Wada Yuki, Kumagai Satoshi, Takagi Noriko, Shinozaki Tetsugaku, Murata Toshiki, Sugawara Daichi, Watanabe Kenta, Matsuhashi Tamotsu, Iijima Katsunori, Mori Naoko
Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan;60(1):32-42. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02156-1. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Prophylactic chemoradiation therapy (CRT) using 40-41.4 Gy post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for clinical T1N0M0 esophageal cancer reportedly yields favorable outcomes. However, it cannot completely prevent locoregional lymph node (LN) metastases. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes and adverse events associated with our dose-escalated treatment regimen (definitive-dose radiotherapy [RT] of 50-61.2 Gy, with/without chemotherapy) for these patients, and predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Between 2006 and 2018, 44 consecutive patients (42 men and 2 women; median age, 70 years) who underwent definitive-dose RT post-ESD and had a pathological depth of the muscularis mucosa with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or the upper-middle submucosal third at our institution were included. We excluded patients who could not obtain a margin-free resection by ESD. If feasible, systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus high- or low-dose cisplatin or nedaplatin was administered concurrently.
Five-year PFS, OS, and disease-specific survival rates were 78.8%, 88.4%, and 97.7%, respectively. Six metachronous esophagus (14%), two locoregional LN within the irradiated area with a prophylactic dose of 41.4 Gy (5%), and two locoregional LN plus liver (5%) recurrences occurred. No LN recurrence occurred within the definitive dose of ≥ 50 Gy in the irradiated area. Metachronous esophageal recurrence involved areas receiving ≥ 50 Gy. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that age was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS.
Definitive-dose RT/CRT post-ESD could provide favorable locoregional LN control and PFS/OS regardless of patient characteristics, including pathological findings and chemotherapy regimen/course, except for age. These results need to be interpreted carefully given several limitations, therefore, definitive-dose RT/CRT should be conducted with caution in clinical practice until high-quality prospective clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness and safety.
据报道,对于临床T1N0M0期食管癌,在内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后使用40 - 41.4 Gy的预防性放化疗(CRT)可产生良好的效果。然而,它不能完全预防局部区域淋巴结(LN)转移。我们回顾性分析了这些患者与我们剂量递增治疗方案(50 - 61.2 Gy的根治性放疗[RT],联合或不联合化疗)相关的结局和不良事件,以及无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的预测因素。
2006年至2018年期间,连续纳入44例患者(42例男性和2例女性;中位年龄70岁),这些患者在我院接受了ESD后的根治性放疗,病理深度为黏膜肌层伴脉管侵犯(LVI)或黏膜下层上中三分之一。我们排除了无法通过ESD获得切缘阴性切除的患者。如果可行,同时给予5 - 氟尿嘧啶联合高剂量或低剂量顺铂或奈达铂的全身化疗。
5年PFS、OS和疾病特异性生存率分别为78.8%、88.4%和97.7%。发生了6例异时性食管癌复发(14%)、2例在预防性剂量为41.4 Gy的照射区域内的局部区域LN复发(5%)以及2例局部区域LN加肝转移复发(5%)。在照射区域内,≥50 Gy的根治性剂量范围内未发生LN复发。异时性食管癌复发累及接受≥50 Gy照射的区域。单因素和多因素分析显示,年龄是PFS和OS的独立预后因素。
ESD后根治性剂量RT/CRT可提供良好的局部区域LN控制和PFS/OS,无论患者特征如何,包括病理结果和化疗方案/疗程,但年龄除外。鉴于存在一些局限性,这些结果需要谨慎解读,因此,在高质量前瞻性临床试验评估其有效性和安全性之前,临床实践中应谨慎进行根治性剂量RT/CRT。