Li Yanming, Yang Changwei, Zhu Xiaodong, Li Ming
Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jan;97(2):e9488. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009488.
A retrospective study.The optimal implant density in patients with Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is undefined, and there is no study reporting the correlation between the partitional implant density and the correction outcome.To determine whether the implant density in structural and nonstructural regions would affect the coronal correction outcome of Lenke 1A and 1B AIS.Preoperative general data and postoperative follow-up data of Lenke 1A and 1B AIS patients who received posterior fusion with the pedicle screw system were analyzed. Correlations between the implant density in structural and nonstructural regions and the correction rate of coronal Cobb angle, as well as between the correction rate and loss of the coronal correction angle during a 2-year follow-up period were analyzed. According to the implant density, the patients were classified into 2 groups: structural region group (including A1 and A2), and nonstructural region group (including B1 and B2). Differences in related parameters between the 2 groups were compared statistically.Except for the mean implant density, there was no statistical difference in the other parameters between group A1 and A2. In group B1 and B2, the correction rate of the main thoracic (MT) curve was 63.0% and 71.6% (P = .022), and the loss of the correction angle was 2.1° and 4.2°, respectively (P < .01), showing a statistical difference in the correction rate and postoperative angle loss of the MT curve between group B1 and B2.The correction rate of the MT curve at the coronal plane and postoperative loss of the correction angle were not related to the implant density in structural regions but may be related to the implant density in nonstructural regions in the treatment of Lenke type 1A and 1B AIS with pedicle screw instrumentation.
一项回顾性研究。Lenke 1型青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者的最佳植入物密度尚不明确,且尚无研究报道分区植入物密度与矫正效果之间的相关性。旨在确定结构区和非结构区的植入物密度是否会影响Lenke 1A和1B型AIS的冠状面矫正效果。分析接受椎弓根螺钉系统后路融合的Lenke 1A和1B型AIS患者的术前一般资料和术后随访资料。分析结构区和非结构区的植入物密度与冠状面Cobb角矫正率之间的相关性,以及在2年随访期内矫正率与冠状面矫正角度丢失之间的相关性。根据植入物密度,将患者分为两组:结构区组(包括A1和A2)和非结构区组(包括B1和B2)。对两组相关参数的差异进行统计学比较。除平均植入物密度外,A1组和A2组之间的其他参数无统计学差异。在B1组和B2组中,主胸弯(MT)的矫正率分别为63.0%和71.6%(P = 0.022),矫正角度丢失分别为2.1°和4.2°(P < 0.01),B1组和B2组之间MT弯的矫正率和术后角度丢失存在统计学差异。在采用椎弓根螺钉器械治疗Lenke 1A和1B型AIS时,冠状面MT弯的矫正率和术后矫正角度丢失与结构区的植入物密度无关,但可能与非结构区的植入物密度有关。