Lee Matthew James, Brown Steven R, Fearnhead Nicola S, Hart Ailsa, Lobo Alan J
Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Department of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;9(1):16-22. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100866. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
Fistulating perianal Crohn's disease represents a significant challenge to both clinicians and patients. This survey set out to describe current practice and variation in the medical management of this condition.
A survey was designed by an expert group of gastroenterologists and surgeons with an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) interest. The questionnaire aimed to capture opinions from consultant gastroenterologists with a UK practice on the management of acutely symptomatic fistula, assessment of a new fistula presentation, medical management strategies and surgical intervention. The survey was piloted at the British Society of Gastroenterology Clinical Research Group meeting, and distributed at UK gastroenterology meetings.
There were 111 completed responses (response rate 55%). Following clearance of sepsis, 22.1% of respondents would wait 6 weeks or more before commencing medical therapy. Antibiotics were used by 89.2%, with a variable duration. First-line medical therapy was thiopurine for 48% and antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) for 50% of respondents. These were used in combination by 44.4%. Interval to escalation of therapy (if required) varied from 1 month to a year. Anti-TNF therapies were favoured in deteriorating patients. An IBD multidisciplinary team was accessible to 98%, although only 23.6% routinely discussed these patients. Optimisation strategies for anti-TNF and thiopurines were used by 70% of respondents. Recurrent sepsis, refractory disease and patient choice are indications for surgical referral.
These results illustrate the huge variation in practice and lack of consensus among physicians for the optimal medical management of perianal Crohn's disease. There are gaps in knowledge that require targeted research.
肛周克罗恩病形成瘘管对临床医生和患者来说都是一项重大挑战。本次调查旨在描述这种疾病药物治疗的当前实践情况及差异。
由对炎症性肠病(IBD)感兴趣的胃肠病学家和外科医生专家小组设计了一项调查。问卷旨在收集英国执业的顾问胃肠病学家对急性症状性瘘管管理、新出现瘘管的评估、药物治疗策略和手术干预的意见。该调查在英国胃肠病学会临床研究小组会议上进行了预试验,并在英国胃肠病学会议上分发。
共收到111份完整回复(回复率55%)。在脓毒症清除后,22.1%的受访者会等待6周或更长时间才开始药物治疗。89.2%的受访者使用了抗生素,使用时长各不相同。48%的受访者将硫唑嘌呤作为一线药物治疗,50%的受访者将抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)作为一线药物治疗。44.4%的受访者将两者联合使用。治疗升级的间隔时间(如有需要)从1个月到1年不等。病情恶化的患者更倾向于使用抗TNF疗法。98%的受访者可以获得IBD多学科团队的服务,尽管只有23.6%的人会定期讨论这些患者。70%的受访者使用了抗TNF和硫唑嘌呤的优化策略。复发性脓毒症、难治性疾病和患者选择是手术转诊的指征。
这些结果表明,在肛周克罗恩病的最佳药物治疗方面,实践存在巨大差异,医生之间缺乏共识。存在知识空白,需要有针对性的研究。