Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Apr;47(8):1213-1219. doi: 10.1111/apt.14579. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
The use of rifampicin for cholestatic pruritus is accompanied by concerns over safety, but the availability of real-world prescribing data is relatively limited.
We sought to describe the rate and characteristics of rifampicin-induced hepatitis in a mixed aetiology cohort of patients with established liver disease and cholestatic pruritus.
Retrospective review of records for out-patients commenced on rifampicin for pruritus 2012-2016 inclusive. Rifampicin-induced hepatitis was recorded where alanine aminotransferase activity (ALT) increased to both ≥5 × baseline and ≥5 × upper limit of normal (ULN), or to both ≥3 × baseline and ≥3 × ULN with concurrent elevation in serum bilirubin to ≥2 × baseline and ≥2 × ULN, in addition to a Roussel-Uclaf Causality Assessment Method score of "probable" or "highly probable" for rifampicin causality.
After exclusions, we reviewed 105 patients who took rifampicin for a median of 131 days. Most had primary biliary cholangitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis; 40 (38.1%) were men and median age was 44 years (IQR: 32-57). 44 (41.9%) patients had baseline serum bilirubin ≥2 × ULN and 28 (26.7%) ALT ≥3 × ULN. 5 (4.8%) developed rifampicin-induced hepatitis at a median of 70(range 27-130) days after drug initiation. No individual or laboratory baseline characteristics were significantly associated with subsequent development of hepatitis. All cases of hepatitis recovered after drug cessation, although one patient was hospitalised and received corticosteroids.
Given the efficacy of rifampicin for an important sub-group of those with cholestatic pruritus, adult patients, including those with jaundice, can be counselled that 95% of prescriptions are safe, and where hepatitis occurs, including at long latency, drug cessation appears effective.
利福平用于治疗胆汁淤积性瘙痒伴随安全性方面的担忧,但关于其实际应用的数据相对有限。
我们旨在描述在患有明确肝脏疾病和胆汁淤积性瘙痒的混合病因队列中,使用利福平治疗引起肝损伤的发生率和特征。
回顾性分析 2012 年至 2016 年期间门诊开始用利福平治疗瘙痒的患者记录。当丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)活性增加至≥5×基线和≥5×正常值上限(ULN),或增加至≥3×基线和≥3×ULN 同时血清胆红素升高至≥2×基线和≥2×ULN 时,记录利福平诱导性肝炎,此外,利福平因果关系评估方法(Roussel-Uclaf Causality Assessment Method)评分“可能”或“高度可能”。
排除后,我们共回顾了 105 例服用利福平的患者,中位治疗时间为 131 天。大多数患者患有原发性胆汁性胆管炎或原发性硬化性胆管炎;40 例(38.1%)为男性,中位年龄为 44 岁(IQR:32-57)。44 例(41.9%)患者基线血清胆红素≥2×ULN,28 例(26.7%)ALT≥3×ULN。5 例(4.8%)患者在开始治疗后中位时间 70 天(范围 27-130 天)时发生利福平诱导性肝炎。没有任何个体或实验室基线特征与随后发生肝炎显著相关。所有肝炎病例在停药后均恢复,尽管有 1 例患者住院并接受了皮质类固醇治疗。
鉴于利福平对胆汁淤积性瘙痒的一个重要亚组患者的疗效,包括有黄疸的成年患者,可以告知他们 95%的处方是安全的,并且在发生肝炎时,包括潜伏期较长的情况,停药似乎是有效的。