• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解预期的内容以及何时会出现这些内容涉及到可分离的神经系统。

Learning what to expect and when to expect it involves dissociable neural systems.

作者信息

Delamater Andrew R, Chen Brandon, Nasser Helen, Elayouby Karim

机构信息

Brooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, United States.

Brooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, United States.

出版信息

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Sep;153(Pt B):144-152. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.nlm.2018.02.026
PMID:29477609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6087496/
Abstract

Two experiments with Long-Evans rats examined the potential independence of learning about different features of food reward, namely, "what" reward is to be expected and "when" it will occur. This was examined by investigating the effects of selective reward devaluation upon responding in an instrumental peak timing task in Experiment 1 and by exploring the effects of pre-training lesions targeting the basolateral amygdala (BLA) upon the selective reward devaluation effect and interval timing in a Pavlovian peak timing task in Experiment 2. In both tasks, two stimuli, each 60 s long, signaled that qualitatively distinct rewards (different flavored food pellets) could occur after 20 s. Responding on non-rewarded probe trials displayed the characteristic peak timing function with mean responding gradually increasing and peaking at approximately 20 s before more gradually declining thereafter. One of the rewards was then independently paired repeatedly with LiCl injections in order to devalue it whereas the other reward was unpaired with these injections. In a final set of test sessions in which both stimuli were presented without rewards, it was observed that responding was selectively reduced in the presence of the stimulus signaling the devalued reward compared to the stimulus signaling the still valued reward. Moreover, the timing function was mostly unaltered by this devaluation manipulation. Experiment 2 showed that pre-training BLA lesions abolished this selective reward devaluation effect, but it had no impact on peak timing functions shown by the two stimuli. It appears from these data that learning about "what" and "when" features of reward may entail separate underlying neural systems.

摘要

两项以长 Evans 大鼠进行的实验,研究了学习食物奖励不同特征的潜在独立性,即预期“何种”奖励以及奖励“何时”出现。在实验 1 中,通过研究选择性奖励贬值对工具性峰值定时任务中反应的影响来进行考察;在实验 2 中,通过探索针对基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)的训练前损伤对巴甫洛夫峰值定时任务中的选择性奖励贬值效应和间隔定时的影响来进行考察。在这两项任务中,两个时长均为 60 秒的刺激信号表明,在 20 秒后可能会出现性质不同的奖励(不同口味的食物颗粒)。在无奖励的探测试验中的反应呈现出特征性的峰值定时函数,平均反应逐渐增加,并在大约 20 秒时达到峰值,此后逐渐下降。然后,其中一种奖励被独立地反复与氯化锂注射配对,以使其贬值,而另一种奖励则不与这些注射配对。在最后一组测试环节中,两个刺激都在无奖励的情况下呈现,结果观察到,与信号仍有价值奖励的刺激相比,在信号贬值奖励的刺激出现时,反应被选择性地降低。此外,这种贬值操作对定时函数的影响大多不明显。实验 2 表明,训练前的 BLA 损伤消除了这种选择性奖励贬值效应,但对两个刺激所显示的峰值定时函数没有影响。从这些数据来看,关于奖励“何种”和“何时”特征的学习可能涉及不同的潜在神经系统。

相似文献

1
Learning what to expect and when to expect it involves dissociable neural systems.了解预期的内容以及何时会出现这些内容涉及到可分离的神经系统。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Sep;153(Pt B):144-152. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
2
Double dissociation of basolateral and central amygdala lesions on the general and outcome-specific forms of pavlovian-instrumental transfer.基底外侧杏仁核与中央杏仁核损伤在巴甫洛夫式工具性转移的一般形式和结果特异性形式上的双重分离。
J Neurosci. 2005 Jan 26;25(4):962-70. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4507-04.2005.
3
The basolateral amygdala is critical to the expression of pavlovian and instrumental outcome-specific reinforcer devaluation effects.基底外侧杏仁核对于巴甫洛夫式和工具性结果特异性强化物贬值效应的表达至关重要。
J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 21;29(3):696-704. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3758-08.2009.
4
Transient inactivation of basolateral amygdala during selective satiation disrupts reinforcer devaluation in rats.在选择性饱腹感期间基底外侧杏仁核的短暂失活会破坏大鼠的强化物贬值。
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Aug;126(4):563-74. doi: 10.1037/a0029080.
5
Goal-directed responding is sensitive to lesions to the prelimbic cortex or basolateral nucleus of the amygdala but not to their disconnection.目标导向反应对前额叶皮质或杏仁核基底外侧核的损伤敏感,但对它们的切断不敏感。
Behav Neurosci. 2009 Apr;123(2):443-8. doi: 10.1037/a0014818.
6
The role of different subregions of the basolateral amygdala in cue-induced reinstatement and extinction of food-seeking behavior.基底外侧杏仁核不同亚区在线索诱导的食物寻求行为恢复及消退中的作用。
Neuroscience. 2007 Jun 8;146(4):1484-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.03.025. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
7
Functional disconnection of the orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala impairs acquisition of a rat gambling task and disrupts animals' ability to alter decision-making behavior after reinforcer devaluation.眶额皮层和基底外侧杏仁核的功能分离会损害大鼠赌博任务的获得,并破坏动物在强化物贬值后改变决策行为的能力。
J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 10;33(15):6434-43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3971-12.2013.
8
Basolateral Amygdala to Orbitofrontal Cortex Projections Enable Cue-Triggered Reward Expectations.基底外侧杏仁核到眶额叶皮质的投射促成线索触发的奖励预期。
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 30;37(35):8374-8384. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0486-17.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
9
Basolateral amygdala lesions impair both cue- and cocaine-induced reinstatement in animals trained on a discriminative stimulus task.在接受辨别性刺激任务训练的动物中,基底外侧杏仁核损伤会损害线索诱导和可卡因诱导的复吸。
Neuroscience. 2003;121(3):747-57. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00531-1.
10
The effect of lesions of the basolateral amygdala on instrumental conditioning.基底外侧杏仁核损伤对工具性条件反射的影响。
J Neurosci. 2003 Jan 15;23(2):666-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-02-00666.2003.

引用本文的文献

1
Surfacing of Latent Time Memories Supports the Representational Basis of Timing Behavior in Mice.潜在时间记忆的浮现支持了小鼠时间行为的表现基础。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Aug 29;27(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01889-z.
2
Striatal dopamine D1 receptors control motivation to respond, but not interval timing, during the timing task.纹状体多巴胺 D1 受体控制动机反应,但在计时任务期间不控制时间间隔。
Learn Mem. 2020 Dec 15;28(1):24-29. doi: 10.1101/lm.052266.120. Print 2021 Jan.
3
Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.

本文引用的文献

1
Interval timing, temporal averaging, and cue integration.间隔计时、时间平均和线索整合。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Apr;8:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.004.
2
Oscillatory multiplexing of neural population codes for interval timing and working memory.神经群体代码的振荡复用用于间隔计时和工作记忆。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Jan;48:160-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
3
Time to rethink the neural mechanisms of learning and memory.是时候重新思考学习和记忆的神经机制了。
巴甫洛夫条件反射中强化延迟与强化速率的比较
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):203-221. doi: 10.1037/xan0000199. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
4
Sign-tracking is an expectancy-mediated behavior that relies on prediction error mechanisms.标记追踪是一种依赖于预测误差机制的期望介导行为。
Learn Mem. 2018 Sep 17;25(10):550-563. doi: 10.1101/lm.047365.118. Print 2018 Oct.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Feb;108:136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
4
Associative and temporal processes: a dual process approach.联想与时间进程:一种双进程方法。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
5
The amygdala: a potential player in timing CS-US intervals.杏仁核:在条件刺激-非条件刺激间隔计时中可能发挥作用的因素。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:112-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
6
Interactions of timing and prediction error learning.时间与预测误差学习的相互作用。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
7
Time-scale invariance as an emergent property in a perceptron with realistic, noisy neurons.时间尺度不变性作为具有现实噪声神经元的感知机中的一种涌现特性。
Behav Processes. 2013 May;95:60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
Detection of a temporal error triggers reconsolidation of amygdala-dependent memories.检测到时间错误会触发杏仁核依赖性记忆的再巩固。
Curr Biol. 2013 Mar 18;23(6):467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.053. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
9
Motivation and timing: clues for modeling the reward system.动机与时机:奖励系统建模的线索
Behav Processes. 2012 May;90(1):142-53. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
10
On the nature of CS and US representations in Pavlovian learning.论巴甫洛夫式学习中条件刺激(CS)和无条件刺激(US)表征的本质。
Learn Behav. 2012 Mar;40(1):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0036-4.