Bakker-van Gijssel Esther J, Lucassen Peter L B J, Olde Hartman Tim C, Assendelft Willem J J, van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk Henny M J
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Siza, Residential Care Facility for People with Disabilities, AM Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 18;35(5):599-606. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy004.
People with intellectual disabilities (IDs) experience health inequalities. Applying health assessments is one way of diminishing these inequalities. A health assessment instrument can support general practitioners (GPs) in providing better medical care to people with ID.
The aim of this study was to determine which items should be part of a health assessment instrument for people with ID to be used in primary care.
This Delphi consensus study was conducted among 24 GP experts and 21 ID physicians. We performed three anonymous sequential online questionnaire rounds. We started with 82 'general' items and 14 items concerning physical and additional examinations derived from the international literature and a focus group study among Dutch GPs. We definitely included items if more than 75% of the GP experts agreed on their inclusion.
The participation rate in all rounds was above 88%. The expert groups proposed 10 new items. Consensus was reached on 64 'general' items related to highly prevalent diseases, public health and health promotion. Consensus was also reached on 18 physical and additional examination items.
For the first time, experts in a Delphi study were able to arrive at a selection of items for a health assessment instrument for people with ID. The overall agreement among the GPs and ID physicians was good. Because the experts prefer that patients complete the health assessment questionnaire at home, questions that cover these items must be formulated clearly.
智力残疾者存在健康不平等问题。应用健康评估是减少这些不平等的一种方式。一种健康评估工具可以帮助全科医生为智力残疾者提供更好的医疗服务。
本研究的目的是确定哪些项目应成为用于初级保健的智力残疾者健康评估工具的一部分。
这项德尔菲共识研究是在24名全科医生专家和21名智力残疾医生中进行的。我们进行了三轮匿名的在线问卷调查。我们从82个“一般”项目以及14个关于身体检查和额外检查的项目开始,这些项目来自国际文献以及一项针对荷兰全科医生的焦点小组研究。如果超过75%的全科医生专家同意纳入某个项目,我们就明确将其纳入。
所有轮次的参与率均超过88%。专家小组提出了10个新项目。就64个与高发性疾病、公共卫生和健康促进相关的“一般”项目达成了共识。就18个身体检查和额外检查项目也达成了共识。
在德尔菲研究中,专家们首次能够为智力残疾者的健康评估工具选出一系列项目。全科医生和智力残疾医生之间的总体一致性良好。由于专家们希望患者在家中完成健康评估问卷,因此必须清晰地表述涵盖这些项目的问题。