Suppr超能文献

牛心包补片颈动脉内膜切除术的耐久性

Durability of Carotid Endarterectomy with Bovine Pericardial Patch.

作者信息

Oldenburg Warner A, Almerey Tariq, Selim Mahmoud, Farres Houssam, Hakaim Albert G

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;50:218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.11.062. Epub 2018 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have shown that patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of stroke and restenosis when compared with primary closure. Biological, synthetic, or vein patches have been traditionally used in CEA. This article reports the early and long-term outcomes of bovine pericardium (BP) for patch angioplasty in CEA.

METHODS

A retrospective, consecutive analysis of 874 patients who underwent CEA during the past 17 years at Mayo Clinic, Florida, was performed. BP patch (BPP) was used in 680 patients. Other CEA techniques were used in 194 patients (standard without patch, 78; standard with Dacron, 74; standard with vein patch, 16; and other techniques: bypasses, 26). We defined group 1 as those who underwent BPP angioplasty and group 2 as those who underwent all other techniques. Early and late clinical outcomes and patch-related complications (restenosis, infection, and hematoma) were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for the entire series was 39.6 months. There were no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality and morbidity between the 2 groups, except that BP group has less 30-day stroke (0.1%, 1 of 680) versus other techniques (1.5%, 3 of 194, P = 0.03). Thirty-day postoperative mortality rate was 0.1% (1 of 680) in BPP group and 1.0% (2 of 194) in other technique group (P = 0.13). No statistically significant difference was noted in 30-day postoperative major complications (transient ischemic attack [TIA], wound infection, hematoma requiring surgical evacuation, and nerve injury) between the 2 groups. Ten-year freedom from stroke/TIA were 97.8% in the BP group compared with 98.5% in the other group (P = 0.86). Ten-year freedom from restenosis was also similar between groups (89.0% BP vs. 90.4% others, P = 0.69). Ten-year survival rate was 38.4% in BP group and 45.0% in other technique group, and this was statistically significant on univariate analysis only.

CONCLUSIONS

CEA with BP angioplasty has excellent early and late outcomes with minor morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,与一期缝合相比,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后使用补片血管成形术可降低中风和再狭窄的风险。传统上,CEA中使用生物、合成或静脉补片。本文报告了牛心包(BP)用于CEA补片血管成形术的早期和长期结果。

方法

对佛罗里达州梅奥诊所过去17年中接受CEA的874例患者进行回顾性连续分析。680例患者使用了BP补片(BPP)。194例患者采用了其他CEA技术(标准无补片,78例;标准使用涤纶补片,74例;标准使用静脉补片,16例;其他技术:旁路手术,26例)。我们将第1组定义为接受BPP血管成形术的患者,第2组定义为接受所有其他技术的患者。记录并分析早期和晚期临床结果以及与补片相关的并发症(再狭窄、感染和血肿)。

结果

整个系列的中位随访时间为39.6个月。两组之间30天死亡率和发病率无统计学显著差异,但BP组30天中风发生率低于其他技术组(0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验