Suppr超能文献

胆汁酸结合剂、阿片类拮抗剂或利福平治疗胆汁淤积性瘙痒的疗效和安全性。

The efficacy and safety of bile Acid binding agents, opioid antagonists, or rifampin in the treatment of cholestasis-associated pruritus.

作者信息

Tandon Puneeta, Rowe Brian H, Vandermeer Ben, Bain Vincent G

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jul;102(7):1528-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01200.x. Epub 2007 Mar 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rifampin, opioid antagonists, or bile acid binding agents in the treatment of cholestasis-related pruritus (CAP) from available randomized controlled trial evidence.

METHODS

In addition to a comprehensive gray literature search, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched. Only full-text RCTs in participants (>75% adult) with CAP on at least one of the three medications were included. The primary outcome was change in pruritus score, recorded as a continuous or dichotomous outcome. Two independent reviewers performed trial selection and quality assessment.

RESULTS

From 487 citations, 12 RCTs were included. Rifampin (standardized mean difference [SMD]-1.62, 95% CI -3.05 to -0.18) and opioid antagonists (SMD -0.68, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.17) significantly reduced CAP. The two cholestyramine studies were too heterogeneous to pool. Although cholestyramine (P= 0.35) and rifampin (P= 0.96) were not associated with greater side effects compared with placebo, opioid antagonists were (number needed to harm = 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-25).

CONCLUSIONS

The available RCTs are small, few in number, and use varying scales for measuring pruritus. Although both opioid antagonists and rifampin demonstrated a reduction in pruritus, there were insufficient data to judge the efficacy of cholestyramine. Opioid antagonists were associated with transient side effects in a significant proportion of patients. A longer well-designed randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm the efficacy of bile acid binding agents and accurately assess adverse events.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是根据现有随机对照试验证据,评估利福平、阿片类拮抗剂或胆汁酸结合剂治疗胆汁淤积相关瘙痒(CAP)的疗效和安全性。

方法

除了全面检索灰色文献外,还检索了Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PubMed和Web of Science。纳入的研究仅为至少使用三种药物之一治疗CAP的参与者(>75%为成年人)的全文随机对照试验。主要结局为瘙痒评分的变化,记录为连续或二分结局。两名独立的评审员进行试验筛选和质量评估。

结果

从487篇文献中,纳入了12项随机对照试验。利福平(标准化均数差[SMD]-1.62,95%CI-3.05至-0.18)和阿片类拮抗剂(SMD-0.68,95%CI-1.19至-0.17)显著减轻了CAP。两项考来烯胺研究异质性太大,无法合并。虽然与安慰剂相比,考来烯胺(P=0.35)和利福平(P=0.96)与更多副作用无关,但阿片类拮抗剂却有关(伤害所需人数=2.6,95%CI 1.4-25)。

结论

现有的随机对照试验规模小、数量少,且使用不同的量表来测量瘙痒。虽然阿片类拮抗剂和利福平均显示瘙痒减轻,但考来烯胺疗效的数据不足。相当一部分患者中,阿片类拮抗剂会出现短暂的副作用。需要进行一项设计更完善的长期随机对照试验,以确认胆汁酸结合剂的疗效并准确评估不良事件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验