Suppr超能文献

前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段脊髓型颈椎病:矢状面平衡及轴性症状分析

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus discectomy and fusion for the treatment of two-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: analysis of sagittal balance and axial symptoms.

作者信息

Zhang Yijian, Liu Hao, Yang Huilin, Pi Bin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899 Pinghai Street, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1877-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3804-3. Epub 2018 Feb 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative sagittal balance and occurrence of axial symptoms between anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of two-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

A total of 71 consecutive patients who underwent ACCF or ACDF for two-level CSM in our institution from January 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 30 (17 males, 13 females) were subjected to ACCF, and 41 (20 males, 21 females) were treated with ACDF. Perioperative data, radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes, and axial symptom occurrence were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The average follow-up durations were 13.7 ± 3.9 months in the ACCF group and 13.4 ± 3.3 months in the ACDF group. The volume of blood loss was significantly lower in the ACDF group than in the ACCF group, and the operation time of the former was significantly shorter than that of the latter. The postoperative global lordotic angle and T1 slope were significantly larger in the ACCF group than in the ACDF group in each follow-up. The occurrence of postoperative axial symptoms was significantly lower in the ACDF group than in the ACCF group.

CONCLUSION

The volume of blood loss was lower and the operation time was shorter in ACDF than in ACCF for the treatment of two-level CSM. Sagittal balance was better in the ACDF group than in the ACCF group, and this observation may lead to a reduced occurrence of axial symptoms.

摘要

目的

比较前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗双节段脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)后的矢状面平衡及轴性症状的发生情况。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2016年12月在本机构接受ACCF或ACDF治疗双节段CSM的71例连续患者。其中,30例(男17例,女13例)接受ACCF,41例(男20例,女21例)接受ACDF。比较两组的围手术期数据、影像学参数、临床疗效及轴性症状的发生情况。

结果

ACCF组平均随访时间为13.7±3.9个月,ACDF组为13.4±3.3个月。ACDF组失血量明显低于ACCF组,且前者的手术时间明显短于后者。在每次随访中,ACCF组术后整体前凸角和T1斜率均明显大于ACDF组。ACDF组术后轴性症状的发生率明显低于ACCF组。

结论

对于双节段CSM的治疗,ACDF比ACCF失血量更少,手术时间更短。ACDF组矢状面平衡优于ACCF组,这一观察结果可能会减少轴性症状的发生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验