• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管气体灌注测压的标准值。

Standard values for gas-perfusion manometry of the esophagus.

作者信息

Höhne Sven, Hesse Viola

机构信息

Department of Operative and Conservative Medicine in Children and Adolescents, Martin-Luther University, Germany.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(8):e9910. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009910.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000009910
PMID:29465580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5841971/
Abstract

The manometry with water-perfused or solid-state catheters is the predominant diagnostic procedure to detect motility disorders of the esophagus. Another method is the manometry using gas-perfused catheters. Although the high-resolution manometry is the method of first choice, the conventional manometry with helium has some advantages: the simple and hygienically unproblematic use and the absence of any artefacts by the perfusion medium compared with water-perfusion, and the considerably lower costs compared with the solid-state catheters. Every method has own normal values because of the specific pressure transmission and the design of the catheter probes. To our knowledge, normal values for gas-perfusion manometry of the esophagus have not yet been published.The esophageal manometry with helium-perfused catheters was performed in 30 healthy volunteers. The main parameters of the esophageal motility and the lower esophageal sphincter were analyzed by liquid and bolus-like swallows and compared with the previous published values in other manometric procedures.The values of the motility in the distal esophagus are consistent; the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter is generally lower than with other methods. The distal wave amplitude and the propagation velocity are significant higher in the distal esophagus than in the middle. The perfusion medium is well tolerated by the investigated volunteers.

摘要

使用水灌注导管或固态导管进行测压是检测食管动力障碍的主要诊断方法。另一种方法是使用气体灌注导管进行测压。尽管高分辨率测压是首选方法,但传统的氦气测压有一些优点:使用简单且卫生方面没有问题,与水灌注相比,灌注介质不会产生任何伪像,并且与固态导管相比成本要低得多。由于特定的压力传导和导管探头的设计,每种方法都有自己的正常值。据我们所知,食管气体灌注测压的正常值尚未公布。对30名健康志愿者进行了氦气灌注导管食管测压。通过液体和团块样吞咽分析食管动力和食管下括约肌的主要参数,并与之前其他测压方法中公布的值进行比较。食管远端的动力值是一致的;食管下括约肌的压力通常低于其他方法。食管远端的波幅和传播速度明显高于中部。所研究的志愿者对灌注介质耐受性良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d25/5841971/7618835fe860/medi-97-e9910-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d25/5841971/2e309e2359b3/medi-97-e9910-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d25/5841971/9fdcb97f2409/medi-97-e9910-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d25/5841971/3b08b1d6d01c/medi-97-e9910-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d25/5841971/7618835fe860/medi-97-e9910-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d25/5841971/2e309e2359b3/medi-97-e9910-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d25/5841971/9fdcb97f2409/medi-97-e9910-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d25/5841971/3b08b1d6d01c/medi-97-e9910-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d25/5841971/7618835fe860/medi-97-e9910-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Standard values for gas-perfusion manometry of the esophagus.食管气体灌注测压的标准值。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(8):e9910. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009910.
2
Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid-state high-resolution manometry.导管直径对通过固态高分辨率测压法研究食管动力的影响。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(7):661-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12029. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
3
Normal values for water-perfused esophageal high-resolution manometry.水灌注食管高分辨率测压的正常值
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015 Jun;107(6):354-8.
4
An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.对有和没有食管动力异常的个体的食管远端阻抗进行分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;42(7):776-81. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31806daf77.
5
Significant pressure differences between solid-state and water-perfused systems in lower esophageal sphincter measurement.在下食管括约肌测量中,固态系统与水灌注系统之间存在显著的压力差异。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3565-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4109-x. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
6
The Esophageal Manometry with Gas-perfused Catheters.气体灌注导管食管测压法
Open Med (Wars). 2018 Jun 14;13:232-236. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0036. eCollection 2018.
7
ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY.通过高分辨率测压法评估男性和女性的食管动力
Arq Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr-Jun;54(2):145-147. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.201700000-10. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
The motility of esophageal sphincters during liquid and solid bolus swallows: a multicenter normative value study of high-resolution manometry in China.液体和固体食团吞咽过程中食管括约肌的运动功能:中国高分辨率测压的多中心正常值研究
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Jan;29(1). doi: 10.1111/nmo.12914. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
9
The influence of physical strain on esophageal motility in healthy volunteers studied with gas-perfusion manometry.通过气体灌注测压法研究体力负荷对健康志愿者食管动力的影响。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Aug;27(8):1082-8. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12587. Epub 2015 May 24.
10
Normal values for esophageal high-resolution manometry.食管高分辨率测压的正常值。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Sep;25(9):762-e579. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12167. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing.食管动力障碍的诊断:食管压力地形图与传统线性描记法对比
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;110(7):967-77; quiz 978. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.159. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
2
The influence of physical strain on esophageal motility in healthy volunteers studied with gas-perfusion manometry.通过气体灌注测压法研究体力负荷对健康志愿者食管动力的影响。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Aug;27(8):1082-8. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12587. Epub 2015 May 24.
3
Significant pressure differences between solid-state and water-perfused systems in lower esophageal sphincter measurement.
在下食管括约肌测量中,固态系统与水灌注系统之间存在显著的压力差异。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3565-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4109-x. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
4
Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill-Unisensor high-resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions.仰卧位和坐位时,Sandhill-Unisensor高分辨率测压组件所获数据的正常食管压力地形图指标。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):285-92. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12501. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
5
The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.《芝加哥食管动力障碍分类,第3.0版》
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
6
[Function of oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with cystic fibrosis].[囊性纤维化患者食管功能及胃食管反流情况]
Z Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;52(4):343-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350445. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
7
Systematic analysis of esophageal pressure topography in high-resolution manometry of 68 normal volunteers.68名正常志愿者高分辨率测压中食管压力地形图的系统分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(7):651-60. doi: 10.1111/dote.12027. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
8
Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.芝加哥食管动力障碍分类标准在高分辨率食管测压中的定义。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Mar;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x.
9
Normal values for manometry performed with swallows of viscous test material.使用粘性测试材料吞咽进行测压的正常数值。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(2):155-60. doi: 10.1080/00365520701679603.
10
Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities.食管动力异常的分类。
Gut. 2001 Jul;49(1):145-51. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.1.145.