Suppr超能文献

评价 CareStart pLDH 疟疾快速诊断检测试剂(Pf-pLDH/ pan-pLDH)在参照环境下用于疟疾诊断的效果。

Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting.

机构信息

Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Malar J. 2012 Jun 18;11:204. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-204.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study evaluated CareStart pLDH Malaria, a three-band rapid diagnostic test detecting Plasmodium falciparum-specific parasite lactate dehydrogenase (Pf-pLDH) and pan Plasmodium-specific pLDH (pan-pLDH) in a reference setting.

METHODS

CareStart pLDH was retrospectively and prospectively assessed with a panel of stored (n=498) and fresh (n=77) blood samples obtained in international travelers suspected of malaria. Both panels comprised all four Plasmodium species; the retrospective panel comprised also Plasmodium negative samples. The reference method was microscopy corrected by PCR. The prospective panel was run side-to-side with OptiMAL (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) and SDFK60 (histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP-2)/pan-pLDH).

RESULTS

In the retrospective evaluation, overall sensitivity for P. falciparum samples (n=247) was 94.7%, reaching 98.7% for parasite densities>1,000/μl. Most false negative results occurred among samples with pure gametocytaemia (2/12, 16.7%) and at parasite densities ≤ 100/μl (7/12, 58.3%). None of the Plasmodium negative samples (n=96) showed visible test lines. Sensitivities for Plasmodium vivax (n=70), Plasmodium ovale (n=69) and Plasmodium malariae (n=16) were 74.3%, 31.9% and 25.0% respectively. Wrong species identification occurred in 10 (2.5%) samples and was mainly due to P. vivax samples reacting with the Pf-pLDH test line. Overall, Pf-pLDH test lines showed higher line intensities compared to the pan-pLDH lines (67.9% and 23.0% medium and strong line intensities for P. falciparum). In the prospective panel (77 Plasmodium-positive samples), CareStart pLDH showed higher sensitivities for P. falciparum compared to OptiMAL (p=0.008), lower sensitivities for P. falciparum as compare to SDFK60 (although not reaching statistical significance, p=0.08) and higher sensitivities for P. ovale compared to both OptiMAL (p=0.03) and SDFK60 (p=0.01). Inter-observer and test reproducibility were good to excellent.

CONCLUSION

CareStart pLDH performed excellent for the detection of P. falciparum, well for P. vivax, but poor for P. ovale and P. malariae.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了 CareStart pLDH Malaria,这是一种三带快速诊断检测试剂,用于检测恶性疟原虫特异性虫乳酸脱氢酶(Pf-pLDH)和泛恶性疟原虫特异性 pLDH(pan-pLDH)。

方法

在参考环境中,使用一组存储的(n=498)和新鲜的(n=77)血液样本,对 CareStart pLDH 进行回顾性和前瞻性评估,这些样本来自疑似疟疾的国际旅行者。两个检测板都包含所有四种疟原虫;回顾性检测板还包含疟原虫阴性样本。参考方法是通过 PCR 校正的显微镜检查。前瞻性检测板与 OptiMAL(Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH)和 SDFK60(富含组氨酸蛋白-2(HRP-2)/pan-pLDH)同时进行。

结果

在回顾性评估中,针对恶性疟原虫样本(n=247)的总体敏感性为 94.7%,对于寄生虫密度>1000/μl 的样本,敏感性达到 98.7%。大多数假阴性结果发生在纯配子体血症样本中(12 个样本中的 2 个,16.7%)和寄生虫密度≤100/μl 的样本中(12 个样本中的 7 个,58.3%)。没有一个疟原虫阴性样本(n=96)出现可见的测试线。间日疟原虫(n=70)、卵形疟原虫(n=69)和三日疟原虫(n=16)的敏感性分别为 74.3%、31.9%和 25.0%。10 个样本(2.5%)发生了错误的物种鉴定,主要是由于间日疟原虫样本与 Pf-pLDH 测试线反应所致。总体而言,Pf-pLDH 测试线的线强度高于 pan-pLDH 测试线(恶性疟原虫的中强度和高强度线强度分别为 67.9%和 23.0%)。在前瞻性检测板(77 个疟原虫阳性样本)中,CareStart pLDH 对恶性疟原虫的敏感性高于 OptiMAL(p=0.008),对恶性疟原虫的敏感性低于 SDFK60(尽管未达到统计学意义,p=0.08),对卵形疟原虫的敏感性高于 OptiMAL(p=0.03)和 SDFK60(p=0.01)。观察者间和测试重复性良好至极好。

结论

CareStart pLDH 对恶性疟原虫的检测表现出色,对间日疟原虫的检测也很好,但对卵形疟原虫和三日疟原虫的检测效果较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3e4/3464813/fbce6d0bd005/1475-2875-11-204-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验