Gärdenfors Peter, Lombard Marlize
Cognitive Science, Department of Philosophy, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Wallenberg Research Centre, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 12;9:87. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00087. eCollection 2018.
With this contribution we analyze ancient hunting technologies as one way to explore the development of causal cognition in the hominin lineage. Building on earlier work, we separate seven grades of causal thinking. By looking at variations in force dynamics as a central element in causal cognition, we analyze the thinking required for different hunting technologies such as stabbing spears, throwing spears, launching atlatl darts, shooting arrows with a bow, and the use of poisoned arrows. Our interpretation demonstrates that there is an interplay between the extension of human body through technology and expanding our cognitive abilities to reason about causes. It adds content and dimension to the trend of including embodied cognition in evolutionary studies and in the interpretation of the archeological record. Our method could explain variation in technology sets between archaic and modern human groups.
通过这项研究,我们分析古代狩猎技术,将其作为探索人类谱系中因果认知发展的一种方式。基于早期的研究成果,我们区分了七个因果思维等级。通过将力的动态变化作为因果认知的核心要素进行研究,我们分析了不同狩猎技术所需的思维,如刺矛、投掷长矛、使用梭镖投射器发射飞镖、用弓射箭以及使用毒箭。我们的解读表明,通过技术扩展人体与拓展我们对因果关系进行推理的认知能力之间存在相互作用。它为进化研究和考古记录解读中纳入具身认知的趋势增添了内容和维度。我们的方法可以解释古代和现代人类群体之间技术组合的差异。