Namazi Nazli, Larijani Bagher, Azadbakht Leila
Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 1;20(11):704-713.
Previous trials have reported beneficial effects of isolated and complex fiber supplements in obesity treatment. However, recommending fiber supplements in obese subjects remains controversial. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review has updated the data on the effects of fiber supplements on obesity since 2010 and the need exists for a systematic review on this topic. Accordingly, a systematic review was undertaken to summarize the efficacy of different types of fiber supplements as a complementary treatment for weight management.
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar between January 2010 to August 2016 with no language restriction. Considering the inclusion/exclusion criteria and quality assessment score, finally 17 clinical trials met the eligibility criteria and were included.
The present study indicated that the efficacy of various fiber supplements on losing weight is variable. Several mechanisms related to physicochemical properties of fibers such as solubility, fermentability and viscosity rates can be involved in their anti-obesity effects. Dextrin, Mannan (gum Arabic) and pectin-rich fiber (lupin kernel) with no dietary interventions indicated a reduction in body weight and energy intake, while from clinical point of view, their effects were not considerable.
Overall, findings indicated that the efficacy of fiber supplements on obesity management is dependent on their contents and physicochemical properties. It seems that fiber supplements with no weight-loss interventions did not have considerable antiobesity effects. However, due to limited studies on each type of fiber, findings should be declared by caution. Additional research is needed on comparison of different fiber supplements in similar conditions to clarify the best type and dosage of fiber supplement as a complementary therapy in obesity management.
既往试验报道了分离纤维补充剂和复合纤维补充剂在肥胖治疗中的有益作用。然而,在肥胖受试者中推荐使用纤维补充剂仍存在争议。据我们所知,自2010年以来尚无系统评价更新纤维补充剂对肥胖影响的数据,因此有必要对该主题进行系统评价。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价,以总结不同类型纤维补充剂作为体重管理辅助治疗的疗效。
我们于2010年1月至2016年8月在PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术上进行检索,无语言限制。根据纳入/排除标准和质量评估评分,最终有17项临床试验符合纳入标准并被纳入。
本研究表明,各种纤维补充剂在减肥方面的疗效各不相同。与纤维的物理化学性质相关的几种机制,如溶解性、发酵性和粘度率,可能参与其抗肥胖作用。在无饮食干预的情况下,糊精、甘露聚糖(阿拉伯胶)和富含果胶的纤维(羽扇豆仁)可降低体重和能量摄入,但从临床角度来看,其效果并不显著。
总体而言,研究结果表明纤维补充剂对肥胖管理的疗效取决于其成分和物理化学性质。似乎在无减肥干预措施的情况下,纤维补充剂没有显著的抗肥胖作用。然而,由于对每种纤维的研究有限,研究结果应谨慎宣布。需要在相似条件下对不同纤维补充剂进行更多研究,以明确作为肥胖管理辅助疗法的最佳纤维补充剂类型和剂量。