• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告的复杂性区域疼痛综合征汉密尔顿量表的内容效度:复杂性区域疼痛综合征汉密尔顿量表的内容效度,一种患者报告结果的测量方法。

Content validation of the Patient-Reported Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Validité de contenu du Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, une mesure des résultats déclarés par le patient.

作者信息

Packham Tara L, MacDermid Joy C, Michlovitz Susan L, Buckley Norman

出版信息

Can J Occup Ther. 2018 Apr;85(2):99-105. doi: 10.1177/0008417417734562. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1177/0008417417734562
PMID:29475370
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a perplexing neurological condition, and persons with CRPS experience substantial loss of daily roles and activities. A condition-specific measure is being developed to evaluate CRPS.

PURPOSE

We describe the use of cognitive interviews to examine content validity of this patient-reported outcome measure for CRPS.

METHOD

Interviews with 44 persons with CRPS were analyzed to identify problems with wording and support content validation. Item-total correlations were calculated for proposed subscales, and scores were plotted to consider floor/ceiling effects.

FINDINGS

Interviews identified questions where respondents considered factors unrelated to the construct of interest or were underaddressed by the questionnaire, including depression and skin temperature. The symptoms, daily function, and coping/social impact scales demonstrated satisfactory correlations (Cronbach's alpha 0.76-0.86). Despite a sampling bias of severity, no frank floor/ceiling effects were noted.

IMPLICATIONS

This study builds a foundation for continuing development and evaluation of the measurement properties of the Patient-Reported Hamilton Inventory for CRPS. It makes explicit the iterative decisions involved in rigorous instrument development.

摘要

背景

复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)是一种令人困惑的神经系统疾病,患有CRPS的人在日常角色和活动中会遭受重大损失。目前正在开发一种针对特定疾病的测量方法来评估CRPS。

目的

我们描述了使用认知访谈来检验这种针对CRPS的患者报告结局测量方法的内容效度。

方法

对44名CRPS患者进行访谈,分析以识别措辞问题并支持内容效度。计算了拟议子量表的项目-总分相关性,并绘制分数以考虑地板效应/天花板效应。

结果

访谈发现一些问题,受访者在这些问题中考虑了与感兴趣的结构无关的因素或问卷未充分涉及的因素,包括抑郁和皮肤温度。症状、日常功能和应对/社会影响量表显示出令人满意的相关性(克朗巴赫α系数为0.76 - 0.86)。尽管存在严重程度的抽样偏差,但未发现明显的地板效应/天花板效应。

启示

本研究为继续开发和评估CRPS患者报告汉密尔顿量表的测量特性奠定了基础。它明确了严格的量表开发中涉及的迭代决策。

相似文献

1
Content validation of the Patient-Reported Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Validité de contenu du Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, une mesure des résultats déclarés par le patient.患者报告的复杂性区域疼痛综合征汉密尔顿量表的内容效度:复杂性区域疼痛综合征汉密尔顿量表的内容效度,一种患者报告结果的测量方法。
Can J Occup Ther. 2018 Apr;85(2):99-105. doi: 10.1177/0008417417734562. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
2
Measurement Properties of the SF-MPQ-2 Neuropathic Qualities Subscale in Persons with CRPS: Validity, Responsiveness, and Rasch Analysis.复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者 SF-MPQ-2 神经病理性特质分量表的测量特性:效度、反应度和 Rasch 分析。
Pain Med. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):799-809. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny202.
3
Interpretation and content validity of the items of the Hamilton inventory to evaluate outcomes in Persian-speaking patients with complex regional pain syndrome: A cognitive interview approach.评估讲波斯语的复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者结局的汉密尔顿量表项目的解读和内容效度:认知访谈方法。
J Hand Ther. 2023 Oct-Dec;36(4):1007-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
4
Development of a symptoms questionnaire for complex regional pain syndrome and potentially related illnesses: the Trauma Related Neuronal Dysfunction Symptoms Inventory.复杂区域疼痛综合征及潜在相关疾病症状问卷的编制:创伤相关神经元功能障碍症状量表
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jun;89(6):1114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.039.
5
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.
6
Validation of the Japanese version of the Bath CRPS Body Perception Disturbance Scale for CRPS.验证用于复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)的浴 CRPS 身体知觉障碍量表的日文版。
J Anesth. 2021 Feb;35(1):20-26. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02853-0. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
The Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: a cognitive debriefing study of the clinician-based component.汉密尔顿复杂区域疼痛综合征量表:基于临床医生的分量表认知剖析研究。
J Hand Ther. 2012 Jan-Mar;25(1):97-111; quiz 112. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.09.007.
8
Diurnal and nocturnal skin temperature regulation in chronic complex regional pain syndrome.慢性复杂性区域疼痛综合征中的昼夜皮肤温度调节
J Pain. 2015 Mar;16(3):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
9
Novel Signs and Their Clinical Utility in Diagnosing Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.新型体征及其在诊断复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)中的临床应用:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
Clin J Pain. 2017 Jun;33(6):496-502. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000434.
10
A prospective, multisite, international validation of the Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Severity Score.前瞻性、多中心、国际复杂区域疼痛综合征严重程度评分验证。
Pain. 2017 Aug;158(8):1430-1436. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000927.

引用本文的文献

1
ICF Linking and Cognitive Interviewing Are Complementary Methods for Optimizing Content Validity of Outcome Measures: An Integrated Methods Review.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》关联与认知访谈是优化结局指标内容效度的互补方法:综合方法综述
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Oct 14;2:702596. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.702596. eCollection 2021.
2
Patient satisfaction with virtual evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of CRPS.患者对复杂性区域疼痛综合征的虚拟评估、诊断和治疗的满意度。
Can J Pain. 2022 Jun 3;6(1):77-84. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2063113. eCollection 2022.
3
Content validation of the Kamath and Stothard questionnaire for carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis: a cognitive interviewing study.
用于腕管综合征诊断的卡马斯和斯托瑟德问卷的内容效度:一项认知访谈研究
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Nov 7;18(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01614-7.
4
A comparison of the polytomous Rasch analysis output of RUMM2030 and R (ltm/eRm/TAM/lordif).RUMM2030 和 R(ltm/eRm/TAM/lordif)的多项 Rasch 分析结果比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Feb 20;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0680-5.