Suppr超能文献

了解预期的内容以及何时会出现这些内容涉及到可分离的神经系统。

Learning what to expect and when to expect it involves dissociable neural systems.

作者信息

Delamater Andrew R, Chen Brandon, Nasser Helen, Elayouby Karim

机构信息

Brooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, United States.

Brooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, United States.

出版信息

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Sep;153(Pt B):144-152. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

Abstract

Two experiments with Long-Evans rats examined the potential independence of learning about different features of food reward, namely, "what" reward is to be expected and "when" it will occur. This was examined by investigating the effects of selective reward devaluation upon responding in an instrumental peak timing task in Experiment 1 and by exploring the effects of pre-training lesions targeting the basolateral amygdala (BLA) upon the selective reward devaluation effect and interval timing in a Pavlovian peak timing task in Experiment 2. In both tasks, two stimuli, each 60 s long, signaled that qualitatively distinct rewards (different flavored food pellets) could occur after 20 s. Responding on non-rewarded probe trials displayed the characteristic peak timing function with mean responding gradually increasing and peaking at approximately 20 s before more gradually declining thereafter. One of the rewards was then independently paired repeatedly with LiCl injections in order to devalue it whereas the other reward was unpaired with these injections. In a final set of test sessions in which both stimuli were presented without rewards, it was observed that responding was selectively reduced in the presence of the stimulus signaling the devalued reward compared to the stimulus signaling the still valued reward. Moreover, the timing function was mostly unaltered by this devaluation manipulation. Experiment 2 showed that pre-training BLA lesions abolished this selective reward devaluation effect, but it had no impact on peak timing functions shown by the two stimuli. It appears from these data that learning about "what" and "when" features of reward may entail separate underlying neural systems.

摘要

两项以长 Evans 大鼠进行的实验,研究了学习食物奖励不同特征的潜在独立性,即预期“何种”奖励以及奖励“何时”出现。在实验 1 中,通过研究选择性奖励贬值对工具性峰值定时任务中反应的影响来进行考察;在实验 2 中,通过探索针对基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)的训练前损伤对巴甫洛夫峰值定时任务中的选择性奖励贬值效应和间隔定时的影响来进行考察。在这两项任务中,两个时长均为 60 秒的刺激信号表明,在 20 秒后可能会出现性质不同的奖励(不同口味的食物颗粒)。在无奖励的探测试验中的反应呈现出特征性的峰值定时函数,平均反应逐渐增加,并在大约 20 秒时达到峰值,此后逐渐下降。然后,其中一种奖励被独立地反复与氯化锂注射配对,以使其贬值,而另一种奖励则不与这些注射配对。在最后一组测试环节中,两个刺激都在无奖励的情况下呈现,结果观察到,与信号仍有价值奖励的刺激相比,在信号贬值奖励的刺激出现时,反应被选择性地降低。此外,这种贬值操作对定时函数的影响大多不明显。实验 2 表明,训练前的 BLA 损伤消除了这种选择性奖励贬值效应,但对两个刺激所显示的峰值定时函数没有影响。从这些数据来看,关于奖励“何种”和“何时”特征的学习可能涉及不同的潜在神经系统。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Interval timing, temporal averaging, and cue integration.间隔计时、时间平均和线索整合。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Apr;8:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.004.
3
Time to rethink the neural mechanisms of learning and memory.是时候重新思考学习和记忆的神经机制了。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Feb;108:136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
4
Associative and temporal processes: a dual process approach.联想与时间进程:一种双进程方法。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
6
Interactions of timing and prediction error learning.时间与预测误差学习的相互作用。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
9
Motivation and timing: clues for modeling the reward system.动机与时机:奖励系统建模的线索
Behav Processes. 2012 May;90(1):142-53. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验