• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮微波消融治疗转移性肾细胞癌的局部控制。

Percutaneous microwave ablation for local control of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.

Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, E3/376 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Sep;43(9):2446-2454. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1498-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-018-1498-z
PMID:29464274
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the article is to evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of microwave ablation for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2011 to December 2016, 33 mRCC were ablated in 18 patients using percutaneous microwave ablation. Sites of mRCC include retroperitoneum (n = 12), contralateral kidney (n = 6), liver (n = 6), lung (n = 5), adrenal gland (n = 5). Technical success, local, and distant tumor progression, and complications were assessed at immediate and follow-up imaging. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved for 33/33 (100%) mRCC tumors. Ablation provided durable local control for 28/30 (93%) mRCC tumors in 17 patients at a median duration of clinical and imaging follow-up of 1.6 years (IQR 0.7-3.6) and 0.8 years (IQR 0.5-2.7), respectively. In-hospital and perioperative mortality was 0%. There were 5 (15%) procedure-related complications including one high-grade event (Clavien-Dindo III). Four patients have died from mRCC at a median of 1.3 years (range 0.7-5.1) following ablation. Estimated OS (95% CI number still at risk) at 1, 2, and 5 years were 86% (53-96%, 11), 75% (39-92%, 8), and 75% (39-92%, 3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Microwave ablation of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma is safe and provides durable local control in appropriately selected patients.

摘要

目的

本文旨在评估微波消融治疗转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的安全性和肿瘤学疗效。

材料与方法

2011 年 9 月至 2016 年 12 月,18 例患者共 33 个 mRCC 病灶接受经皮微波消融治疗。mRCC 病灶部位包括腹膜后(n=12)、对侧肾脏(n=6)、肝脏(n=6)、肺(n=5)、肾上腺(n=5)。在即刻和随访影像学检查中评估技术成功率、局部和远处肿瘤进展以及并发症。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法进行生存分析。

结果

33/33(100%)mRCC 肿瘤均达到技术成功。17 例患者中,28/30(93%)mRCC 肿瘤在中位 1.6 年(IQR 0.7-3.6)和 0.8 年(IQR 0.5-2.7)的临床和影像学随访中获得持久的局部控制。住院期间和围手术期死亡率为 0%。有 5 例(15%)发生与手术相关的并发症,包括 1 例 3 级事件(Clavien-Dindo III 级)。4 例患者在消融后中位 1.3 年(范围 0.7-5.1 年)死于 mRCC。1、2 和 5 年的估计 OS(95%CI 尚存风险人数)分别为 86%(53-96%,11 例)、75%(39-92%,8 例)和 75%(39-92%,3 例)。

结论

微波消融治疗寡转移肾细胞癌是安全的,可在适当选择的患者中提供持久的局部控制。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous microwave ablation for local control of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.经皮微波消融治疗转移性肾细胞癌的局部控制。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Sep;43(9):2446-2454. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1498-z.
2
Percutaneous microwave ablation of T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma: short-term efficacy and complications with emphasis on tumor complexity and single session treatment.经皮微波消融治疗 T1a 和 T1b 期肾癌:短期疗效和并发症,重点关注肿瘤复杂性和单次治疗。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Jun;41(6):1203-11. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0776-x.
3
Tumor location does not impact oncologic outcomes for percutaneous microwave ablation of clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma.肿瘤位置并不影响经皮微波消融治疗临床 T1a 期肾癌的肿瘤学结果。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):6319-6329. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06121-y. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Effect of Tumor Complexity and Technique on Efficacy and Complications after Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Stage T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.肿瘤复杂性和技术对T1a期肾细胞癌经皮微波消融术后疗效及并发症的影响:一项单中心回顾性研究
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):272-280. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160592. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
5
Percutaneous microwave ablation of renal cancers under CT guidance: safety and efficacy with a 2-year follow-up.CT引导下经皮微波消融治疗肾癌:2年随访的安全性和疗效
Clin Radiol. 2017 Sep;72(9):786-792. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
Microwave treatment of renal cell carcinoma adjacent to renal sinus.肾窦旁肾细胞癌的微波治疗
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Nov;85(11):2083-2089. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
7
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Category T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Intermediate Results on Safety, Technical Feasibility, and Clinical Outcomes of 119 Tumors.经皮微波消融治疗 T1a 期肾癌:119 个肿瘤的安全性、技术可行性和临床结果的中期结果。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jan;216(1):117-124. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22818. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Percutaneous microwave ablation therapy of renal cancer local relapse after radical nephrectomy: a feasibility and efficacy study.经皮微波消融治疗根治性肾切除术后肾癌局部复发:一项可行性和疗效研究。
Med Oncol. 2020 Mar 13;37(4):27. doi: 10.1007/s12032-020-01354-0.
9
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Histologically Proven T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma.经组织学证实的 T1 期肾细胞癌的经皮微波消融。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):1025-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02423-7. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
10
Percutaneous Image-Guided Thermal Ablation for Multifocal Renal Cell Carcinoma: 10-Year Experience at a Single Center.经皮影像引导热消融治疗多灶性肾细胞癌:单中心 10 年经验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct;209(4):733-739. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18290. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Treatment of Retroperitoneal Tumors.经皮微波消融治疗腹膜后肿瘤
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230080. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230080.
2
Beyond the Knife in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review-To Ablate or Not to Ablate?肾癌治疗中除手术外的方法:一项关于是否进行消融治疗的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;15(13):3455. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133455.
3
Approaches to Oligometastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.寡转移性肾细胞癌的治疗方法。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Apr;25(4):251-256. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01379-4. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
4
Current Options for Second-Line Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌二线全身治疗的当前选择
J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2022 Sep 29;9(3):29-40. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v9i3.243. eCollection 2022.