Ignoring theory and evidence: commentary on Kok et al. (2018).
作者信息
Niederdeppe Jeff, Kemp Deena
机构信息
a Department of Communication , Cornell University , Ithaca , NY , USA.
出版信息
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):136-139. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1445543. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Ignoring theory and evidence: commentary on Kok et al. (2018).忽视理论与证据：对科克等人（2018年）的评论
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):136-139. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1445543. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
2
Misinterpreting theory and ignoring evidence: fear appeals can actually work: a comment on Kok et al. (2018).误解理论与忽视证据：恐惧诉求实际上可能有效：对科克等人（2018年）的评论
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):126-128. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1445545. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
3
Investigating belief falsehood. Fear appeals do change behaviour in experimental laboratory studies. A commentary on Kok et al. (2018).探究信念虚假性。恐惧诉求在实验室内研究中确实会改变行为。对科克等人（2018年）的一篇评论。
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):147-150. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1448292. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
A (Re)defining moment for fear appeals: a comment on Kok et al. (2018).恐惧诉求的一个（重新）定义时刻：对科克等人（2018年）的评论。
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):144-146. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1445546. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
5
What constitutes evidence that fear appeals have positive effects on health behaviour? Commentary on Kok, Peters, Kessels, ten Hoor, and Ruiter (2018).什么构成了恐惧诉求对健康行为有积极影响的证据？对科克、彼得斯、凯塞尔斯、滕胡尔和鲁伊特（2018年）的评论。
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):133-135. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1445541. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Fearless dominance and psychopathy: a response to Lilienfeld et al.无畏支配与精神病态：对利里菲尔德等人的回应
Personal Disord. 2012 Jul;3(3):341-53. doi: 10.1037/a0028296.
7
Capsule Commentary on Kok et al., Risk of Autoimmune Disease in Adults with Chronic Insomnia Requiring Sleep-Inducing Pills: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study.对Kok等人的胶囊评论：需要助眠药物的慢性失眠成年患者患自身免疫性疾病的风险：一项基于人群的纵向研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Sep;31(9):1077. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3753-8.
8
Prediction and surprise in human fear conditioning (commentary on Boll et al.).人类恐惧条件反射中的预测与意外（对博尔等人的评论）
Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Mar;37(5):757. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12147.
9
Fear, conditioning, and aging: theoretical comment on LaBar et al. (2004).恐惧、条件作用与衰老：对拉巴尔等人（2004年）的理论评论
Behav Neurosci. 2004 Oct;118(5):1137-9. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.5.1137.
10
Ignoring theory and misinterpreting evidence: the false belief in fear appeals.忽视理论和误解证据：对恐惧诉求的错误信念。
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):111-125. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2017.1415767. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
引用本文的文献
1
How can we better frame COVID-19 public health messages?我们如何能更好地构建关于新冠疫情的公共卫生信息？
Discov Psychol. 2022;2(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s44202-022-00042-6. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
2
The use of fear appeals for pandemic compliance: A systematic review of empirical measurement, fear appeal strategies and effectiveness.利用恐惧诉求促进大流行期间的依从性：对实证测量、恐惧诉求策略及有效性的系统评价
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 25;10(9):e30383. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30383. eCollection 2024 May 15.
3
Change of risk behaviour in young people - the effectiveness of the trauma prevention programme P.A.R.T.Y. considering the effect of fear appeals and cognitive processes.年轻人风险行为的改变——创伤预防计划 P.A.R.T.Y. 的有效性，考虑到恐惧诉求和认知过程的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12918-2.
4
Fear appeals to promote better health behaviors: an investigation of potential mediators.恐惧诉求对促进更健康行为的影响：潜在中介因素的调查
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 Jul 6;9(1):600-618. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.1947290. eCollection 2021.
5
"I Quit": Testing the Added Value and Sequencing Effects of an Efficacy-focused Message among Cigarette Warning Labels.“我戒烟了”：测试以功效为重点的信息在香烟警语标签中的附加价值和先后顺序效应。
J Health Commun. 2020 May 3;25(5):361-373. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1767236. Epub 2020 May 31.
6
Reactions to graphic and text health warnings for cigarettes, sugar-sweetened beverages, and alcohol: An online randomized experiment of US adults.对香烟、含糖饮料和酒精的图形和文字健康警告的反应：一项针对美国成年人的在线随机实验。
Prev Med. 2020 Aug;137:106120. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106120. Epub 2020 May 8.
本文引用的文献
1
Effects of Varying Color, Imagery, and Text of Cigarette Package Warning Labels among Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Middle School Youth and Adult Smokers.社会经济地位不利的中学生和成年吸烟者中不同颜色、意象和文字的香烟包装警示标签的影响。
Health Commun. 2019 Mar;34(3):306-316. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1407228. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
2
Ignoring theory and misinterpreting evidence: the false belief in fear appeals.忽视理论和误解证据：对恐惧诉求的错误信念。
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):111-125. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2017.1415767. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
Effects of 30% and 50% Cigarette Pack Graphic Warning Labels on Visual Attention, Negative Affect, Quit Intentions, and Smoking Susceptibility among Disadvantaged Populations in the United States.30% 和 50% 香烟包装图形警示标签对美国弱势群体的视觉注意力、负面情绪、戒烟意愿和吸烟易感性的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):859-866. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx244.
4
Countering Craving with Disgust Images: Examining Nicotine Withdrawn Smokers' Motivated Message Processing of Anti-Tobacco Public Service Announcements.用厌恶图像对抗渴望：研究尼古丁戒断吸烟者对反烟草公益广告的动机性信息处理
J Health Commun. 2017 Mar;22(3):254-261. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1268222. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
5
The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.强化香烟包装警示的影响：纵向观察性研究的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:118-129. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
Understanding narrative effects: the role of discrete negative emotions on message processing and attitudes among low-income African American women.理解叙事效果：离散负面情绪对低收入非裔美国女性信息处理及态度的作用
Health Commun. 2014;29(5):494-504. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.776001. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
7
Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory.威胁性沟通：恐惧诉求理论的批判性重新分析与修正后的元分析检验
Health Psychol Rev. 2013 May;7(Suppl 1):S8-S31. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2012.703527. Epub 2013 May 28.
8
Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour.利用大众媒体运动改变健康行为。
Lancet. 2010 Oct 9;376(9748):1261-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4.
Zotero 插件