• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

万孚快速诊断试剂盒检测及影响因素分析评估

[Evaluation of Wondfo Rapid Diagnostic Kit for detecting and analysis of influencing factors].

作者信息

Feng Tang, Jian-Xia Tang, Feng Lu, Sui Xu, Ya-Ping Gu, De-Sheng Tong, Guo-Ding Zhu, Hai-Yong Hua, Hua-Yun Zhou, Jun Cao

机构信息

Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology, Wuxi 214064, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2016 Mar 21;28(2):146-150. doi: 10.16250/j.32.1374.2016022.

DOI:10.16250/j.32.1374.2016022
PMID:29469290
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the Wondfo Rapid Diagnostic Kit (Pf-LDH/Pan -pLDH) for detecting and analyze the influence of parasitaemia, concentration and polymorphism of pLDH on the performances.

METHODS

A total of 100 blood samples from patients confirmed by PCR were detected with the Wondfo Rapid Diagnostic Kit according to the manufacturers'instructions. The parasitaemia was determined by the microscopic examination. The concentration of pLDH was measured by ELISA tests. The LDH gene of was amplified by PCR and sequenced. The influence of these three factors on the positive rate was analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall positive rate of Wondfo Rapid Diagnostic Kit was 70.0% (70/100). The positive rate was 27.3% for the samples with parasitaemia ≤ 500 parasites/μl and reached 75.0%-75.4% when parasitaemia > 500 parasites/μl. The positive rate was 6.7% for samples with a low pLDH concentration ( values ≤ 0.100) and reached 95.1%-100% at a high pLDH concentration ( values > 0.100). The results of sequence analysis indicated that all the samples could be divided into 2 types, and . The gene homology of LDH between 2 types was 97%. There were 24 single nucleotide polymorphism (s) (SNPs) between 2 types, while only 3 SNPs were non-synonymous mutations. The homology of LDH amino acid sequences between 2 types was 99%; only 3 amino acids were different. The positive rates for and were 73.1% (38/52) and 66.7% (32/48) respectively; there was no statistically significant difference ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Wondfo Rapid Diagnostic Kit (Pf-LDH/Pan-pLDH) performs better than most of the similar products for the detection of , and the positive rates are closely related to the parasitaemia and concentration of pLDH, while no related to the polymorphism of pLDH gene.

摘要

目的

评估万孚快速诊断试剂盒(Pf-LDH/Pan-pLDH)检测疟原虫的性能,并分析疟原虫血症、pLDH浓度及多态性对检测性能的影响。

方法

按照试剂盒说明书,使用万孚快速诊断试剂盒对100例经PCR确诊患者的血样进行检测。通过显微镜检查确定疟原虫血症。采用ELISA法检测pLDH浓度。通过PCR扩增LDH基因并测序。分析这三个因素对阳性率的影响。

结果

万孚快速诊断试剂盒的总体阳性率为70.0%(70/100)。疟原虫血症≤500个/μl的样本阳性率为27.3%,疟原虫血症>500个/μl时阳性率达75.0% - 75.4%。pLDH浓度低(值≤0.100)的样本阳性率为6.7%,高浓度(值>0.100)时阳性率达95.1% - 100%。序列分析结果表明,所有样本可分为2种类型,即A和B。两种类型LDH的基因同源性为97%。两种类型之间有24个单核苷酸多态性(SNP),其中只有3个SNP是非同义突变。两种类型LDH氨基酸序列的同源性为99%;只有3个氨基酸不同。A和B型的阳性率分别为73.1%(38/52)和66.7%(32/48);差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

万孚快速诊断试剂盒(Pf-LDH/Pan-pLDH)在检测疟原虫方面比大多数同类产品性能更好,阳性率与疟原虫血症和pLDH浓度密切相关,而与pLDH基因多态性无关。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of Wondfo Rapid Diagnostic Kit for detecting and analysis of influencing factors].万孚快速诊断试剂盒检测及影响因素分析评估
Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2016 Mar 21;28(2):146-150. doi: 10.16250/j.32.1374.2016022.
2
Assessment of false negative rates of lactate dehydrogenase-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests for Plasmodium ovale detection.基于乳酸脱氢酶的疟原虫快速诊断检测用于检测卵形疟原虫的假阴性率评估。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Mar 11;13(3):e0007254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007254. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
Parasitological correlates of Plasmodium ovale curtisi and Plasmodium ovale wallikeri infection.卵形疟原虫柯蒂斯亚种和沃里克卵形疟原虫感染的寄生虫学关联
Malar J. 2016 Nov 10;15(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1601-2.
4
Evaluation of wondfo rapid diagnostic kit (Pf-HRP2/PAN-pLDH) for diagnosis of malaria by using nano-gold immunochromatographic assay.使用纳米金免疫层析法评估万孚快速诊断试剂盒(Pf-HRP2/PAN-pLDH)用于疟疾诊断的效果。
Acta Parasitol. 2014 Jun;59(2):267-71. doi: 10.2478/s11686-014-0238-y. Epub 2014 May 15.
5
Polymorphism analysis of propeller domain of k13 gene in Plasmodium ovale curtisi and Plasmodium ovale wallikeri isolates original infection from Myanmar and Africa in Yunnan Province, China.中国云南省从缅甸和非洲原代感染的卵形疟原虫 curtisi 和卵形疟原虫 wallikeri 分离株中 k13 基因的桨叶结构域多态性分析。
Malar J. 2020 Jul 13;19(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03317-2.
6
Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting.评价 CareStart pLDH 疟疾快速诊断检测试剂(Pf-pLDH/ pan-pLDH)在参照环境下用于疟疾诊断的效果。
Malar J. 2012 Jun 18;11:204. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-204.
7
Polymorphisms analysis of the Plasmodium ovale tryptophan-rich antigen gene (potra) from imported malaria cases in Henan Province.河南省输入性疟疾病例间卵形疟原虫色氨酸丰富抗原基因(potra)多态性分析。
Malar J. 2018 Mar 23;17(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2261-1.
8
Comparative evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, an antibody ELISA, and a pLDH ELISA in detecting asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia in blood donors in Buea, Cameroon.在喀麦隆布埃亚对献血者无症状疟原虫血症进行检测时,对一种快速诊断检测、一种抗体酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和一种疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶(pLDH)ELISA的比较评估。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Aug 1;6(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0314-2.
9
A comparison of two PCR protocols for the differentiation of Plasmodium ovale species and implications for clinical management in travellers returning to Germany: a 10-year cross-sectional study.两种 PCR 方案在鉴别卵形疟原虫种间差异的比较及其对返回德国旅行者临床管理的意义:一项为期 10 年的横断面研究。
Malar J. 2019 Aug 9;18(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2901-0.
10
Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test (CareStart Malaria HRP-2/pLDH (Pf/pan) Combo Test) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting.评价一种快速诊断检测方法(CareStart 疟疾 HRP-2/pLDH(Pf/pan)联合检测试剂)在参照环境下用于疟疾诊断的效果。
Malar J. 2010 Jun 18;9:171. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-171.