Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Aug;50(8):833-838. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.01.138. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
For esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with submucosal (SM) invasion, surgery is the standard treatment. Definitive chemoradiotherapy (D-CRT) is a less invasive alternative option, but sometimes results in locoregional failure.
To examine whether endoscopic resection for primary lesion removal combined with chemoradiotherapy (ER-CRT) reduces locoregional failure rates in cases of ESCC with SM invasion.
We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes between ER-CRT and D-CRT in patients diagnosed with ESCC with SM invasion between 2003 and 2014. Twenty-one patients underwent ER-CRT based on a pathological diagnosis, and 43 patients underwent D-CRT based on a clinical diagnosis.
Locoregional failure developed in 26% of patients in the D-CRT group, and in no patients in the ER-CRT group (p < 0.01). Thus, the 5-year relapse-free survival in the ER-CRT group was significantly more favorable than that in the D-CRT group (85.1% vs 59.2%; p < 0.05), although there was no difference in overall survival (85.1% vs 79.1%) nor in cause-specific survival (90.5% vs 87.2%) between the groups. There were no instances of perforation or hemorrhage associated with ER.
ER-CRT is a safe and effective treatment strategy and can be considered as a new minimally invasive treatment option for patients with ESCC with SM invasion.
对于黏膜下(SM)浸润的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC),手术是标准治疗方法。根治性放化疗(D-CRT)是一种侵袭性较小的替代选择,但有时会导致局部区域失败。
研究内镜下切除原发灶联合放化疗(ER-CRT)是否能降低 SM 浸润的 ESCC 患者的局部区域失败率。
我们回顾性比较了 2003 年至 2014 年间被诊断为 SM 浸润性 ESCC 的患者接受 ER-CRT 和 D-CRT 的临床结果。21 例患者根据病理诊断行 ER-CRT,43 例患者根据临床诊断行 D-CRT。
D-CRT 组患者中有 26%发生局部区域失败,而 ER-CRT 组无患者发生(p<0.01)。因此,ER-CRT 组的 5 年无复发生存率明显优于 D-CRT 组(85.1%比 59.2%;p<0.05),尽管两组的总生存率(85.1%比 79.1%)和原因特异性生存率(90.5%比 87.2%)无差异。ER 无穿孔或出血。
ER-CRT 是一种安全有效的治疗策略,可作为 SM 浸润性 ESCC 患者的一种新的微创治疗选择。