• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前路颈椎 X 形切除术和融合术与前路颈椎切除术和融合术治疗双节段颈椎病的比较。

Anterior cervical X-shape-corpectomy and fusion vs. anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for two-level cervical spondylosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, #37 Guoxue Alley, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07986-w. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-07986-w
PMID:37902849
Abstract

PURPOSE

Anterior cervical X-shape-corpectomy and fusion (ACXF) is a novel cervical surgery, designed as partial alternative to the classic technique, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the early-stage outcomes of ACXF in treating two-level cervical spondylosis (CS) through comparisons with ACCF.

METHODS

A retrospectively comparative study was conducted in two cohorts of patients who underwent single-vertebral ACXF or ACCF to treat two-level CS during September 2019 and October 2021. Clinical and radiological data of all the patients were collected from pre-operation to 1 year after the surgery, following by intra- and intergroup analyses and comparisons.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included, with 24 undergoing ACXF and 33 undergoing ACCF. ACXF group had significantly shorter drainage duration (2.13 ± 0.61 days vs. 3.48 ± 1.30 days, P < 0.001) and less drainage volume (30.21 ± 26.88 ml vs. 69.30 ± 37.65 ml, P < 0.001) than ACCF group. Both techniques significantly improved all the clinical parameters (P < 0.01) with comparable effects (P > 0.05). Each complication rate in ACXF group was lower than that in ACCF group without significant difference (P > 0.05). ACXF showed a significantly smaller transverse decompression range than ACCF (11.93 ± 1.27 mm vs. 16.29 ± 1.88 mm, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, ACXF yielded a comparable fusion rate (P > 0.05) and a significantly lower subsidence rate (P < 0.01) than ACCF technique at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

ACXF is a potential surgical alternative for certain patients with two-level CS, as it provides both adequate decompression range and fewer adverse events than ACCF. The further modifications on ACXF worth exploration.

摘要

目的

前路颈椎 X 形切除术和融合术(ACXF)是一种新的颈椎手术,旨在作为经典前路颈椎切除术和融合术(ACCF)的部分替代方法。本研究旨在通过与 ACCF 比较,评估 ACXF 治疗两节段颈椎病(CS)的早期结果。

方法

对 2019 年 9 月至 2021 年 10 月期间接受单椎体 ACXF 或 ACCF 治疗两节段 CS 的两组患者进行回顾性比较研究。所有患者均在术前至术后 1 年收集临床和影像学资料,然后进行组内和组间分析和比较。

结果

共纳入 57 例患者,其中 24 例行 ACXF,33 例行 ACCF。ACXF 组引流时间(2.13±0.61 天 vs. 3.48±1.30 天,P<0.001)和引流量(30.21±26.88ml vs. 69.30±37.65ml,P<0.001)明显短于 ACCF 组。两种手术均明显改善所有临床参数(P<0.01),且效果相当(P>0.05)。ACXF 组各并发症发生率低于 ACCF 组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ACXF 组的横断减压范围明显小于 ACCF 组(11.93±1.27mm vs. 16.29±1.88mm,P<0.001)。术后,ACXF 在所有时间点的融合率均相当(P>0.05),而沉降率明显低于 ACCF 组(P<0.01)。

结论

ACXF 是治疗两节段 CS 患者的一种潜在手术选择,因为它提供了足够的减压范围和比 ACCF 更少的不良事件。进一步改进 ACXF 值得探索。

相似文献

1
Anterior cervical X-shape-corpectomy and fusion vs. anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for two-level cervical spondylosis.前路颈椎 X 形切除术和融合术与前路颈椎切除术和融合术治疗双节段颈椎病的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07986-w. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.颈椎脊髓病的两级椎体次全切除术与三级椎间盘切除术:围手术期、影像学及临床结果比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):280-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14545. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
3
A Novel Anterior Cervical X-Shape-Corpectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spinal Stenosis at C4-C6 Level: A Technical Note.一种新型的颈椎前路 X 形椎体次全切除融合术治疗 C4-C6 水平的颈椎狭窄症:技术说明。
World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated and radiographic outcome after 2 types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.两种减压融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的患者自评和影像学疗效比较研究:前路颈椎间盘切除与椎体次全切除。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.FOCUS1396.
5
Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.两种手术方式(两节段椎间盘切除术或单节段椎体次全切除术)治疗颈椎间盘疾病后颈椎融合的比较:矢状位曲度、颈椎前凸度、移植物塌陷及临近节段骨化。
Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
6
Clinical and radiological results of two hybrid reconstructive techniques in noncontiguous 3-level cervical spondylosis.两种混合重建技术治疗非连续性三节段颈椎病的临床及影像学结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):944-50. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE13791. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
7
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus discectomy and fusion for the treatment of two-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: analysis of sagittal balance and axial symptoms.前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段脊髓型颈椎病:矢状面平衡及轴性症状分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1877-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3804-3. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
8
Comparison of Three Anterior Techniques in the Surgical Treatment of Three-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Intramedullary T2-Weighted Increased Signal Intensity.对比三种前路技术在伴有脊髓内 T2 加权高信号的三平面颈椎脊髓病中的应用。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e842-e852. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.182. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
9
Evaluation of anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cages after 1- or 2-level corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study of 117 patients.钛网融合器与纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66融合器用于多节段脊髓型颈椎病单节段或双节段椎体次全切除术后前路颈椎重建的疗效评估:117例患者的回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2014 May 2;9(5):e96265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096265. eCollection 2014.
10
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylosis: a systematic review.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术治疗多节段颈椎病的系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Feb;132(2):155-61. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1402-6. Epub 2011 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Lower C2 slope and milder uncovertebral joint degeneration are risk factors for pseudarthrosis after single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF): retrospective study of 102 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up.下颈椎C2椎体倾斜度及较轻的钩椎关节退变是单节段颈椎前路椎体切除融合术(ACCF)后假关节形成的危险因素:对102例患者进行至少2年随访的回顾性研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Mar 4;20(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05629-y.
2
Anterior cervical trapezoid corpectomy and fusion (ACTCF): a novel technique for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.前路颈椎梯形椎体次全切除融合术(ACTCF):一种治疗脊髓型颈椎病的新技术。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Feb 14;48(1):233. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03407-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Case Presentation With Surgical Technique Demonstration and Review of Literature.颈椎前路椎体切除术和融合术治疗退行性颈椎病性脊髓病:病例报告及手术技术演示,并复习文献。
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 Dec 1;35(10):440-446. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001410. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
2
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Research.临床研究中的患者报告结局指标
JAMA. 2022 Aug 2;328(5):472-473. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.11238.
3
Stand-Alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating for 1-Level and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
单节段和双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:独立椎间融合器与前路钢板固定的随机对照试验
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 May 1;35(4):155-165. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001332. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
A Novel Anterior Cervical X-Shape-Corpectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spinal Stenosis at C4-C6 Level: A Technical Note.一种新型的颈椎前路 X 形椎体次全切除融合术治疗 C4-C6 水平的颈椎狭窄症:技术说明。
World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
5
Risk factors for subsidence of titanium mesh cage following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.颈椎前路单节段切除融合术后钛网 cage 下沉的危险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 14;21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3036-8.
6
Radiographic measurements of cervical alignment, fusion and subsidence after ACDF surgery and their impact on clinical outcome.颈椎前路融合术后颈椎曲度、融合和下沉的影像学测量及其对临床结果的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jan;162(1):89-99. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04139-1. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
7
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus discectomy and fusion for the treatment of two-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: analysis of sagittal balance and axial symptoms.前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段脊髓型颈椎病:矢状面平衡及轴性症状分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1877-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3804-3. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
8
Anterior Cervical Option to Manage Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.治疗退行性颈椎脊髓病的前路颈椎手术方案
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018 Jan;29(1):83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.005.
9
The new Zero-P implant can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative dysphagia and complications compared with the traditional anterior cage and plate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与传统前路椎间融合器和钢板相比,新型Zero-P椎间融合器可有效降低术后吞咽困难及并发症的风险:一项系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Oct 18;17(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1274-6.
10
Graft Subsidence and Revision Rates Following Anterior Cervical Corpectomy: A Clinical Study Comparing Different Interbody Cages.颈椎前路椎体次全切除术后的植骨沉降及翻修率:一项比较不同椎间融合器的临床研究
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):E1239-E1245. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000428.