• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低候补名单美国透析提供者对新肾脏分配系统的认知。

Awareness of the New Kidney Allocation System among United States Dialysis Providers with Low Waitlisting.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 2018;47(2):115-119. doi: 10.1159/000486648. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1159/000486648
PMID:29471303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6261262/
Abstract

It is unknown whether dialysis facility staff are aware of the new kidney allocation system implemented in December 2014, which changed how deceased donor kidneys are allocated and waiting time is calculated. U.S. dialysis facilities with low annual waitlisting (<15.2%) were surveyed as part of a large randomized study. Among 653 facilities, 57.9% of staff were aware of the policy change, with medical directors (84.4%) being more aware than social workers (73.3%), facility administrators (53.1%), nurse managers (46.4%), and other staff (43.8%). Targeted education among dialysis facilities with low waitlisting may help extend the reach of the new policy.

摘要

目前尚不清楚透析中心的工作人员是否了解 2014 年 12 月实施的新的肾脏分配系统,该系统改变了已故供体肾脏的分配方式和等待时间的计算方式。美国透析中心作为一项大型随机研究的一部分,对每年等候名单人数较低(<15.2%)的透析中心进行了调查。在 653 家透析中心中,有 57.9%的工作人员了解这项政策的变化,其中医疗主任(84.4%)比社工(73.3%)、机构管理人员(53.1%)、护士长(46.4%)和其他工作人员(43.8%)更了解该政策。在等候名单人数较低的透析中心进行有针对性的教育,可能有助于扩大新政策的覆盖面。

相似文献

1
Awareness of the New Kidney Allocation System among United States Dialysis Providers with Low Waitlisting.低候补名单美国透析提供者对新肾脏分配系统的认知。
Am J Nephrol. 2018;47(2):115-119. doi: 10.1159/000486648. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
2
Awareness of Racial Disparities in Kidney Transplantation among Health Care Providers in Dialysis Facilities.透析医疗机构医护人员对肾脏移植中种族差异的认知。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 May 7;13(5):772-781. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09920917. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
3
The ASCENT Intervention to Improve Access and Reduce Racial Inequalities in Kidney Waitlisting: A Randomized, Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.ASCENT 干预措施改善肾脏候补名单中的可及性和减少种族不平等:一项随机、有效性-实施试验。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):374-382. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000071. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
The ASCENT (Allocation System Changes for Equity in Kidney Transplantation) Study: a Randomized Effectiveness-Implementation Study to Improve Kidney Transplant Waitlisting and Reduce Racial Disparity.ASCENT(肾脏移植公平性分配系统变革)研究:一项旨在改善肾脏移植等待名单并减少种族差异的随机有效性-实施研究。
Kidney Int Rep. 2017 May;2(3):433-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
Racial/ethnic disparities in waitlisting for deceased donor kidney transplantation 1 year after implementation of the new national kidney allocation system.新国家肾脏分配系统实施 1 年后,等待接受已故供体肾脏移植的种族/民族差异。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug;18(8):1936-1946. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14748. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
Transplantation of Patients With Long Dialysis Vintage in the Current Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation System (KAS).在现行的已故供者肾脏分配系统(KAS)中,移植长期透析患者。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Sep;80(3):319-329.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.01.429. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Dialysis Facility Transplant Philosophy and Access to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeast.东南部透析机构的移植理念与肾移植途径
Am J Nephrol. 2015;41(6):504-11. doi: 10.1159/000438463. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
8
Referral and Evaluation for Kidney Transplantation Following Implementation of the 2014 National Kidney Allocation System.2014 年国家肾脏分配系统实施后肾脏移植的转介和评估。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Dec;80(6):707-717. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.01.423. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
9
Racial disparities in preemptive waitlisting and deceased donor kidney transplantation: Ethics and solutions.种族差异与优先候补和已故供体肾移植:伦理与解决方案。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):958-967. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16392. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
10
Variation in Dialysis Facility Referral for Kidney Transplantation Among Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease in Georgia.佐治亚州终末期肾病患者肾移植透析机构转诊情况的差异
JAMA. 2015 Aug 11;314(6):582-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8897.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of the ASCENT Trial to Improve Transplant Waitlisting Access.实施ASCENT试验以改善移植等待名单的获取情况。
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Nov 2;9(2):225-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.10.028. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Community Engagement to Improve Equity in Kidney Transplantation from the Ground Up: the Southeastern Kidney Transplant Coalition.自下而上地通过社区参与改善肾移植公平性:东南肾移植联盟
Curr Transplant Rep. 2021 Dec;8(4):324-332. doi: 10.1007/s40472-021-00346-x. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
3
Impact of Change in Allocation Score Methodology on Post Kidney Transplant Average Length of Stay.分配评分方法的变化对肾移植术后平均住院时间的影响。
J Clin Med Res. 2022 Mar;14(3):111-118. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4673. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
Improving Access to Kidney Transplantation: Perspectives From Dialysis and Transplant Staff in the Southeastern United States.改善肾脏移植可及性:美国东南部透析与移植工作人员的观点
Kidney Med. 2021 Jul 7;3(5):799-807.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.04.017. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
5
Patients prioritize waitlist over posttransplant outcomes when evaluating kidney transplant centers.当评估肾移植中心时,患者更看重候补名单而不是移植后的结果。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2781-2790. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14985. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The ASCENT (Allocation System Changes for Equity in Kidney Transplantation) Study: a Randomized Effectiveness-Implementation Study to Improve Kidney Transplant Waitlisting and Reduce Racial Disparity.ASCENT(肾脏移植公平性分配系统变革)研究:一项旨在改善肾脏移植等待名单并减少种族差异的随机有效性-实施研究。
Kidney Int Rep. 2017 May;2(3):433-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
2
New Kidney Allocation System Associated With Increased Rates Of Transplants Among Black And Hispanic Patients.新的肾脏分配系统与黑人和西班牙裔患者移植率的提高有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jun 1;36(6):1078-1085. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1625.
3
Changes in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation One Year After KAS Implementation.KAS实施一年后 deceased donor kidney transplantation的变化 。 注:“deceased donor kidney transplantation”常见释义为“ deceased donor kidney transplantation” ;“KAS”未明确全称,可根据具体背景确定准确含义。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jun;16(6):1834-47. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13770. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
Assessing Transplant Education Practices in Dialysis Centers: Comparing Educator Reported and Medicare Data.评估透析中心的移植教育实践:比较教育工作者报告的数据和医疗保险数据。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):1617-25. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09851014. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
5
Dialysis Facility Transplant Philosophy and Access to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeast.东南部透析机构的移植理念与肾移植途径
Am J Nephrol. 2015;41(6):504-11. doi: 10.1159/000438463. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
6
Modifiable patient characteristics and racial disparities in evaluation completion and living donor transplant.可改变的患者特征与评估完成情况和活体供者移植中的种族差异。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jun;8(6):995-1002. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08880812. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
7
Disparities in provision of transplant education by profit status of the dialysis center.透析中心盈利状况对移植教育提供情况的差异。
Am J Transplant. 2012 Nov;12(11):3104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04207.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.