Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Children's Health, Dallas, Texas.
Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021 Apr;34(2):190-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
In this study we evaluated published studies about foster care to: (1) determine the types of data used; (2) describe the degree to which a sexual/reproductive health topic was addressed; and (3) describe the consent process.
Analysis of published literature.
PubMed was searched using "foster care" for English articles published between January 1, 2017 and September 4, 2019.
None.
None.
Articles were coded into 4 data source categories: primary, secondary, peripheral, or perspective data. Articles with a primary data source were coded for participant ages: only 9 years old and younger, 10- to 17-year-olds (minor adolescents), and only 18 years old and older. Articles using a secondary data source were coded for the source of the data registry. All articles were coded for presence of a sexual/reproductive health outcome. The primary data articles that included minor adolescents were coded for the study topic and consent process.
Of the 176 articles about foster care, 72/176 (41%) used primary data, 53/176 (30%) used secondary data, and 51/176 (29%) used peripheral/perspective data. Forty-eight of the primary data articles included minor adolescents. Secondary data sources included few national research surveys. Sexual/reproductive health outcomes were measured in 17 articles, 4 of which used primary data. The consent process for minor adolescents varied and had no consistent pattern across studies.
Research on best practices for consent processes and use of registries could be developed to increase research on sexual/reproductive health outcomes among adolescents in foster care.
本研究评估了已发表的有关寄养的研究,以:(1)确定使用的数据类型;(2)描述性/生殖健康主题的解决程度;(3)描述同意过程。
已发表文献分析。
在 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 9 月 4 日期间,在 PubMed 上使用“寄养”搜索英文文章。
无。
无。
文章分为 4 个数据源类别进行编码:主要、次要、外围或透视数据。具有主要数据源的文章按参与者年龄进行编码:仅 9 岁及以下、10 至 17 岁(未成年青少年)和仅 18 岁及以上。使用二次数据来源的文章对数据登记处的来源进行编码。所有文章均对性/生殖健康结果进行编码。包括未成年青少年的主要数据文章按研究主题和同意过程进行编码。
在 176 篇关于寄养的文章中,72/176(41%)使用了主要数据,53/176(30%)使用了次要数据,51/176(29%)使用了外围/透视数据。48 篇主要数据文章包括未成年青少年。次要数据源包括少数全国性研究调查。有 17 篇文章测量了性/生殖健康结果,其中 4 篇使用了主要数据。未成年青少年的同意过程各不相同,各研究之间没有一致的模式。
可以制定关于同意程序和使用登记册的最佳实践的研究,以增加对寄养中青少年性/生殖健康结果的研究。