Horsman Graeme
Teesside University, Campus Heart, Southfield Rd, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Sep;63(5):1392-1400. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13763. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
With an increase in the creation and maintenance of personal websites, web content management systems are now frequently utilized. Such systems offer a low cost and simple solution for those seeking to develop an online presence, and subsequently, a platform from which reported defamatory content, abuse, and copyright infringement has been witnessed. This article provides an introductory forensic analysis of the three current most popular web content management systems available, WordPress, Drupal, and Joomla! Test platforms have been created, and their site structures have been examined to provide guidance for forensic practitioners facing investigations of this type. Result's document available metadata for establishing site ownership, user interactions, and stored content following analysis of artifacts including Wordpress's wp_users, and wp_comments tables, Drupal's "watchdog" records, and Joomla!'s _users, and _content tables. Finally, investigatory limitations documenting the difficulties of investigating WCMS usage are noted, and analysis recommendations are offered.
随着个人网站创建和维护数量的增加，网络内容管理系统如今得到了频繁使用。此类系统为那些寻求建立在线形象的人提供了低成本且简单的解决方案，随后，也成为了一个出现过报道的诽谤性内容、辱骂信息和版权侵权行为的平台。本文对当前最流行的三种网络内容管理系统——WordPress、Drupal和Joomla! 进行了法医分析介绍。已创建测试平台，并对其网站结构进行了检查，以便为面临此类调查的法医从业者提供指导。通过对包括WordPress的wp_users和wp_comments表、Drupal的“watchdog”记录以及Joomla!的_users和_content表等工件进行分析，结果文档提供了用于确定网站所有权、用户交互和存储内容的可用元数据。最后，指出了记录调查网络内容管理系统使用情况困难的调查局限性，并给出了分析建议。
