• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Viability of single balloon enteroscopy performed under endoscopist-directed sedation.

作者信息

López Rosés Leopoldo, Álvarez Beatriz, González Ramírez Abel, López Baz Alina, Fernández López Alexia, Alonso Sara, Dacal Andrés, Martí Eva, Albines Gino, Fernández Molina Julieta, Lancho Ángel

机构信息

Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, España.

Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti.

出版信息

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Apr;110(4):240-245. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5245/2017.

DOI:10.17235/reed.2018.5245/2017
PMID:29465247
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

there is a lot of controversy with regard to who should be responsible for sedation during digestive endoscopy, particularly in advanced procedures that require deep sedation such as enteroscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the endoscopist-directed sedation viability during single balloon enteroscopy.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

this was a prospective, observational study of a series of consecutive enteroscopies. The clinical staff included an endoscopist, scrub nurse and a nurse in charge of monitoring and sedative administration. The following parameters were monitored: pulse oximetry, blood pressure (every five minutes), electrocardiogram and respiratory rate. There was continuous supplemental oxygen and CO2 insufflation. The patient was in the left lateral decubitus position and a fluoroscopic control was used.

RESULTS

forty-four explorations were performed in 39 patients, 24 were male and 15 female. The median age was 74 (18-89) and the ASA score was I in 12 cases, II in 23 cases and III in nine cases. Comorbidities were present in 68% of cases. The drugs used included propofol in 23 cases, propofol and midazolam in ten cases, propofol/midazolam/fentanyl in two cases, propofol and fentanyl in two cases, and midazolam/fentanyl in seven cases. All procedures were complete. The length of the procedure was 52 minutes (20-120). There were diagnostic findings in 65.9% of cases and therapeutic measures in 47.7%. There were no severe complications and the rate of complications derived from sedation was 22.7%.

CONCLUSION

endoscopist-directed sedation is effective and safe for single balloon enteroscopy. Multi-center and wider studies are needed in order to better assess the efficacy, safety and efficiency of sedation controlled by a non-anesthetist during advanced endoscopy in this field.

摘要

相似文献

1
Viability of single balloon enteroscopy performed under endoscopist-directed sedation.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Apr;110(4):240-245. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5245/2017.
2
Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation for colonoscopy is safe and effective: a prospective Spanish study over 1000 consecutive exams.非麻醉医师管理的丙泊酚镇静用于结肠镜检查是安全有效的:一项超过 1000 例连续检查的前瞻性西班牙研究。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jul;24(7):787-92. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328353fcbc.
3
Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.咪达唑仑与哌替啶对比丙泊酚与芬太尼用于上消化道超声内镜检查的患者自控镇静/镇痛:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Dig Liver Dis. 2007 Nov;39(11):1024-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
4
Sedation during upper GI endoscopy in cirrhotic outpatients: a randomized, controlled trial comparing propofol and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl.肝硬化门诊患者上消化道内镜检查时的镇静:一项比较丙泊酚和芬太尼与咪达唑仑和芬太尼的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):45-51, 51.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.025.
5
The First US Clinical Experience With Computer-Assisted Propofol Sedation: A Retrospective Observational Comparative Study on Efficacy, Safety, Efficiency, and Endoscopist and Patient Satisfaction.美国首例计算机辅助丙泊酚镇静临床经验:一项关于疗效、安全性、效率以及内镜医师和患者满意度的回顾性观察比较研究
Anesth Analg. 2017 Sep;125(3):804-811. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001898.
6
Propofol sedation with fentanyl or midazolam during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in children.儿童食管胃十二指肠镜检查期间使用丙泊酚联合芬太尼或咪达唑仑进行镇静。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Nov;22(11):848-52. doi: 10.1017/S0265021505001432.
7
Sedation with propofol in digestive endoscopy administered by gastroenterologists. Experience in a Venezuelan hospital.委内瑞拉一家医院的经验:胃肠病学家在消化内镜检查中使用丙泊酚进行镇静。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Apr;110(4):246-249. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5185/2017.
8
Prospective audit of the safety of endoscopist-directed nurse-administered propofol sedation in an Australian referral hospital.澳大利亚转诊医院内镜医师指导下护士管理的异丙酚镇静安全性的前瞻性审核。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;36(2):490-497. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15204. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
9
Quality of sedation with propofol administered by non-anesthetists in a digestive endoscopy unit: the results of a one year experience.非麻醉医生在消化内镜室使用丙泊酚进行镇静的质量:一年经验的结果。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Apr;110(4):231-236. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5283/2017.
10
Severe cardiorespiratory complications derived from propofol sedation monitored by an endoscopist.由内镜医师监测的丙泊酚镇静引发的严重心肺并发症。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Apr;110(4):237-239. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5282/2017.

引用本文的文献

1
The Incidence of Adverse Events in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation with Propofol Administered by Non-Anesthetists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非麻醉医师使用丙泊酚进行程序性镇静的成年患者不良事件的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 14;15(10):1234. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101234.