University of Leicester.
Universitat de Lleida and King's College London.
Br J Sociol. 2019 Jan;70(1):24-43. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12351. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
Since the early 2000s several European countries have introduced language and citizenship tests as new requirements for access to long-term residence or naturalization. The content of citizenship tests has been often presented as exclusionary in nature, in particular as it is based on the idea that access to citizenship has to be 'deserved'. In this paper, we aim to explore the citizenship tests 'from below', through the focus on the experience of migrants who prepare and take the 'Life in the UK' test, and with particular reference to how they relate to the idea of 'deservingness'. Through a set of in-depth interviews with migrants in two different cities (Leicester and London), we show that many of them use narratives in which they distinguish between the 'deserving citizens' and the 'undeserving Others' when they reflect upon their experience of becoming citizens. In so doing, they negotiate new hierarchies of inclusion into and exclusion from citizenship, which reflect broader neo-liberal and ethos-based conceptions of citizenship.
自 21 世纪初以来,一些欧洲国家已经引入语言和公民身份测试作为获得长期居留或入籍的新要求。公民身份测试的内容通常被认为具有排斥性,特别是因为它基于这样一种观点,即获得公民身份必须是“应得的”。在本文中,我们旨在通过关注为准备和参加“在英国生活”考试的移民的经历,从“底层”探索公民身份测试,特别是它们与“应得”的观念的关系。通过对两个不同城市(莱斯特和伦敦)的移民进行一系列深入访谈,我们表明,当他们反思自己成为公民的经历时,他们中的许多人在“应得的公民”和“不值得的他人”之间使用叙述来区分。通过这样做,他们协商了新的公民身份包容和排斥的等级制度,反映了更广泛的新自由主义和基于伦理的公民身份观念。