Varella Andrea C, Talbert Luther E, Achhami Buddhi B, Blake Nancy K, Hofland Megan L, Sherman Jamie D, Lamb Peggy F, Reddy Gadi V P, Weaver David K
Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
J Econ Entomol. 2018 Apr 2;111(2):923-930. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy025.
Most barley cultivars have some degree of resistance to the wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Damage caused by WSS is currently observed in fields of barley grown in the Northern Great Plains, but the impact of WSS damage among cultivars due to genetic differences within the barley germplasm is not known. Specifically, little is known about the mechanisms underlying WSS resistance in barley. We characterized WSS resistance in a subset of the spring barley CAP (Coordinated Agricultural Project) germplasm panel containing 193 current and historically important breeding lines from six North American breeding programs. Panel lines were grown in WSS infested fields for two consecutive years. Lines were characterized for stem solidness, stem cutting, WSS infestation (antixenosis), larval mortality (antibiosis), and parasitism (indirect plant defense). Variation in resistance to WSS in barley was compared to observations made for solid-stemmed resistant and hollow-stemmed susceptible wheat lines. Results indicate that both antibiosis and antixenosis are involved in the resistance of barley to the WSS, but antibiosis seems to be more prevalent. Almost all of the barley lines had greater larval mortality than the hollow-stemmed wheat lines, and only a few barley lines had mortality as low as that observed in the solid-stemmed wheat line. Since barley lines lack solid stems, it is apparent that barley has a different form of antibiosis. Our results provide information for use of barley in rotation to control the WSS and may provide a basis for identification of new approaches for improving WSS resistance in wheat.
大多数大麦品种对麦茎蜂(WSS),即Cephus cinctus Norton(膜翅目:茎蜂科)具有一定程度的抗性。目前在大平原北部种植的大麦田中观察到了麦茎蜂造成的损害,但由于大麦种质内的遗传差异,麦茎蜂损害对不同品种的影响尚不清楚。具体而言,关于大麦抗麦茎蜂的潜在机制知之甚少。我们对春季大麦CAP(协调农业项目)种质面板中的一个子集进行了麦茎蜂抗性特征分析,该面板包含来自六个北美育种项目的193个当前及历史上重要的育种系。这些品系连续两年种植在受麦茎蜂侵染的田地里。对品系的茎秆坚实度、茎秆切割情况、麦茎蜂侵染(排趋性)、幼虫死亡率(抗生性)和寄生情况(间接植物防御)进行了特征分析。将大麦对麦茎蜂的抗性变化与对实心茎抗性和空心茎感病小麦品系的观察结果进行了比较。结果表明,抗生性和排趋性都参与了大麦对麦茎蜂的抗性,但抗生性似乎更为普遍。几乎所有的大麦品系幼虫死亡率都高于空心茎小麦品系,只有少数大麦品系的死亡率与实心茎小麦品系观察到的死亡率一样低。由于大麦品系缺乏实心茎,很明显大麦具有不同形式的抗生性。我们的结果为利用大麦进行轮作以控制麦茎蜂提供了信息,并可能为确定提高小麦对麦茎蜂抗性的新方法提供基础。