Deans Katherine J, Minneci Peter C, Nacion Kristine M, Leonhart Karen, Cooper Jennifer N, Scholle Sarah Hudson, Kelleher Kelly J
The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, FB3145, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
National Quality Forum, 1030 15th Street NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC, 20005, USA.
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 22;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1064-4.
Preventive quality measures for the foster care population are largely untested. The objective of the study is to identify healthcare quality measures for young children and adolescents in foster care and to test whether the data required to calculate these measures can be feasibly extracted and interpreted within an electronic health records or within the Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System.
The AAP Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric Health Care served as the guideline for determining quality measures. Quality measures related to well child visits, developmental screenings, immunizations, trauma-related care, BMI measurements, sexually transmitted infections and depression were defined. Retrospective chart reviews were performed on a cohort of children in foster care from a single large pediatric institution and related county. Data available in the Ohio Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System was compared to the same population studied in the electronic health record review. Quality measures were calculated as observed (received) to expected (recommended) ratios (O/E ratios) to describe the actual quantity of recommended health care that was received by individual children.
Electronic health records and the Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System data frequently lacked important information on foster care youth essential for calculating the measures. Although electronic health records were rich in encounter specific clinical data, they often lacked custodial information such as the dates of entry into and exit from foster care. In contrast, Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System included robust data on custodial arrangements, but lacked detailed medical information. Despite these limitations, several quality measures were devised that attempted to accommodate these limitations.
In this feasibility testing, neither the electronic health records at a single institution nor the county level Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System was able to independently serve as a reliable source of data for health care quality measures for foster care youth. However, the ability to leverage both sources by matching them at an individual level may provide the complement of data necessary to assess the quality of healthcare.
寄养人群的预防性质量措施在很大程度上未经检验。本研究的目的是确定寄养儿童和青少年的医疗质量措施,并测试计算这些措施所需的数据能否在电子健康记录或全州自动化儿童福利信息系统中切实提取和解读。
美国儿科学会预防性儿童保健建议作为确定质量措施的指南。定义了与健康儿童访视、发育筛查、免疫接种、创伤相关护理、体重指数测量、性传播感染和抑郁症相关的质量措施。对来自一个大型儿科机构和相关县的一组寄养儿童进行了回顾性病历审查。将俄亥俄州全州自动化儿童福利信息系统中的可用数据与电子健康记录审查中研究的同一人群的数据进行比较。质量措施以观察到(接受)与预期(推荐)的比率(O/E比率)来计算,以描述个体儿童接受推荐医疗保健的实际数量。
电子健康记录和全州自动化儿童福利信息系统的数据经常缺乏计算这些措施所需的关于寄养青年的重要信息。虽然电子健康记录包含丰富的特定就诊临床数据,但它们往往缺乏监护信息,如进入和离开寄养的日期。相比之下,全州自动化儿童福利信息系统包含关于监护安排的详细数据,但缺乏详细的医疗信息。尽管存在这些限制,但仍设计了一些质量措施来试图适应这些限制。
在这项可行性测试中,单个机构的电子健康记录和县级全州自动化儿童福利信息系统都不能独立作为寄养青年医疗质量措施的可靠数据来源。然而,通过在个体层面将这两个来源进行匹配来利用它们的能力可能提供评估医疗质量所需的数据补充。