF1 was 50.0% for vBMV > 4 cc/yr versus (vs) 15.1% for vBMV ≤ 4 cc/yr, (Gray's p-value = .02). Cumulative incidence of salvage WBRT at three months after DBF1 was 50.0% for vBMV > 4 cc/yr vs 2.3% for vBMV ≤ 4 cc/yr (Gray's p-value < .001). Conclusion In melanoma patients with brain metastasis, volumetric BMV was predictive of survival, shorter time to second DBF, and the need for salvage WBRT. Non-volumetric BMV, however, did not predict for these outcomes, suggesting that vBMV is a stronger predictor in melanoma.
引言 早期全脑放疗(WBRT)和单纯 upfront 立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)在黑色素瘤脑转移患者治疗中的作用仍不明确。我们研究了接受单纯 upfront SRS 的黑色素瘤患者脑转移瘤发展的体积动力学及其与临床结局的相关性。方法 脑转移瘤体积速度(vBMV)定义为首次远处脑衰竭(DBF)(DBF1)和第二次 DBF(DBF2)时新出现的颅内病灶体积,取自初始或最近一次 SRS 后的平均时间。计算非体积脑转移瘤速度(BMV)用于比较。结果 所有患者的中位总生存期(OS)为 7.7 个月。vBMV 增加与 OS 恶化相关(风险比(HR):1.10,置信区间(CI):1.02 - 1.18,p = 0.01)。DBF1 后非体积 BMV 不能预测 OS(HR:1.00,CI:0.97 - 1.02,p = 0.77)。DBF1 后三个月,vBMV > 4 cc/年时 DBF2 的累积发生率为 50.0%,而 vBMV ≤ 4 cc/年时为 15.1%,(Gray 检验 p 值 = 0.02)。DBF1 后三个月,vBMV > 4 cc/年时挽救性 WBRT 的累积发生率为 50.0%,而 vBMV ≤ 4 cc/年时为 2.3%(Gray 检验 p 值 < 0.001)。结论 在黑色素瘤脑转移患者中,体积 BMV 可预测生存期、至第二次 DBF 的时间缩短以及挽救性 WBRT 的需求。然而,非体积 BMV 不能预测这些结局,提示 vBMV 在黑色素瘤中是更强的预测指标。