Disma N, Astuto M, Rizzo G, Rosano G, Naso P, Aprile G, Bonanno G, Russo A
University of Catania, Policlinic, Anesthesiology Unit, Catania, Italy.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Nov;22(11):848-52. doi: 10.1017/S0265021505001432.
Sedation is commonly used to facilitate diagnostic procedures in children. The aim of our study was to investigate sedation in children using propofol alone or combined with fentanyl or midazolam with regard to efficacy, adverse reactions or side-effects related to the drugs, ease of operation for the endoscopist, and time to discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit.
We prospectively studied 240 children, aged 1-12 yr of age, undergoing endoscopic procedures of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The patients were given an oral premedication with midazolam (0.5 mg kg(-1)) and were then randomly allocated to one of the three study groups: propofol alone (Group P), propofol with fentanyl 1 mug kg-1 (Group PF) or propofol with midazolam 0.1 mg kg(-1) (Group PM). Additional doses of propofol given during the procedure were recorded. Adequacy of sedation and ease of procedure (easy, adequate, impossible) were evaluated by the endoscopist, who was blinded as to the drugs used.
The duration of the procedure and the recovery period were similar in the three groups. The number of patients requiring supplemental doses of propofol to permit safe completion of gastroscopy was 31 in Group P (=39%; eight of these required two additional doses), 14 in Group PM (=18%), and 11 in Group PF (=13%) (P < 0.05). There was a lower incidence of adverse events in Group PM and in Group PF than in Group P (P < 0.05).
Propofol in combination with fentanyl or midazolam gives better sedation and ease of endoscopy than propofol alone.
镇静常用于辅助儿童的诊断性操作。本研究旨在探讨单独使用丙泊酚或联合芬太尼或咪达唑仑对儿童进行镇静时,在疗效、与药物相关的不良反应或副作用、内镜医师操作的便捷性以及从麻醉后护理单元出院时间方面的情况。
我们前瞻性地研究了240名年龄在1至12岁接受上消化道内镜检查的儿童。患者术前口服咪达唑仑(0.5mg/kg),然后随机分为三个研究组之一:单独使用丙泊酚组(P组)、丙泊酚联合1μg/kg芬太尼组(PF组)或丙泊酚联合0.1mg/kg咪达唑仑组(PM组)。记录操作过程中给予的额外丙泊酚剂量。内镜医师在不知道所用药物的情况下评估镇静的充分性和操作的便捷性(容易、充分、不可能)。
三组的操作持续时间和恢复期相似。P组中需要补充丙泊酚剂量以安全完成胃镜检查的患者有31例(占39%;其中8例需要额外补充两剂),PM组有14例(占18%),PF组有11例(占13%)(P<0.05)。PM组和PF组的不良事件发生率低于P组(P<0.05)。
丙泊酚联合芬太尼或咪达唑仑比单独使用丙泊酚能提供更好的镇静效果和更便捷的内镜检查。