Suppr超能文献

《芝加哥食管动力障碍分类,第3.0版》

The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

作者信息

Kahrilas P J, Bredenoord A J, Fox M, Gyawali C P, Roman S, Smout A J P M, Pandolfino J E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders, utilizing an algorithmic scheme to analyze clinical high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies, has gained acceptance worldwide.

METHODS

This 2014 update, CC v3.0, developed by the International HRM Working Group, incorporated the extensive clinical experience and interval publications since the prior (2011) version.

KEY RESULTS

Chicago Classification v3.0 utilizes a hierarchical approach, sequentially prioritizing: (i) disorders of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow (achalasia subtypes I-III and EGJ outflow obstruction), (ii) major disorders of peristalsis (absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus), and (iii) minor disorders of peristalsis characterized by impaired bolus transit. EGJ morphology, characterized by the degree of overlap between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm and baseline EGJ contractility are also part of CC v3.0. Compared to the previous CC version, the key metrics of interpretation, the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), the distal contractile integral (DCI), and the distal latency (DL) remain unchanged, albeit with much more emphasis on DCI for defining both hypo- and hypercontractility. New in CC v3.0 are: (i) the evaluation of the EGJ at rest defined in terms of morphology and contractility, (ii) 'fragmented' contractions (large breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour), (iii) ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and (iv) several minor adjustments in nomenclature and defining criteria. Absent in CC v3.0 are contractile front velocity and small breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour as defining characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Chicago Classification v3.0 is an updated analysis scheme for clinical esophageal HRM recordings developed by the International HRM Working Group.

摘要

背景

食管动力障碍的芝加哥分类法(CC)采用算法方案分析临床高分辨率测压(HRM)研究,已在全球范围内得到认可。

方法

由国际HRM工作组制定的2014年更新版CC v3.0纳入了自上一版(2011年)以来的丰富临床经验和期间发表的文献。

主要结果

芝加哥分类法v3.0采用分层方法,依次优先考虑:(i)食管胃交界(EGJ)流出道障碍(贲门失弛缓症I-III型和EGJ流出道梗阻),(ii)蠕动的主要障碍(无收缩、食管远端痉挛、食管高收缩),以及(iii)以食团通过受损为特征的蠕动的次要障碍。EGJ形态,以下食管括约肌与膈脚之间的重叠程度和EGJ基线收缩性为特征,也是CC v3.0的一部分。与之前的CC版本相比,解释的关键指标,即综合松弛压(IRP)、远端收缩积分(DCI)和远端潜伏期(DL)保持不变,尽管在定义收缩功能减退和亢进时更加强调DCI。CC v3.0的新内容包括:(i)根据形态和收缩性对静息状态下的EGJ进行评估,(ii)“碎片化”收缩(20 mmHg等压轮廓中的大中断),(iii)无效食管动力(IEM),以及(iv)在命名和定义标准方面的一些小调整。CC v3.0中没有将收缩前沿速度和20 mmHg等压轮廓中的小中断作为定义特征。

结论与推论

芝加哥分类法v3.0是国际HRM工作组开发的用于临床食管HRM记录的更新分析方案。

相似文献

1
The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
3
Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Chicago Classification in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry recordings.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):269-76. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12488. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
4
Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jan;33(1):e14058. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14058.
7
The Chicago classification of motility disorders: an update.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014 Oct;24(4):545-61. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders: Beyond Achalasia.
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jun 30;18(7):1399. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071399.
9
Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Aug;19(8):37. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0576-7.
10
High resolution manometry and new classification of esophageal motility disorders.
Ter Arkh. 2018 May 11;90(5):93-100. doi: 10.26442/terarkh201890593-100.

引用本文的文献

1
A mathematical model of human oesophageal motility function.
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 20;12(8):250491. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250491. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Real-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Jul 30;31(3):357-365. doi: 10.5056/jnm25010.
6
[Sex/Gender Differences in Esophageal Motility Disorders].
Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2024 Sep;24(3):298-300. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2024.0037. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
7
The conundrum of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction: Answers to key clinical questions.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Jul;1549(1):5-10. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15362. Epub 2025 Jun 1.
8
Better diagnostic accuracy for GERD observed with the new MNBI cutoff: an observational study in Vietnam.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 May 20;25(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03986-w.
9
Familial polyposis syndrome and achalasia in a young adult.
JPGN Rep. 2025 Jan 13;6(2):166-169. doi: 10.1002/jpr3.12161. eCollection 2025 May.
10
Evolving therapeutic approaches in achalasia: a comprehensive review of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs. Heller's myotomy.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 10;87(5):2855-2867. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003271. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
The four phases of esophageal bolus transit defined by high-resolution impedance manometry and fluoroscopy.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014 Aug 15;307(4):G437-44. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00148.2014. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
2
Flow time through esophagogastric junction derived during high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel parameter for assessing esophageal bolus transit.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014 Jul 15;307(2):G158-63. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00119.2014. Epub 2014 May 22.
3
Normal values for solid-state esophageal high-resolution manometry in a European population; an overview of all current metrics.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 May;26(5):654-9. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12314. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
4
Water-perfused esophageal high-resolution manometry: normal values and validation.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014 Mar;306(6):G491-5. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00447.2013. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
6
Automated impedance manometry analysis as a method to assess esophageal function.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 May;26(5):636-45. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12308. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
8
Inspiratory muscle training improves antireflux barrier in GERD patients.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013 Dec;305(11):G862-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00054.2013. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
9
Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1706-12. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.289. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
10
Swallowing dysfunction in healthy older people using pharyngeal pressure-flow analysis.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;26(1):59-68. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12224. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验