Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1109-1119. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.047. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to compare the efficacy of genotypic resistance-guided therapy vs empirical therapy for eradication of refractory Helicobacter pylori infection in randomized controlled trials.
We performed 2 multicenter, open-label trials of patients with H pylori infection (20 years or older) failed by 2 or more previous treatment regimens, from October 2012 through September 2017 in Taiwan. The patients were randomly assigned to groups given genotypic resistance-guided therapy for 14 days (n = 21 in trial 1, n = 205 in trial 2) or empirical therapy according to medication history for 14 days (n = 20 in trial 1, n = 205 in trial 2). Patients received sequential therapy containing esomeprazole and amoxicillin for the first 7 days, followed by esomeprazole and metronidazole, with levofloxacin, clarithromycin, or tetracycline (doxycycline in trial 1, tetracycline in trial 2) for another 7 days (all given twice daily) based on genotype markers of resistance determined from gastric biopsy specimens (group A) or empirical therapy according to medication history. Resistance-associated mutations in 23S ribosomal RNA or gyrase A were identified by polymerase chain reaction with direct sequencing. Eradication status was determined by C-urea breath test. The primary outcome was eradication rate.
H pylori infection was eradicated in 17 of 21 (81%) patients receiving genotype resistance-guided therapy and 12 of 20 (60%) patients receiving empirical therapy (P = .181) in trial 1. This trial was terminated ahead of schedule due to the low rate of eradication in patients given doxycycline sequential therapy (15 of 26 [57.7%]). In trial 2, H pylori infection was eradicated in 160 of 205 (78%) patients receiving genotype resistance-guided therapy and 148 of 205 (72.2%) patients receiving empirical therapy (P = .170), according to intent to treat analysis. The frequencies of adverse effects and compliance did not differ significantly between groups.
Properly designed empirical therapy, based on medication history, is an acceptable alternative to genotypic resistance-guided therapy for eradication of refractory H pylori infection after consideration of accessibility, cost, and patient preference. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01725906.
我们旨在比较基因型耐药指导治疗与经验性治疗对难治性幽门螺杆菌感染根除的疗效,为此我们进行了两项随机对照试验。
我们于 2012 年 10 月至 2017 年 9 月在台湾进行了两项多中心、开放性标签试验,纳入了 2 次或 2 次以上治疗方案失败的 H pylori 感染患者(20 岁或以上)。患者被随机分配至接受基因型耐药指导治疗 14 天的组(试验 1 中 n=21,试验 2 中 n=205)或根据用药史接受经验性治疗 14 天的组(试验 1 中 n=20,试验 2 中 n=205)。患者接受埃索美拉唑和阿莫西林的序贯治疗 7 天,随后使用埃索美拉唑和甲硝唑,根据基因型耐药标记物(来自胃活检标本)选择左氧氟沙星、克拉霉素或四环素(试验 1 中用多西环素,试验 2 中用四环素),每天两次,共 7 天(均为每日两次)(组 A),或根据用药史接受经验性治疗。通过聚合酶链反应直接测序确定 23S 核糖体 RNA 或拓扑异构酶 A 的耐药相关突变。通过 C-尿素呼气试验确定根除状态。主要结局是根除率。
在试验 1 中,接受基因型耐药指导治疗的 21 名患者中有 17 名(81%)和接受经验性治疗的 20 名患者中有 12 名(60%)(P=.181)根除了 H pylori 感染。由于多西环素序贯治疗的根除率较低(26 名患者中有 15 名[57.7%]),该试验提前终止。在试验 2 中,根据意向治疗分析,接受基因型耐药指导治疗的 205 名患者中有 160 名(78%)和接受经验性治疗的 205 名患者中有 148 名(72.2%)(P=.170)根除了 H pylori 感染。两组不良反应和依从性的频率无显著差异。
在考虑可及性、成本和患者偏好的情况下,基于用药史的适当设计的经验性治疗是难治性幽门螺杆菌感染根除的基因型耐药指导治疗的可接受替代方案。临床试验注册号:NCT01725906。