Suppr超能文献

全科医生对智障人士健康评估工具的看法:一项定性研究。

GPs' opinions of health assessment instruments for people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Bakker-van Gijssel Esther J, Olde Hartman Tim C, Lucassen Peter Lbj, van den Driessen Mareeuw Francine, Dees Marianne K, Assendelft Willem Jj, van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk Henny Mj

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and Siza (residential care facility for people with disabilities), Arnhem, the Netherlands.

Department of Primary and Community Care.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan;67(654):e41-e48. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688585. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GPs provide health care to people with intellectual disabilities (ID). People with ID find it difficult to express themselves concerning health-related matters. Applying health assessments is an effective method to reveal health needs, and can play a role in prevention and health promotion.

AIM

The aim of this qualitative study was to explore GPs' considerations about applying a health assessment for people with ID.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This focus group study was conducted among a selection of Dutch GPs.

METHOD

An interview guide was developed. All discussions were audiorecorded and transcribed. Analysis was performed using the framework analysis approach. Two researchers independently applied open coding and identified a thematic framework. This framework and the summaries of views per theme were discussed in the research team.

RESULTS

After four focus groups, with 23 GPs, saturation was reached. Three main themes evolved: health assessments in relation to GPs' responsibility; the usefulness and necessity of health assessments; and barriers to using health assessments on people with ID. A health assessment instrument for people with ID can help GPs to focus on certain issues that are not so common in the general population. GPs are motivated to use such a tool if it is scientifically tested, and results in significant health gains. However, GPs identify barriers at the level of GP, patient, and organisation.

CONCLUSION

Most GPs in the focus groups consider providing medical care to people with ID their responsibility and indicate that a health assessment instrument could be a valuable tool. In order to deliver good care, they need education and support. Many barriers need to be overcome before a health assessment instrument can be implemented.

摘要

背景

全科医生为智障人士提供医疗保健服务。智障人士在表达与健康相关的问题时存在困难。应用健康评估是揭示健康需求的有效方法,并且在预防和健康促进方面能够发挥作用。

目的

这项定性研究的目的是探讨全科医生对于对智障人士应用健康评估的考虑因素。

设计与背景

这项焦点小组研究是在一群荷兰全科医生中开展的。

方法

制定了一份访谈指南。所有讨论都进行了录音和转录。采用框架分析法进行分析。两名研究人员独立进行开放式编码并确定了一个主题框架。该框架以及每个主题的观点总结在研究团队中进行了讨论。

结果

在有23名全科医生参与的四个焦点小组之后,达到了饱和状态。形成了三个主要主题:与全科医生职责相关的健康评估;健康评估的有用性和必要性;以及对智障人士使用健康评估的障碍。针对智障人士的健康评估工具可以帮助全科医生关注普通人群中不那么常见的某些问题。如果经过科学测试且能带来显著的健康益处,全科医生有动力使用这样的工具。然而,全科医生在全科医生、患者和组织层面都发现了障碍。

结论

焦点小组中的大多数全科医生认为为智障人士提供医疗服务是他们的职责,并表示健康评估工具可能是一个有价值的工具。为了提供良好的护理,他们需要教育和支持。在实施健康评估工具之前,需要克服许多障碍。

相似文献

1
GPs' opinions of health assessment instruments for people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan;67(654):e41-e48. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688585. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
5
GPs' perspectives on preventive care for older people: a focus group study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Nov;62(604):e765-72. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X658296.
6
Doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability--a qualitative study.
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Dec 17;10:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-82.
7
Health information exchange for patients with intellectual disabilities: a general practice perspective.
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Oct;66(651):e720-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X686593. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
9
Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs.
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e887-e895. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687565. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
10
Rural GPs' attitudes toward participating in emergency medicine: a qualitative study.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):377-384. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1249047. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

2
Primary mental healthcare for adults with mild intellectual disabilities: Patients' perspectives.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2354414. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2354414. Epub 2024 May 17.
5
Primary mental healthcare for adults with mild intellectual disabilities: a Dutch database study.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):234-241. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2142936.
7
Quality of health care according to people with Down syndrome, their parents and support staff-A qualitative exploration.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 May;33(3):496-514. doi: 10.1111/jar.12692. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
Improving knowledge of psychotropic prescribing in people with Intellectual Disability in primary care.
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 14;13(9):e0204178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204178. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

3
Practice nurse health checks for adults with intellectual disabilities: a cluster-design, randomised controlled trial.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;1(7):511-21. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00078-9. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
4
Mortality of People with Intellectual Disabilities in England: A Comparison of Data from Existing Sources.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2015 Sep;28(5):414-22. doi: 10.1111/jar.12192.
5
Optimizing the uptake of health checks for people with intellectual disabilities.
J Intellect Disabil. 2015 Sep;19(3):205-14. doi: 10.1177/1744629514568437. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
6
The impact of health checks for people with intellectual disabilities: an updated systematic review of evidence.
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Oct;35(10):2450-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
7
To score or not to score: a qualitative study on GPs views on the use of instruments for depression.
Fam Pract. 2014 Apr;31(2):215-21. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt082. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
8
The need for FASTER CARE in the diagnosis of illness in people with intellectual disabilities.
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;63(617):661-2. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675593.
9
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
10
Meeting the needs of patients with learning disabilities.
BMJ. 2013 May 29;346:f3421. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3421.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验