• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设定 IMPACT(改善临床试验数据获取)观测站基线。

Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Feb 15;28(1):010201. doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.010201.

DOI:10.11613/BM.2018.010201
PMID:29472799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5806612/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the IMPACT (IMProving Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory is to assess the transformation of clinical trials (CT) related to the evolution of sharing of CT data. The objective of this study is to establish a baseline for monitoring CT data sharing by the Observatory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this scoping review we searched for publications that address sharing, dissemination, transparency or reuse of CT data published prior to December 31st 2000. Two authors screened titles and abstracts of 1204 records received by Medline searches and added 47 publications from direct discovery. Four researchers extracted, coded, and analyzed the predefined information from 102 selected papers.

RESULTS

We found a growing recognition of the importance of data sharing prior to 2001. However, there were numerous obstacles including the ambiguity of the concept of data sharing, the absence of specific terminology and the lack of an "open" culture. By the end of 2000, data, metadata, and evidence based medicine were defined. Data sharing, registries, databases and re-analyses of individual patient data (IPD) emerged. The use of systematic reviews and IPD meta-analysis in decision making was promoted. Most arguments for broader data sharing came from oncology, paediatrics, rare diseases, AIDS, pregnancy, perinatal medicine, and media reporting related scandals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the year 2000 could be used as a baseline for monitoring the evolution of CT data sharing as basic prerequisites were set in place, including greater understanding that CT data sharing is essential for decision making and the advancements of the Internet.

摘要

简介

IMPACT(改善临床试验数据获取)观测站的目的是评估与临床试验数据共享演变相关的临床试验(CT)变革。本研究的目的是为观测站监测 CT 数据共享建立一个基线。

材料和方法

在这项范围性综述中,我们搜索了发表于 2000 年 12 月 31 日之前的关于 CT 数据共享、传播、透明度或再利用的出版物。两名作者筛选了 Medline 搜索收到的 1204 条记录的标题和摘要,并从直接发现中添加了 47 篇出版物。四名研究人员从 102 篇选定的论文中提取、编码和分析了预设信息。

结果

我们发现,在 2001 年之前,人们越来越认识到数据共享的重要性。然而,存在许多障碍,包括数据共享概念的模糊性、缺乏特定术语以及缺乏“开放”文化。到 2000 年底,数据、元数据和循证医学已经得到定义。数据共享、注册处、数据库和个体患者数据(IPD)的重新分析已经出现。促进了在决策中使用系统评价和 IPD 荟萃分析。更广泛的数据共享的大多数论点来自肿瘤学、儿科学、罕见疾病、艾滋病、妊娠、围产期医学以及与媒体报道相关的丑闻。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,2000 年可以用作监测 CT 数据共享演变的基线,因为已经建立了基本的前提条件,包括更深入地理解 CT 数据共享对于决策制定的重要性以及互联网的进步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a9/5806612/df8b95737c19/bm-28-1-010201-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a9/5806612/70289ee12326/bm-28-1-010201-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a9/5806612/20f33ecd4e23/bm-28-1-010201-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a9/5806612/2db85b9b078d/bm-28-1-010201-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a9/5806612/df8b95737c19/bm-28-1-010201-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a9/5806612/70289ee12326/bm-28-1-010201-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a9/5806612/20f33ecd4e23/bm-28-1-010201-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a9/5806612/2db85b9b078d/bm-28-1-010201-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a9/5806612/df8b95737c19/bm-28-1-010201-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline.设定 IMPACT(改善临床试验数据获取)观测站基线。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Feb 15;28(1):010201. doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.010201.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
IMPACT Observatory: tracking the evolution of clinical trial data sharing and research integrity.IMPACT观测站:追踪临床试验数据共享和研究诚信的演变
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016 Oct 15;26(3):308-307. doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.035.
5
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
Obtaining and managing data sets for individual participant data meta-analysis: scoping review and practical guide.个体参与者数据荟萃分析中获取和管理数据集:范围综述与实用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 12;20(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00964-6.
7
Efficacy of artemisinin-based and quinine-based treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy: a protocol for systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis.基于青蒿素和奎宁的治疗方案对妊娠合并无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾的疗效:系统评价和个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 22;9(8):e027503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027503.
8
Predictors of clinical trial data sharing: exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional survey.临床试验数据共享的预测因素:横断面调查的探索性分析
Trials. 2014 Oct 2;15:384. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-384.
9
Characteristics of available studies and dissemination of research using major clinical data sharing platforms.可用研究的特征和利用主要临床数据共享平台进行的研究传播。
Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;18(6):657-666. doi: 10.1177/17407745211038524. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
10
Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.临床研究注册在麻醉学系统评价中的应用:对发表在麻醉学期刊和 Cochrane 图书馆中的系统评价进行的横断面研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;34(12):797-807. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000671.

本文引用的文献

1
IMPACT Observatory: tracking the evolution of clinical trial data sharing and research integrity.IMPACT观测站:追踪临床试验数据共享和研究诚信的演变
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016 Oct 15;26(3):308-307. doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.035.
2
Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments.奥司他韦治疗成人和儿童流感:临床研究报告的系统评价和监管意见摘要。
BMJ. 2014 Apr 9;348:g2545. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2545.
3
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.
利用自然实验评估人群健康干预措施:英国医学研究理事会新指南。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1182-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375. Epub 2012 May 10.
4
History of evidence-based medicine.循证医学的历史。
Indian J Urol. 2011 Oct;27(4):487-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.91438.
5
The ISRCTN Register: achievements and challenges 8 years on.ISRCTN 注册处:8 年成就与挑战
J Evid Based Med. 2011;4(3):188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2011.01138.x.
6
Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review.考科蓝系统评价更新。考科蓝系统评价的“界定范围”
J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Mar;33(1):147-50. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015.
7
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.范围研究:方法学的推进。
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
8
Clinical trial registration: the differing views of industry, the WHO, and the Ottawa Group.临床试验注册:行业、世界卫生组织和渥太华小组的不同观点。
PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020378. Epub 2005 Oct 18.
9
Insulin aspart: a new rapid-acting insulin analog.门冬胰岛素:一种新型速效胰岛素类似物。
Ann Pharmacother. 2000 Dec;34(12):1423-31. doi: 10.1345/aph.19414.
10
Better access to information about clinical trials.更好地获取有关临床试验的信息。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 17;133(8):609-14. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00013.