Fiorini Giulia, Zullo Angelo, Saracino Ilaria M, Gatta Luigi, Pavoni Matteo, Vaira Dino
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna.
Gastroenterology Unit, 'Nuovo Regina Margherita' Hospital, Rome.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun;30(6):621-625. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001102.
Italian guideline suggests 10-day sequential or bismuth-based quadruple therapies for first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment. Comparison between these regimens is lacking. We assessed the efficacy of these therapies in clinical practice and evaluated the role of primary bacterial resistance toward clarithromycin and metronidazole.
Consecutive patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled. Bacterial culture with antibiotics susceptibility testing was attempted in all cases. Patients received either a sequential therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg for 10 days plus amoxicillin 1000 mg for the first 5 days followed by clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg (all twice daily) for the remaining 5 days, or bismuth-based therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily and Pylera 3 tablets four times daily for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by using C-urea breath test.
A total of 495 patients were enrolled. Following sequential (250 patients) and quadruple (245 patients) therapies, the eradication rate were 92 and 91%, respectively, at intention-to-treat analysis and 96 and 97%, respectively, at per protocol analysis. Overall, the pattern of bacterial resistance did not significantly affect the cure rate, but the presence of clarithromycin and metronidazole dual resistance tended to reduce the success rate of both sequential (84.8 vs. 90.1%; P=0.4) and quadruple (85 vs. 94.1%; P=0.06) therapies. Adverse events occurred more frequently with the quadruple than with sequential therapy (56.9 vs. 25.8%; P<0.001).
In our country, sequential and bismuth-based quadruple therapy achieved similarly high eradication rates as first-line treatments for H. pylori infection in clinical practice.
意大利指南建议采用10天序贯疗法或铋剂四联疗法作为幽门螺杆菌一线治疗方案。目前尚缺乏这两种方案之间的比较。我们评估了这些疗法在临床实践中的疗效,并评估了对克拉霉素和甲硝唑的原发性细菌耐药性的作用。
纳入连续的幽门螺杆菌感染患者。所有病例均尝试进行细菌培养及抗生素敏感性检测。患者接受以下两种治疗之一:序贯疗法,埃索美拉唑40毫克,每日2次,共10天,前5天加用阿莫西林1000毫克,每日2次,后5天加用克拉霉素500毫克和替硝唑500毫克,每日2次;或铋剂四联疗法,埃索美拉唑20毫克,每日2次,Pylera 3片,每日4次,共10天。采用C - 尿素呼气试验评估幽门螺杆菌根除情况。
共纳入495例患者。在意向性分析中,序贯疗法(250例患者)和四联疗法(245例患者)后的根除率分别为92%和91%,符合方案分析中分别为96%和97%。总体而言,细菌耐药模式并未显著影响治愈率,但克拉霉素和甲硝唑双重耐药的存在往往会降低序贯疗法(84.8%对90.1%;P = 0.4)和四联疗法(85%对94.1%;P = 0.06)的成功率。四联疗法的不良事件发生率高于序贯疗法(56.9%对25.8%;P < 0.001)。
在我国,序贯疗法和铋剂四联疗法作为幽门螺杆菌感染的一线治疗方案,在临床实践中均取得了相似的高根除率。