• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰主要创伤目的地政策的遵从情况:当前实践的审计。

Adherence to New Zealand's Major Trauma Destination Policy: an audit of current practice.

机构信息

Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Waipapa Taumata Rau | The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Hato Hone St John, Mt Wellington, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Paramedicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2024 Sep 27;137(1603):89-128. doi: 10.26635/6965.6594.

DOI:10.26635/6965.6594
PMID:39326022
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate adherence to the New Zealand Major Trauma Destination Policy (MTDP). This audit assessed if, based on their injuries, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) attended major trauma cases were taken to the MTDP determined appropriate hospital. Findings will guide and further improve pre-hospital trauma care and associated patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of adherence to the New Zealand MTDP for a random sample of 100 cases (ISS >12) injured between 31 November 2017-30 November 2018 who survived to hospital. The EMS electronic patient record (ePRF) was reviewed for each case. Adherence was indicated by the transport of injured patients from the scene to the appropriate initial destination based on meeting the respective regional MTDPs.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a 94% adherence rate to the MTDP. For patients that were not classified as requiring transport to an advanced-level trauma centre, there was a 98.9% (n=86/87) adherence compared to 61.5% (n=8/13) adherence in those that did require transport to an advanced-level trauma centre.

CONCLUSION

There was high adherence to the MTDP, with 94% of cases being taken to the appropriate destination directly from the incident scene. There is scope for improvement in cases whereby the nearest hospital should be bypassed in favour of a more distant advanced-level trauma centre.

摘要

目的

评估新西兰重大创伤转运政策(MTDP)的依从性。本次审计评估了根据伤害情况,紧急医疗服务(EMS)是否将重伤患者送往 MTDP 确定的适当医院。调查结果将指导和进一步改善院前创伤护理和相关患者结局。

方法

对 2017 年 11 月 31 日至 2018 年 11 月 30 日期间存活至医院的 100 例(ISS>12)随机抽样病例的新西兰 MTDP 依从性进行回顾性评估。对每个病例的 EMS 电子病历(ePRF)进行了回顾。如果根据各自的区域 MTDP 将受伤患者从现场转运至适当的初始目的地,则表示符合 MTDP 要求。

结果

总体而言,MTDP 的依从率为 94%。对于未被归类为需要转运至高级创伤中心的患者,有 98.9%(n=86/87)符合要求,而需要转运至高级创伤中心的患者中,只有 61.5%(n=8/13)符合要求。

结论

MTDP 的依从性很高,94%的病例直接从事故现场被送往适当的目的地。在某些情况下,应绕过最近的医院,选择更远的高级创伤中心,这方面仍有改进的空间。

相似文献

1
Adherence to New Zealand's Major Trauma Destination Policy: an audit of current practice.新西兰主要创伤目的地政策的遵从情况:当前实践的审计。
N Z Med J. 2024 Sep 27;137(1603):89-128. doi: 10.26635/6965.6594.
2
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Trauma Triage and Destination Plan on the Field Triage of Injured Patients in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州创伤分诊与转运计划在受伤患者现场分诊中的实施评估
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):591-604. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308606. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
3
Does destination make a difference? Outcomes after a policy change affecting cutoff times for prehospital transport.目的地有影响吗?一项影响院前转运截止时间的政策变化后的结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Sep 1;97(3):429-433. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004245. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
Monitoring pre-hospital transport of severely injured patients in the Midland Region of New Zealand.新西兰中部地区重伤患者的院前转运监测
N Z Med J. 2018 Feb 23;131(1470):71-78.
5
Comparison of outcomes for children with cervical spine injury based on destination hospital from scene of injury.基于受伤现场转运至的医院对儿童颈椎损伤治疗结果的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;21(1):55-64. doi: 10.1111/acem.12288.
6
Rural and Ethnic Disparities in Out-of-hospital Care and Transport Pathways After Road Traffic Trauma in New Zealand.新西兰道路交通伤害后院外护理和转运途径的农村和种族差异。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;25(4):602-613. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18366.
7
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients. Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage.受伤患者现场分诊指南。国家现场分诊专家小组的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009 Jan 23;58(RR-1):1-35.
8
The epidemiology of paediatric off-road motorcycle trauma attended by emergency medical services in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州急救医疗服务机构收治的儿童越野摩托车创伤的流行病学。
Injury. 2020 Sep;51(9):2016-2024. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.036. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
9
Effects of mode and time of EMS transport on the rate and distribution of dead on arrival among trauma population transported to ACSCOT-verified trauma centers in the United States.EMS 转运模式和时间对美国 ACSCOT 认证创伤中心转运创伤人群的到达即死率和分布的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.035. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
10
The role of emergency medical service providers in the decision-making process of prehospital trauma triage.紧急医疗服务提供者在院前创伤分诊决策过程中的作用。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):131-146. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1006-8. Epub 2018 Sep 20.