• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单片剂抗HIV治疗方案有助于初治患者实现病毒学抑制并坚持治疗。

Single tablet HIV regimens facilitate virologic suppression and retention in care among treatment naïve patients.

作者信息

Hemmige Vagish, Flash Charlene A, Carter Josephinel, Giordano Thomas P, Zerai Teddy

机构信息

a Division of Infectious Diseases , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston , TX , USA.

b Harris Health System , Houston , TX , USA.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 2018 Aug;30(8):1017-1024. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1442554. Epub 2018 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1080/09540121.2018.1442554
PMID:29478329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6094383/
Abstract

Newer HIV regimens are typically taken once daily but vary in the number of pills required. Whether the number of pills in a once-daily HIV regimen affects clinical outcomes is unknown. We retrospectively compared adherence, retention in care, and virologic outcomes between patients starting a once daily single-tablet regimen (STR) to patients starting a once-daily multi-tablet regimen (MTR) in a publicly funded clinic in the United States. Outcomes were measured in the year after starting ART and included retention in care, virologic suppression, and medication possession ratio of at least 80%. Data from patients initiating therapy from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2011 were analyzed with both unadjusted and propensity-score adjusted regression. Overall, 622 patients started with an STR (100% efavirenz-based) and 406 with an MTR (65% atazanavir-based and 35% darunavir-based) regimen. Retention in care was achieved in 80.7% of STR patients vs. 72.7% of MTR patients (unadjusted OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.17-2.11; adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-2.02). Virologic suppression occurred among 84.4% of STR patients vs. 77.6% of MTR patients (unadjusted OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.14-2.15; adjusted OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.02-1.96). There was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving at least 80% adherence, as measured by medication possession ratio (33.0% of STR patients and 30.1% of MTR patients; unadjusted OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.87-1.50; adjusted OR 1.04, CI 0.79-1.38). While it is difficult to eliminate confounding in this observational study, retention in care and virologic outcomes were better in patients prescribed STRs.

摘要

较新的抗HIV治疗方案通常每天服用一次,但所需药片数量各不相同。每日一次的抗HIV治疗方案中的药片数量是否会影响临床结果尚不清楚。我们在美国一家公共资助诊所中,对开始每日一次单片治疗方案(STR)的患者与开始每日一次多片治疗方案(MTR)的患者的依从性、持续治疗率和病毒学结果进行了回顾性比较。在开始抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)后的一年中对结果进行测量,包括持续治疗率、病毒学抑制以及药物持有率至少达到80%。对2008年1月1日至2011年12月31日开始治疗的患者数据进行了未调整和倾向得分调整回归分析。总体而言,622例患者开始使用STR方案(100%基于依非韦伦),406例患者开始使用MTR方案(65%基于阿扎那韦,35%基于达芦那韦)。STR组患者的持续治疗率为80.7%,而MTR组患者为72.7%(未调整比值比1.57,95%置信区间1.17 - 2.11;调整后比值比1.49,95%置信区间1.10 - 2.02)。STR组患者中84.4%实现了病毒学抑制,而MTR组患者为77.6%(未调整比值比1.56;95%置信区间1.14 - 2.15;调整后比值比1.41;95%置信区间1.02 - 1.96)。通过药物持有率衡量,达到至少80%依从性的患者比例没有差异(STR组患者为33.0%,MTR组患者为30.1%;未调整比值比1.14;95%置信区间0.87 - 1.50;调整后比值比1.04,置信区间0.79 - 1.38)。虽然在这项观察性研究中难以消除混杂因素,但接受STR方案治疗的患者在持续治疗率和病毒学结果方面更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadf/6094383/24c085ae51ec/nihms967508f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadf/6094383/24c085ae51ec/nihms967508f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadf/6094383/24c085ae51ec/nihms967508f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Single tablet HIV regimens facilitate virologic suppression and retention in care among treatment naïve patients.单片剂抗HIV治疗方案有助于初治患者实现病毒学抑制并坚持治疗。
AIDS Care. 2018 Aug;30(8):1017-1024. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1442554. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
2
Impact of Pill Burden on Adherence, Risk of Hospitalization, and Viral Suppression in Patients with HIV Infection and AIDS Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy.药丸负担对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的艾滋病毒感染和艾滋病患者的依从性、住院风险及病毒抑制的影响
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Apr;36(4):385-401. doi: 10.1002/phar.1728. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
Odds of Viral Suppression by Single-Tablet Regimens, Multiple-Tablet Regimens, and Adherence Level in HIV/AIDS Patients Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy.接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV/AIDS患者中,单片剂方案、多片剂方案及依从性水平实现病毒抑制的几率。
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Feb;37(2):204-213. doi: 10.1002/phar.1889. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
4
Comparison of adherence to generic multi-tablet regimens vs. brand multi-tablet and brand single-tablet regimens likely to incorporate generic antiretroviral drugs by breaking or not fixed-dose combinations in HIV-infected patients.比较艾滋病毒感染患者中,通过拆分或不拆分固定剂量组合,服用通用多片方案与可能包含通用抗逆转录病毒药物的品牌多片方案及品牌单片方案的依从性。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;32(4):450-458. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12363. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
5
Real-world adherence and persistence for newly-prescribed HIV treatment: single versus multiple tablet regimen comparison among US medicaid beneficiaries.新处方 HIV 治疗的真实世界依从性和持久性:美国医疗补助受益人群中单一片剂与多片剂方案比较。
AIDS Res Ther. 2020 Apr 1;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12981-020-00268-1.
6
Adherence among rural HIV-infected patients in the deep south: a comparison between single-tablet and multi-tablet once-daily regimens.泰国南部农村地区艾滋病毒感染患者的治疗依从性:单片剂与多片剂每日一次治疗方案的比较
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015 Jan-Feb;14(1):64-71. doi: 10.1177/2325957414555228. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
7
Adherence after treatment switch from a multiple tablet antiretroviral regimen to a single tablet antiretroviral regimen.治疗方案转换后(从多药片抗逆转录病毒疗法改为单药片抗逆转录病毒疗法)的坚持情况。
Therapie. 2021 Nov-Dec;76(6):567-576. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.12.017. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Single and Multi-Tablet Fixed Dose Combination HIV Treatment Regimens.比较单片和多片固定剂量组合HIV治疗方案的研究的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1677. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001677.
9
Persistence and adherence to single-tablet regimens in HIV treatment: a cohort study from the French National Healthcare Insurance Database.抗 HIV 治疗中单片剂方案的坚持和依从性:来自法国国家医疗保健保险数据库的队列研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jul;70(7):2121-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv083. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
10
Uptake and virological outcomes of single- versus multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens among treatment-naïve youth in the HIV Research Network.在 HIV 研究网络中,初治青少年接受单一片剂与多片剂抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的摄取和病毒学结果。
HIV Med. 2019 Feb;20(2):169-174. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12695. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A Stable Switch From Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (B/FTC/TAF) to Dolutegravir/Lamivudine (DTG/3TC) in the Absence of Historical Resistance Records: Results From the Switch to Dovato in Patients Suppressed on Biktarvy (SOUND) Cohort.在缺乏既往耐药记录的情况下,从比克替拉韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(B/FTC/TAF)稳定转换为多替拉韦/拉米夫定(DTG/3TC):在Biktarvy治疗下病毒得到抑制的患者中转换为Dovato的队列研究(SOUND)结果
Cureus. 2025 Apr 21;17(4):e82716. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82716. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Risk of HIV Viral Rebound in the Era of Universal Treatment in a Multicenter Sample of Persons With HIV in Primary Care.基层医疗中多中心HIV感染者样本在普遍治疗时代的HIV病毒反弹风险
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 May 10;10(6):ofad257. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad257. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and tolerance of single tablet versus once daily multiple tablet regimens as first-line antiretroviral therapy - Results from a large french multicenter cohort study.单片制剂与每日一次多片制剂作为一线抗逆转录病毒疗法的有效性和耐受性——一项大型法国多中心队列研究的结果
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170661. eCollection 2017.
2
Abacavir + dolutegravir + lamivudine for the treatment of HIV.阿巴卡韦+多替拉韦+拉米夫定用于治疗艾滋病病毒。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;17(15):2097-106. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1232387. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Impact of Pill Burden on Adherence, Risk of Hospitalization, and Viral Suppression in Patients with HIV Infection and AIDS Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy.
Cumulative tenofovir diphosphate exposure in persons with HIV taking single- vs. multiple-tablet regimens.接受单一片剂与多片剂方案的 HIV 感染者中累积替诺福韦二磷酸酯暴露。
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Aug;42(8):641-650. doi: 10.1002/phar.2711. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
Effect of single tablet regimen on prescription trends for treatment-naïve patients with HIV/AIDS in Korea.单片治疗方案对韩国初治 HIV/AIDS 患者处方趋势的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 7;12(1):2031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06005-0.
5
Resource Utilization and Caring Cost of People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV) in Saudi Arabia: A Tertiary Care University Hospital Experience.沙特阿拉伯人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者的资源利用与护理成本:一家三级护理大学医院的经验
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 7;10(1):118. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010118.
6
Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting.HIV 感染者接受单片与多片方案治疗的患者报告结局:来自真实环境的数据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262533. eCollection 2022.
7
Forgiveness of Dolutegravir-Based Triple Therapy Compared With Older Antiretroviral Regimens: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort of Adherence Patterns and HIV-RNA Replication.基于多替拉韦的三联疗法与旧抗逆转录病毒方案相比的疗效:一项关于依从模式和HIV-RNA复制的前瞻性多中心队列研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 1;8(7):ofab316. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab316. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Similar Durability of Two Single Tablet Regimens, Dolutegravir/Abacavir/Lamivudine and Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Tenofovir/Emtricitabine: Single Center Experience.两种单片复方制剂(多替拉韦/阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定和艾维雷韦/考比司他/替诺福韦/恩曲他滨)的相似耐久性:单中心经验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jul 27;35(29):e235. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e235.
9
Skin and Soft Tissue Infection in People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in a Large, Urban, Public Healthcare System in Houston, Texas, 2009-2014.2009-2014 年,德克萨斯州休斯顿市一个大型城市公共医疗系统中,人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者的皮肤和软组织感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;70(9):1985-1992. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz509.
10
Antiretroviral adherence and virologic suppression in partnered and unpartnered HIV-positive individuals in southern Brazil.巴西南部 HIV 阳性的伴侣和非伴侣个体中的抗逆转录病毒药物依从性和病毒学抑制情况。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0212744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212744. eCollection 2019.
药丸负担对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的艾滋病毒感染和艾滋病患者的依从性、住院风险及病毒抑制的影响
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Apr;36(4):385-401. doi: 10.1002/phar.1728. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
Darunavir/cobicistat once daily for the treatment of HIV.达芦那韦/考比司他每日一次用于治疗HIV。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015 Jun;13(6):691-704. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1033400.
5
Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in the First Protease Inhibitor-Based Single-Tablet Regimen for Initial HIV-1 Therapy: A Randomized Phase 2 Study.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺与富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯用于基于首个蛋白酶抑制剂的单片复方初始HIV-1治疗方案:一项随机2期研究。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Aug 1;69(4):439-45. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000618.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of 3 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing antiretroviral regimens for treatment-naive volunteers infected with HIV-1: a randomized, controlled equivalence trial.三种不含非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂的抗逆转录病毒方案用于初治HIV-1感染志愿者的疗效和耐受性:一项随机对照等效性试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Oct 7;161(7):461-71. doi: 10.7326/M14-1084.
7
Single-Tablet Regimens in HIV Therapy.HIV 治疗中的单片制剂方案。
Infect Dis Ther. 2014 Jun;3(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s40121-014-0024-z. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
8
Effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in individuals who for economic reasons were switched from a once-daily single-tablet regimen to a triple-tablet regimen.因经济原因将每日一次单片方案转换为三联片剂方案的个体中抗逆转录病毒治疗的效果。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Aug 1;66(4):407-13. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000199.
9
Lower pill burden and once-daily antiretroviral treatment regimens for HIV infection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.降低HIV感染的药丸负担及每日一次抗逆转录病毒治疗方案:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 May;58(9):1297-307. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu046. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
10
Medication (re)fill adherence measures derived from pharmacy claims data in older Americans: a review of the literature.从美国老年人的药房理赔数据中得出的药物(再)填充依从性措施:文献综述。
Drugs Aging. 2013 Jun;30(6):383-99. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0074-z.