Delvau N, Penaloza A, Liistro G, Thys F, Delattre I K, Hantson Philippe, Gianello P, Roy P M
Department of Emergency Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Pneumology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
J Med Toxicol. 2018 Jun;14(2):128-133. doi: 10.1007/s13181-018-0654-8. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
In an experimental study on carbon monoxide (CO) exposure in swine, we aimed to compare the influence of oxygen therapy using a non-rebreathing mask (NRM) to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and two pressure support ventilation (PSV) devices on the decrease of the terminal elimination half-life of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb t). This was the primary outcome.
Eight spontaneously breathing pigs were sedated by propofol and exposed to 940 ppm CO several times (n = 25) to obtain COHb levels of 30%. CPAPb (high flow open system, CPAP Boussignac® [7.5 cmHO]), PSV-Vy (open system, Vylife Boussignac®), and PSV-Leg (closed system, Legendair® [inspiratory/expiratory airway pressure 12/4 cmHO]) devices were used in a randomized order and compared to NRM (O at 15 l min) and atmospheric air (AA). The primary outcome was COHb t. Multiple comparisons were performed using Dunn's tests.
Median FiO and minute ventilation were significantly higher in the PSV-Leg group than the NRM group (p < 0.05). Median COHb t was 251, 85, 82, 93, and 58 min for AA, NRM, CPAPb, PSV-Vy, and PSV-Leg, respectively. All the interventions were superior to AA in terms of CO elimination (p < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference between CPAP or PSV and NRM. There was only a trend between PSV-Leg and NRM (p = 0.18). The median AUCs for ln (COHb) × time (h) were 170, 79, 83, 100, and 64 for AA, NRM, CPAPb, PSV-Vy, and PSV-Leg respectively, with a statistically significant difference only between AA and PSV-Leg (p = 0.002).
In conclusion, in our study on CO intoxication in swine, the use of the closed PSV-Leg system led to the shortest COHb t. These results suggest that PSV-Leg can be more efficient than NRM in eliminating CO and support the design of a clinical study to assess this hypothesis.
在一项关于猪一氧化碳(CO)暴露的实验研究中,我们旨在比较使用无重复呼吸面罩(NRM)进行氧疗与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)以及两种压力支持通气(PSV)设备对碳氧血红蛋白终末消除半衰期(COHb t)降低的影响。这是主要研究结果。
八只自主呼吸的猪用丙泊酚镇静,多次暴露于940 ppm的CO(n = 25),以使COHb水平达到30%。CPAPb(高流量开放系统,CPAP Boussignac® [7.5 cmH₂O])、PSV-Vy(开放系统,Vylife Boussignac®)和PSV-Leg(封闭系统,Legendair® [吸气/呼气气道压力12/4 cmH₂O])设备按随机顺序使用,并与NRM(15 l/min的氧气)和大气空气(AA)进行比较。主要研究结果为COHb t。使用邓恩检验进行多重比较。
PSV-Leg组的中位吸入氧分数(FiO₂)和分钟通气量显著高于NRM组(p < 0.05)。AA、NRM、CPAPb、PSV-Vy和PSV-Leg的COHb t中位数分别为251、85、82、93和58分钟。在CO消除方面,所有干预措施均优于AA(p < 0.001),但CPAP或PSV与NRM之间无统计学显著差异。PSV-Leg与NRM之间仅存在趋势差异(p = 0.18)。AA、NRM、CPAPb、PSV-Vy和PSV-Leg的ln(COHb)×时间(小时)的中位曲线下面积(AUC)分别为170、79、83、100和64,仅AA与PSV-Leg之间存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.002)。
总之,在我们关于猪CO中毒的研究中,使用封闭的PSV-Leg系统导致COHb t最短。这些结果表明,PSV-Leg在消除CO方面可能比NRM更有效,并支持设计一项临床研究来评估这一假设。