Department of Clinical Microbiology, Clinical Bacteriology, and Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018 Feb 7;8:27. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00027. eCollection 2018.
Cell-mediated immunity (CMI) is normally required for efficient protection against intracellular infections, however, identification of correlates is challenging and they are generally lacking. is a highly virulent, facultative intracellular bacterium and CMI is critically required for protection against the pathogen, but how this is effectuated in humans is poorly understood. To understand the protective mechanisms, we established an co-culture assay to identify how control of infection of is accomplished by human cells and hypothesized that the model will mimic immune mechanisms. Non-adherent peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were expanded with antigen and added to cultures with adherent PBMC infected with the human vaccine strain, LVS, or the highly virulent SCHU S4 strain. Intracellular numbers of was followed for 72 h and secreted and intracellular cytokines were analyzed. Addition of PBMC expanded from naïve individuals, i.e., those with no record of immunization to , generally resulted in little or no control of intracellular bacterial growth, whereas addition of PBMC from a majority of -immune individuals executed static and sometimes cidal effects on intracellular bacteria. Regardless of infecting strain, statistical differences between the two groups were significant, < 0.05. Secretion of 11 cytokines was analyzed after 72 h of infection and significant differences with regard to secretion of IFN-γ, TNF, and MIP-1β was observed between immune and naïve individuals for LVS-infected cultures. Also, in LVS-infected cultures, CD4 T cells from vaccinees, but not CD8 T cells, showed significantly higher expression of IFN-γ, MIP-1β, TNF, and CD107a than cells from naïve individuals. The co-culture system appears to identify correlates of immunity that are relevant for the understanding of mechanisms of the protective host immunity to .
细胞介导的免疫(CMI)通常是针对细胞内感染的有效保护所必需的,然而,相关因素的鉴定具有挑战性,并且通常缺乏相关因素。是一种高毒力、兼性细胞内细菌,CMI 对于保护宿主免受病原体的侵害至关重要,但是人类如何实现这一点还知之甚少。为了了解保护机制,我们建立了一种共生培养物测定法,以确定人类细胞如何控制的感染,并假设该模型将模拟的免疫机制。非粘附性外周血单核细胞(PBMC)用抗原扩增并添加到与粘附性 PBMC 共培养物中,该粘附性 PBMC 感染了人类疫苗株 LVS 或高毒力 SCHU S4 株。在 72 小时内监测 内的数量,并分析分泌和细胞内细胞因子。添加从无记忆个体(即没有免疫接种史的个体)扩增的 PBMC 通常导致对细胞内细菌生长的控制很少或没有,而添加大多数免疫个体的 PBMC 对细胞内细菌执行静态且有时杀菌作用。无论感染株如何,两组之间的统计差异均有统计学意义,<0.05。在感染后 72 小时分析了 11 种细胞因子的分泌情况,对于 LVS 感染的培养物,与免疫个体和无记忆个体相比,观察到 IFN-γ、TNF 和 MIP-1β 的分泌存在显著差异。此外,在 LVS 感染的培养物中,疫苗接种者的 CD4 T 细胞而不是 CD8 T 细胞,与无记忆个体的细胞相比,IFN-γ、MIP-1β、TNF 和 CD107a 的表达显著更高。共培养系统似乎可以识别与宿主保护性免疫机制相关的免疫相关因素。