a School of Psychological Sciences , Monash University , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.
b Department of Psychiatry , Monash University , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.
Aging Ment Health. 2019 May;23(5):633-642. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1439882. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
Limited research has been conducted into the identification of a valid and reliable screening measure for anxiety in aged care settings, despite it being one of the most common psychological conditions. This study aimed to determine an appropriate anxiety screening tool for aged care by comparing the reliability and validity of three commonly used measures and identifying specific cut-offs for the identification of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).
One-hundred and eighty nursing home residents (M age = 85.39 years) completed the GAI, HADS-A, and RAID, along with a structured diagnostic interview.
Twenty participants (11.1%) met DSM-5 criteria for GAD. All measures had good psychometric properties , although reliability estimates for the HADS-A were sub-optimal. Privileging sensitivity , the GAI cut-off score of 9 gave sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 86.3%; HADS-A cut-off of 6 gave sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 80.6%; and RAID cut-off of 11 gave sensitivity of 85.0% and specificity of 72.5%.
While all three measures had adequate reliability, validity, and cut-scores with high levels of sensitivity and specificity to detect anxiety within aged care, the GAI was the most consistently reliable and valid measure for screening for GAD.
尽管焦虑是老年人中最常见的心理状况之一,但针对老年护理环境中焦虑的有效和可靠筛查措施的研究却很少。本研究旨在通过比较三种常用测量方法的可靠性和有效性,并确定用于识别广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的特定界限值,从而确定适合老年护理的焦虑筛查工具。
180 名养老院居民(M 年龄=85.39 岁)完成了 GAI、HADS-A 和 RAID,以及结构化诊断访谈。
20 名参与者(11.1%)符合 DSM-5 中 GAD 的标准。所有测量方法都具有良好的心理测量特性,尽管 HADS-A 的可靠性估计值不理想。优先考虑灵敏度,GAI 的截断分数为 9 时,灵敏度为 90.0%,特异性为 86.3%;HADS-A 的截断分数为 6 时,灵敏度为 90.0%,特异性为 80.6%;RAID 的截断分数为 11 时,灵敏度为 85.0%,特异性为 72.5%。
虽然所有三种测量方法都具有足够的可靠性、有效性和截断分数,具有较高的灵敏度和特异性来检测老年护理中的焦虑,但 GAI 是用于筛查 GAD 的最可靠和有效的测量方法。