From the Department of Neurology (C.S., F.S., A.Z., G.N., M.D., R.S.) and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (C.S., F.S., A.Z., T.B., M.D., R.S., K.J.), University Hospital, LMU Munich; Schoen Klinik Bad Aibling (K.J.); and SyNergy (M.D.), Munich Cluster of Systems Neurology, Germany.
Neurology. 2018 Mar 20;90(12):e1021-e1028. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005168. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
To test whether quantitative gait analysis of gait under single- and dual-task conditions can be used for a differential diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).
In this cross-sectional study, temporal and spatial gait parameters were analyzed in 38 patients with PSP (Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Society for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy diagnostic criteria), 27 patients with iNPH (international iNPH guidelines), and 38 healthy controls. A pressure-sensitive carpet was used to examine gait under 5 conditions: single task (preferred, slow, and maximal speed), cognitive dual task (walking with serial 7 subtractions), and motor dual task (walking while carrying a tray).
The main results were as follows. First, both patients with PSP and those with iNPH exhibited significant gait dysfunction, which was worse in patients with iNPH with a more broad-based gait ( < 0.001). Second, stride time variability was increased in both patient groups, more pronounced in PSP ( = 0.009). Third, cognitive dual task led to a greater reduction of gait velocity in PSP (PSP 34.4% vs iNPH 16.9%, = 0.002). Motor dual task revealed a dissociation of gait performance: patients with PSP considerably worsened, but patients with iNPH tended to improve.
Patients with PSP seem to be more sensitive to dual-task perturbations than patients with iNPH. An increased step width and anisotropy of the effect of dual-task conditions (cognitive vs motor) seem to be good diagnostic tools for iNPH.
测试在单任务和双任务条件下进行定量步态分析是否可用于鉴别进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)和特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)。
在这项横断面研究中,分析了 38 例 PSP 患者(神经病学疾病和中风以及进行性核上性麻痹协会的诊断标准)、27 例 iNPH 患者(国际 iNPH 指南)和 38 名健康对照者的时间和空间步态参数。使用压力敏感地毯检查 5 种条件下的步态:单任务(首选、慢和最大速度)、认知双重任务(步行时连续减去 7)和运动双重任务(携带托盘行走)。
主要结果如下。首先,PSP 患者和 iNPH 患者均表现出明显的步态功能障碍,iNPH 患者步态更宽(<0.001)。其次,两组患者的步时变异性均增加,PSP 患者更为明显(=0.009)。第三,认知双重任务导致 PSP 患者的步行速度降低更为明显(PSP 为 34.4%,iNPH 为 16.9%,=0.002)。运动双重任务显示出步态表现的分离:PSP 患者明显恶化,而 iNPH 患者则倾向于改善。
与 iNPH 患者相比,PSP 患者似乎对双重任务干扰更为敏感。步宽增加和双重任务条件(认知与运动)的影响各向异性似乎是 iNPH 的良好诊断工具。