Suppr超能文献

前路颈椎 X 形切除术和融合术与前路颈椎切除术和融合术治疗双节段颈椎病的比较。

Anterior cervical X-shape-corpectomy and fusion vs. anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for two-level cervical spondylosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, #37 Guoxue Alley, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07986-w. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Anterior cervical X-shape-corpectomy and fusion (ACXF) is a novel cervical surgery, designed as partial alternative to the classic technique, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the early-stage outcomes of ACXF in treating two-level cervical spondylosis (CS) through comparisons with ACCF.

METHODS

A retrospectively comparative study was conducted in two cohorts of patients who underwent single-vertebral ACXF or ACCF to treat two-level CS during September 2019 and October 2021. Clinical and radiological data of all the patients were collected from pre-operation to 1 year after the surgery, following by intra- and intergroup analyses and comparisons.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included, with 24 undergoing ACXF and 33 undergoing ACCF. ACXF group had significantly shorter drainage duration (2.13 ± 0.61 days vs. 3.48 ± 1.30 days, P < 0.001) and less drainage volume (30.21 ± 26.88 ml vs. 69.30 ± 37.65 ml, P < 0.001) than ACCF group. Both techniques significantly improved all the clinical parameters (P < 0.01) with comparable effects (P > 0.05). Each complication rate in ACXF group was lower than that in ACCF group without significant difference (P > 0.05). ACXF showed a significantly smaller transverse decompression range than ACCF (11.93 ± 1.27 mm vs. 16.29 ± 1.88 mm, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, ACXF yielded a comparable fusion rate (P > 0.05) and a significantly lower subsidence rate (P < 0.01) than ACCF technique at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

ACXF is a potential surgical alternative for certain patients with two-level CS, as it provides both adequate decompression range and fewer adverse events than ACCF. The further modifications on ACXF worth exploration.

摘要

目的

前路颈椎 X 形切除术和融合术(ACXF)是一种新的颈椎手术,旨在作为经典前路颈椎切除术和融合术(ACCF)的部分替代方法。本研究旨在通过与 ACCF 比较,评估 ACXF 治疗两节段颈椎病(CS)的早期结果。

方法

对 2019 年 9 月至 2021 年 10 月期间接受单椎体 ACXF 或 ACCF 治疗两节段 CS 的两组患者进行回顾性比较研究。所有患者均在术前至术后 1 年收集临床和影像学资料,然后进行组内和组间分析和比较。

结果

共纳入 57 例患者,其中 24 例行 ACXF,33 例行 ACCF。ACXF 组引流时间(2.13±0.61 天 vs. 3.48±1.30 天,P<0.001)和引流量(30.21±26.88ml vs. 69.30±37.65ml,P<0.001)明显短于 ACCF 组。两种手术均明显改善所有临床参数(P<0.01),且效果相当(P>0.05)。ACXF 组各并发症发生率低于 ACCF 组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ACXF 组的横断减压范围明显小于 ACCF 组(11.93±1.27mm vs. 16.29±1.88mm,P<0.001)。术后,ACXF 在所有时间点的融合率均相当(P>0.05),而沉降率明显低于 ACCF 组(P<0.01)。

结论

ACXF 是治疗两节段 CS 患者的一种潜在手术选择,因为它提供了足够的减压范围和比 ACCF 更少的不良事件。进一步改进 ACXF 值得探索。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验