Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Vascular Surgery, 251 HAF and VA Hospital, Athens, Greece.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1241-1256.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.023.
Patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy is commonly used to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The objective of the present study was to compare the different patch materials that are currently available (synthetic vs venous vs bovine pericardium) in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.
This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and eligible randomized control trials were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central published until September 2017. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. The primary study end point was the incidence of long-term restenosis. Secondary study end points were 30-day stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction, neck wound infection, local hematoma, carotid artery thrombosis, cranial nerve injury, long-term stroke incidence, and death.
Eighteen studies and 3234 patients were included. The risk of 30-day stroke (relative risk [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-2.19; I = 0%), TIA (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.41-3.19; I = 0%), myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.14-3.97; I = 0%), death (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.21-1.34; I = 0%), wound infection (RR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.43-7.81; I = 0%), carotid artery thrombosis (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.44-4.97; I = 0%), cranial nerve palsy (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.53-2.77; I = 0%), and long-term stroke (RR, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.76-7.10; I = 0%), death (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.65-1.83; I = 0%) and restenosis of greater than 50% (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.19-1.20; I = 0%) were similar between the synthetic vs venous patch groups. Also, no differences in terms of 30-day stroke (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.02-5.16; I = 63.1%), TIA (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.14-1.76; I = 0%), death (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.05-10.51; I = 31.7%), carotid artery thrombosis (RR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-1.07; I = 0%), and long-term restenosis of greater than 70% (RR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.01-2.29; I = 70.9%) were detected between the synthetic polytetrafluoroethylene and Dacron patch groups. The comparison between the bovine pericardium vs synthetic patch did not yield any statistically significant results in terms of 30-day stroke (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.19-10.79; I = 12.7%), TIA (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.11-10.27; I = 0%), local neck hematoma (RR, 4.01; 95% CI, 0.46-34.85; I = 0%), and death (RR, 4.01; 95% CI, 0.46-34.85; I = 0%).
Closure of the carotid arteriotomy with any of the studied patch materials seems to be similar in terms of short- and long-term end points. However, additional randomized trials with adequate follow-up periods are needed to compare bovine pericardium patches with other patch materials.
在颈动脉内膜切除术期间使用补片修复通常用于治疗有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄。本研究的目的是比较目前可用的不同补片材料(合成材料与静脉材料和牛心包)在短期和长期结果方面的差异。
本研究根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行,并通过全面搜索 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane Central 数据库,确定了截至 2017 年 9 月的合格随机对照试验。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。使用 I ² 统计量评估异质性。主要研究终点是长期再狭窄的发生率。次要研究终点是 30 天内的卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、心肌梗死、颈部伤口感染、局部血肿、颈动脉血栓形成、颅神经损伤、长期卒中发生率和死亡。
纳入了 18 项研究和 3234 名患者。30 天内卒中的风险(相对风险 [RR],1.00;95%置信区间 [CI],0.45-2.19;I²=0%)、TIA(RR,1.14;95%CI,0.41-3.19;I²=0%)、心肌梗死(比值比,0.75;95%CI,0.14-3.97;I²=0%)、死亡(RR,0.53;95%CI,0.21-1.34;I²=0%)、伤口感染(RR,1.84;95%CI,0.43-7.81;I²=0%)、颈动脉血栓形成(RR,1.47;95%CI,0.44-4.97;I²=0%)、颅神经损伤(RR,1.21;95%CI,0.53-2.77;I²=0%)和长期卒中(RR,2.33;95%CI,0.76-7.10;I²=0%)、死亡(RR,1.09;95%CI,0.65-1.83;I²=0%)和大于 50%的再狭窄(RR,0.48;95%CI,0.19-1.20;I²=0%)在合成补片组和静脉补片组之间相似。另外,在 30 天内卒中(RR,0.31;95%CI,0.02-5.16;I²=63.1%)、TIA(RR,0.49;95%CI,0.14-1.76;I²=0%)、死亡(RR,0.74;95%CI,0.05-10.51;I²=31.7%)、颈动脉血栓形成(RR,0.13;95%CI,0.02-1.07;I²=0%)和大于 70%的长期再狭窄(RR,0.15;95%CI,0.01-2.29;I²=70.9%)在合成聚四氟乙烯和膨体聚四氟乙烯补片组之间也没有发现统计学意义上的差异。牛心包补片与合成补片的比较在 30 天内卒中(RR,1.44;95%CI,0.19-10.79;I²=12.7%)、TIA(RR,1.05;95%CI,0.11-10.27;I²=0%)、局部颈部血肿(RR,4.01;95%CI,0.46-34.85;I²=0%)和死亡(RR,4.01;95%CI,0.46-34.85;I²=0%)方面也没有统计学意义上的结果。
使用任何研究的补片材料关闭颈动脉切开术在短期和长期终点方面似乎相似。然而,需要更多具有足够随访期的随机试验来比较牛心包补片与其他补片材料。