Farshadzadeh Zahra, Taheri Behrouz, Rahimi Sara, Shoja Saeed, Pourhajibagher Maryam, Haghighi Mohammad A, Bahador Abbas
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Front Microbiol. 2018 Feb 12;9:153. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00153. eCollection 2018.
Two different mechanisms of resistance to colistin in have been described. The first involves the total loss of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) due to mutations in the operon, which is involved in the lipid A biosynthesis pathway. The second entails the addition of ethanolamine to the lipid A of the LPS resulting from mutations in the two-component system. To evaluate the impact of colistin resistance-associated mutations on antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties, four pairs of clinical and laboratory-evolved colistin-susceptible/colistin-resistant (Col/Col) isolates were used. Antimicrobial susceptibility, surface motility, and biofilm-forming capacity, and expression levels of biofilm-associated genes, and growth rate were analyzed in these strains. Growth rate, and biofilm formation ability, as well as expression levels of biofilm-associated gene were reduced in Col LPS-deficient isolate (the mutant) when compared with its Col partner, whereas there were not such differences between LPS-modified isolates (the mutants) and their parental isolates. Mutation in was accompanied by a greater reduction in minimum inhibitory concentrations of azithromycin, vancomycin, and rifampin than mutation in B. Besides, loss of LPS was associated with a significant reduction in surface motility without any change in expression of type IV pili. Collectively, colistin resistance through loss of LPS causes a more considerable cost in biological features such as growth rate, motility, and biofilm formation capacity relative to LPS modification. Therefore, Col LPS-modified strains are more likely to spread and transmit from one patient to another in hospital settings, which results in more complex treatment and control.
已描述了两种不同的对黏菌素耐药的机制。第一种涉及由于参与脂质A生物合成途径的操纵子发生突变而导致脂多糖(LPS)完全丧失。第二种是由于双组分系统发生突变,导致乙醇胺添加到LPS的脂质A上。为了评估与黏菌素耐药相关的突变对抗菌药物耐药性和毒力特性的影响,使用了四对临床和实验室进化的对黏菌素敏感/耐药(Col/Col)分离株。对这些菌株分析了抗菌药物敏感性、表面运动性、生物膜形成能力、生物膜相关基因的表达水平以及生长速率。与它的Col伙伴相比,Col LPS缺陷型分离株(pmrA突变体)的生长速率、生物膜形成能力以及生物膜相关基因的表达水平均降低,而LPS修饰型分离株(pmrC突变体)与其亲本分离株之间没有此类差异。与pmrC突变相比,pmrA突变伴随着阿奇霉素、万古霉素和利福平最低抑菌浓度的更大降低。此外,LPS的丧失与表面运动性显著降低相关,而IV型菌毛的表达没有任何变化。总体而言,相对于LPS修饰,通过LPS丧失导致的黏菌素耐药在生长速率、运动性和生物膜形成能力等生物学特性方面造成了更大的代价。因此,Col LPS修饰型菌株在医院环境中更有可能从一名患者传播到另一名患者,这导致治疗和控制更加复杂。